Skip to main content

Introduction Doing Political Theory with Popular Films: Styles in Action in Everyday Life

Featuring Star Trek Into Darkness

  • Chapter
Popular Cinema as Political Theory
  • 291 Accesses

Abstract

Popular movies, novels, and television series help make our politics by making our myths. These are the symbolic stories that shape and make sense of what people do.2 It’s easy to see political mythmaking in movies like Argo (2012), Lincoln (2012), and Zero Dark Thirty (2012). Each concerns historical figures in the official, if sometimes secret, politics of government.3 When we see Tony Mendez (Ben Affleck) of the CIA rescuing American diplomats from a hostile Iran, or we see “Maya” (Jessica Chastain) of the CIA tracking Osama bin Laden to his death in Pakistan, we need not see James Bond (Daniel Craig) resurrected in Skyfall (2012) to know that covert operations are back in heroic vogue. When we watch President Lincoln (Daniel Day-Lewis) shaving truths, trading jobs for votes, or otherwise playing gutter-ball to outlaw slavery, none of us misses that the current occupant of the Oval Office has a mighty model for stooping to compromise—and “get things done.”

Americans don’t read books;

Americans don’t read newspapers;

Americans go to the movies.1

—Stephen Colbert

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See Joseph Campbell, Myths to Live By, New York, Viking Press, 1972;

    Google Scholar 

  2. Henry Tudor, Political Myth, New York, Praeger, 1972;

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. H. Mark Roelofs, Ideology and Myth in American Politics, Boston, Little, Brown, 1976;

    Google Scholar 

  4. James Oliver Robertson, American Myth, American Reality, New York, Hill and Wang, 1980;

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dora C. Pozzi and John M. Wickersham, eds., Myth and the Polis, Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Also see Geoffrey Hill, Illuminating Shadows: The Mythic Power of Film, Boston, Shambhala, 1992;

    Google Scholar 

  7. John Izod, Myth, Mind and the Screen: Understanding the Heroes of Our Time, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2001.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. See Phillip L. Gianos, Politics and Politicians in American Film, Westport, CT, Praeger, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See Stanley Cavell, Pursuits of Happiness: The Hollywood Comedy of Remarriage, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See Kiku Adatto, “Mythic Pictures: The Maverick Heroes in American Movies,” Picture Perfect, New York, Basic Books, 1993, pp. 124–166;

    Google Scholar 

  11. John Izod, Myth, Mind and the Screen: Understanding the Heroes of Our Time, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2001.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. See Laurence A. Rickels, The Vampire Lectures, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gore Vidal, “Reel History,” New Yorker 73, no. 34, November 10, 1997, pp. 112–120, on p. 115.

    Google Scholar 

  14. See Gore Vidal, Screening History, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Also see Gore Vidal, The Narratives of Empire, New York, Random House: Burr, 1974; 1876, 1976; Lincoln, 1984; Empire, 1987; Hollywood, 1990; The Golden Age, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  16. See John S. Nelson, “Conspiracy as a Hollywood Trope for System,” Political Communication 20, no. 4 (October–December 2003): 499–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. See John Fiske, Reading the Popular, Boston, Unwin Hyman, 1989;

    Google Scholar 

  18. John Fiske, Understanding Popular Culture, New York, Routledge, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  19. See Joseph Campbell, The Hero with a Thousand Faces, New York, World, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  20. See G. R. Boynton and John S. Nelson, “Orchestrating Politics,” Hot Spots: Multimedia Analyses of Political Ads, Urbana, University of Illinois Press, 1997, third chapter of a videocassette.

    Google Scholar 

  21. See Dan D. Nimmo, Popular Images of Politics, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall, 1974;

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dan D. Nimmo and James E. Combs, Subliminal Politics: Myths and Mythmakers in America, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall, 1980;

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dan D. Nimmo and James E. Combs, Mediated Political Realities, New York, Longman (1983), 2nd ed., 1990;

    Google Scholar 

  24. Geoffrey Hill, Illuminating Shadows: The Mythic Power of Film, Boston, Shambhala, 1992;

    Google Scholar 

  25. Michael Parenti, Make-Believe Media: The Politics of Entertainment, New York, St. Martin’s Press, 1992;

    Google Scholar 

  26. Michael Parenti, Land of Idols: Political Mythology in America, New York, St. Martin’s Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  27. See John S. Nelson, Tropes of Politics: Science, Theory, Rhetoric, Action, Madison, University of Wisconsin Press, 1998, pp. 115–204.

    Google Scholar 

  28. See Barry Keith Grant, ed., Film Genre Reader, Austin, University of Texas Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  29. See Jane Gaines, ed., “Film and TV Theory Today,” South Atlantic Quarterly 88, no. 2 (Spring 1989): 321–539; Elizabeth Ezra and Terry Rowden, eds., Transnational Cinema, New York, Routledge, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Niccolò Machiavelli, in The Prince, Robert M. Adams, ed. and trans., New York, Norton (1975), 2nd ed., 1992, p. 42.

