Skip to main content

Where Are Quality Frontiers Moving to?

  • Chapter
Quality Assurance in Higher Education

Part of the book series: Issues in Higher Education ((IHIGHER))

  • 390 Accesses

Abstract

Neave has argued that ‘quality is not “here to stay” if only for the selfevident reason that across the centuries of the university’s existence in Europe, it never departed’ (Neave, 1994, p. 16), and that evaluation is ‘an intrinsic part of policy making’ (Neave, 1998, p. 265). Indeed, quality has been a permanent concern of universities from the early days of their foundation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Amaral, A. and Rosa, M.J. (2004) ‘Portugal: Professional and Academic Accreditation — The Impossible Marriage?’, in S. Schwarz and D. Westerheijden (eds), Accreditation and Evaluation in the European Higher Education Area (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press), pp. 127–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amaral, A. (2007) ‘From Quality Assurance to Accreditation — A Satirical View’, in J. Enders and F. van Vught (eds), Towards a Cartography of Higher Education Policy Change (UNITISK, Czech Republic), pp. 79–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amaral, A. and Neave, G. (2009a) ‘On Bologna, Weasels and Creeping Competence’, in A. Amaral, G. Neave, C. Musselin and P. Maassen (eds), European Integration and the Governance of Higher Education and Research (Dordrecht: Springer), pp. 271–89.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Amaral, A. and Neave, G. (2009b) ‘The OECD and Its Influence in Higher Education: A critical revision’, in A. Maldonado and R. Bassett (eds), International Organizations and Higher Education Policy: Thinking Globally, Acting Locally? (London and New York: Routledge), pp. 82–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, D. (2001) ‘Assessing Quality in Higher Education’, Liberal Education, 87(2), 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • BIS — Department for Business Innovation & Skills (2011) Higher Education. Students at the Heart of the System (London: The Stationery Office Limited).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B. and Krathwohl, D. (1956) Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, by a Committee of College and University Examiners. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain (New York: Longmans, Green).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1989). La noblesse D’état — Grandes écoles et esprit de corps (Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. and Passeron, J.C. (1982) A Reprodução (Rio de Janeiro: Francisco Alves).

    Google Scholar 

  • CHEPS (2011), http://www.utwente.nl/mb/cheps/research/projects/ceihe/(accessed 12 January 2012).

  • Dill, D. (1997) ‘Higher Education Markets and Public Policy’, Higher Education Policy, 10(3/4), 167–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dill, D. and Soo, M. (2004) ‘Transparency and Quality in Higher Education Markets’, in P. Teixeira, B. Jongbloed, D. Dill and A. Amaral (eds), Markets in Higher Education: Rhetoric or Reality? (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers), pp. 61–85.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dill, D., Teixeira, P., Jongbloed, B. and Amaral, A. (2004) ‘Conclusion’, in P. Teixeira, B. Jongbloed, D. Dill and A. Amaral (eds), Markets in Higher Education: Rhetoric or Reality? (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers), pp. 327–52.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, J. (2012) ‘MOOCs and Accreditation: Focus on the Quality of “Direct-to-Students” Education’, Inside Accreditation with the President of CHEA, 9(1), November 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • ENQA (2005) Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (Helsinki: ENQA).

    Google Scholar 

  • ENQA (2007) Report to the London Conference of Ministers on a European Register of Quality Assurance Agencies (Helsinki: ENQA Occasional Paper 13).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewell, P.T. (2005) ‘Applying Learning Outcomes Concepts to Higher Education: An Overview, prepared for the University Grants Committee’, http://www.khu.hk/caut/seminar/download/OBAlst_report.pdf (accessed 22 September 2013).

  • Filippakou, O. and Tapper, T. (2011) ‘Quality Assurance and Quality Enhancement in Higher Education: Contested Territories?’ Higher Education Quarterly, 62(1/2), pp. 84–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gornitzka, Å. (2009) ‘Networking Administration in Areas of National Sensitivity: The Commission and European Higher Education’, in A. Amaral, G. Neave, C. Musselin and P. Maassen (eds), European Integration and the Governance of Higher Education and Research (Dordrecht: Springer), pp. 109–131.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, L. (1981) ‘Circumscription and Compromise: A Developmental Theory of Occupational Aspirations’, Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28(6), 545–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halsey, A.H. (1992) Decline of Donnish Dominion: The British Academic Professions in the Twentieth Century (Oxford: Clarendon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, L. and Newton, J. (2006) ‘Transforming Quality Evaluation: Moving On’, in D. Westerheijden, B. Stensaker and M.J. Rosa (eds), Quality Assurance in Higher Education: Trends in Regulation, Translation and Transformation (Dordrecht: Springer), pp. 225–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higher Education Academy (2008) Quality Enhancement and Assurance: A Changing Picture? (York: Higher Education Academy).

    Google Scholar 

  • HEFCE (2001) Risk Management: A Guide to Good Practice for Higher Education Institutions (London: HEFCE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, F. and Jongbloed, B. (2010) ‘New transparency instruments for European higher education: The U-Map and the U-Multirank projects’, paper presented to the 2010 ENID Conference, 8–11 September 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassim, H. and Menon, A. (2002) ‘The Principal-Agent Approach and the Study of the European Union: A Provisional Assessment’, Working Paper Series. Birmingham: European Research Institute, University of Birmingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G.D. (2008) High-Impact Educational Practices: What They Are, Who Has Access to Them, and Why They Matter (Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities).