    Google Scholar 

  31. See Thomas More, in Utopia, Robert M. Adams, ed., New York, Norton (1975), 2nd ed., 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  32. See Isadore Traschen, “Pure and Ironic Idealism,” South Atlantic Quarterly 59, no. 2 (Spring 1960): 1673–170.

    Google Scholar 

  33. See Kenneth Burke, “Realism and Idealism,” Dial 74 (1923): 97–99.

    Google Scholar 

  34. See Roman Jakobson, “On Realism in Art (1921),” in language in literature, Krystyna Pomorska and Stephen Rudy, eds., Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1987, pp. 19–27.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Also see Nelson Goodman, “Realism, Relativism, and Reality,” New literary History 14, no. 2 (Winter 1983): 269–272;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. W J. T. Mitchell, “Realism, Irrealism, and Ideology: After Nelson Goodman,” Picture Theory, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1994, pp. 345–362.

    Google Scholar 

  37. See Lois Parkinson Zamora and Wendy B. Faris, eds., Magical Realism: Theory, History, Community, Durham, NC, Duke University Press, 1995;

    Google Scholar 

  38. Maggie Ann Bowers, Magic(al) Realism: The New Critical Idiom, New York, Routledge, 2004;

    Book  Google Scholar 

  39. Wendy B. Faris, Ordinary Enchantments: Magical Realism and the Remystification of Narrative, Nashville, Vanderbilt University Press, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  40. See Roberto Mangabeira Unger, New York, Cambridge University Press, 1987: False Necessity: Anti-Necessitarian Social Theory in the Service of Radical Democracy, 1987; Social Theory: Its Situation and Its Task, 1987; Plasticity into Power: Comparative-Historical Studies of the Institutional Conditions of Economic and Military Success, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Also see David Graeber, Debt: The First 5,000 Years, Brooklyn, Melville House, 2011;

    Google Scholar 

  42. David Graeber, The Democracy Project: A History, a Crisis, a Movement, New York, Random House, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  43. See Fredric Jameson, The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act, Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  44. See Robert Hariman, Political Style: The Artistry of Power, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1995;

    Book  Google Scholar 

  45. Dick Hebdige, Subculture: The Meaning of Style, London, Routledge, 1979;

    Google Scholar 

  46. Stuart Ewen, All Consuming Images: The Politics of Style in Contemporary Culture, New York, Basic Books, 1988;

    Google Scholar 

  47. Barry Brummett, A Rhetoric of Style, Carbondale, Southern Illinois University Press, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  48. See John Dunn, Western Political Theory in the Face of the Future, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1979, pp. 1–27; Nelson, Tropes of Politics, pp. 150–179.

    Google Scholar 

  49. On Hollywood films as popular movies for Americans, see Richard Maltby, Hollywood Cinema: An Introduction, Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  50. See J. P. Telotte, Science Fiction Film, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2001.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  51. Also see John S. Nelson, “Political Mythmaking for Postmoderns,” Spheres of Argument, in Bruce E. Gronbeck, ed., Annandale, VA, Speech Communication Association, 1989, pp. 175–183.

    Google Scholar 

  52. See Olaf Stapledon, Odd John, New York, Garland (1936), 1975;

    Google Scholar 

  53. Olaf Stapledon, Star Maker, Middletown, CT, Wesleyan University Press, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Also see Doris Lessing, The Four-Gated City, New York, Knopf, 1969;

    Google Scholar 

  55. Doris Lessing, Briefing for a Descent into Hell, New York, Knopf, 1971;

    Google Scholar 

  56. Doris Lessing, Canopus in Argos: Archives, New York, Knopf: Shikasta, 1979; The Marriages Between Zones Three, Four, and Five, 1980; The Sirian Experiments, 1980; The Making of the Representative for Planet 8, 1982; The Sentimental Agents, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  57. See John G. Cawelti, Adventure, Mystery, and Romance: Formula Stories as Art and Popular Culture, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  58. See Rikke Schubart, “Passion and Acceleration: Generic Change in the Action Film,” in Violence and American Cinema, J. David Slocum, ed., New York, Routledge, 2001, pp. 192–207;

    Google Scholar 

  59. Eric Lichtenfeld, Action Speaks louder: Violence, Spectacle, and the American Action Movie, Middletown, CT, Wesleyan University Press (2004), expanded edition, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  60. See Machiavelli, The Prince; Harvey Mansfield Jr., Machiavelli’s Virtue, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1966;

    Google Scholar 

  61. Martin Fleisher, ed., Machiavelli and the Nature of Political Thought, New York, Atheneum, 1972;

    Google Scholar 

  62. Michael Ledeen, Machiavelli on Modern leadership, New York, St. Martin’s Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  63. See Max Weber, “Bureaucracy,” in From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, H. H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills, eds. and trans., New York, Oxford University Press, 1946, pp. 196–244;

    Google Scholar 

  64. Hannah Arendt, “Race and Bureaucracy,” The Origins of Totalitarianism, New York, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich (1951, 1958), 4th ed., 1973, pp. 185–