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Grand, J. and Bartlett, W. (1993) Quasi Markets and Social Policy (London: Macmillan Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leuven Communiqué (2009), http://www.ond.vlaanderen.be/hogeronderwijs/bologna/conference/documents/leuven_louvain-la-neuve_communiqué_ april_2009.pdf (accessed 22 September 2013).

  • Martens, K., Balzer, C., Sackmann, R. and Weymann, A. (2004) Comparing Governance of International Organisations — The EU, the OECD and Educational Policy, Trans State Working Papers No.7, Sfb597 ‘Staatlichkeit im Wandel (Transformations of the State)’, Bremen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meek, L. (2002) ‘On the Road to Mediocrity? Governance and Management of Australian Higher Education in the Market Place’, in A. Amaral, G. A. Jones and B. Karseth (eds), Governing Higher Education: National Perspectives on Institutional Governance (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers), pp. 235–60.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G. (1992) ‘On Bodies Vile and Bodies Beautiful: The Role of “Buffer” Organisations’, Higher Education Policy, 5(3), 10–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G. (1994) ‘The Policies of Quality: Development in Higher Education in Western Europe 1992–1994’, European Journal of Education, 29(2), 115–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G. (1996). ‘Homogenization, Integration and Convergence: The Cheshire Cats of Higher Education Analysis’, in V.L. Meek, L. Goedegebuure, O. Kivinen, and R. Rinne (eds), The Mockers and the Mocked: Comparative Perspectives on Differentiation, Convergence and Diversity in Higher Education (London: Pergamon Press), pp. 26–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G. (1998). ‘The Evaluative State Reconsidered’, European Journal of Education, 33(3), 265–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G. (2004) ‘The Temple and Its Guardians: An Excursion into the Rhetoric of Evaluating Higher Education’, The Journal of Finance and Management in Colleges and Universities, 1, 211–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2008) Assessment of Learning Outcomes in Higher Education: A Comparative Review of Selected Practices (Paris: OECD).

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2009a) Assessment of Higher Education Learning Outcomes (Paris: OECD).

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2009b) Analytical Framework for the Contextual Dimension of the AHELO Feasibility Study (Paris: OECD).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E.T. and Terenzini, P.T. (1991) How College Affects Students (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E.T. and Terenzini, P.T. (2005) How College Affects Students, Volume 2 (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass).

    Google Scholar 

  • QAA (1998) ‘The Way Ahead’, Higher Quality, 4, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • QAA Scotland (2008) Enhanced Led Institutional Review Handbook: Scotland, 2nd edition (Mansfield: Scotland).

    Google Scholar 

  • QAA (2009) ‘Guidelines for risk management (revised May 2009)’, http://www.qaa.ac.uk/AboutUs/corporate/Policies/Documents/Risk%20management%20 guidelines.pdf (accessed 22 September 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • QAA (2011) ‘Institutional review of higher education institutions in England and Northern Ireland: Operational description’, http://www.qaa.ac.uk/Publication s/InformationAndGuidance/Documents/ireni-operational-d.pdf (accessed 22 September 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Raban, C., Gower, B., Martin, J., Stoney, C., Timms, D., Tinsley, R. and Turner, E. (2005) ‘Risk management report’, http://www.edgehill.ac.uk/aqdu/files/2012/08/QualityRiskManagementReport.pdf (accessed 22 September 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosa, M.J., Sarrico, C.S., and Amaral, A. (2011) The perceptions of Portuguese academics on the purposes of quality assessment, paper presented to the Annual Conference of CHER — Consortium of Higher Education Researchers, Reykjavik, Iceland, 23–25 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sappington, D.E.M. (1991) ‘Incentives in Principal-Agent Relationship’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(2), 45–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, S. and Westerheijden, D. (2004) Accreditation and Evaluation in the European Higher Education Area (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, P. (1989) ‘The Power of Ideas’, in C. Ball and H. Eggins (eds), Higher Education into the 1990s: New Dimensions (Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press), pp. 7–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shalveson, R.J. and Huang, L. (2003) ‘Responding Responsibly to the Frenzy to Assess Learning in Higher Education’, Change, 35(1), 11–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R.L. (2000) ‘When Competition Is Not Enough: Consumer Protection’, Australian Economic Papers, 39(4), 408–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sursock, A. (2002) ‘Reflection from the higher education institutions’ point of view: Accreditation and quality culture’, paper presented at Working on the European Dimension of Quality: International conference on accreditation and quality assurance, 12–13 March 2002, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavares, D., Lopes, O., Justino, E. and Amaral, A. (2006) ‘Students’ preferences and needs in Portuguese higher education’, paper presented at the 2006 EAIR annual conference, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trow, M. (1996) ‘Trust, Markets and Accountability in Higher Education: A Comparative Perspective’, Higher Education Policy, 9(4), 309–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Vught, F. (2009) Mapping the Higher Education Landscape (Dordrecht: Springer).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Alberto Amaral

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Amaral, A. (2014). Where Are Quality Frontiers Moving to?. In: Rosa, M.J., Amaral, A. (eds) Quality Assurance in Higher Education. Issues in Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137374639_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics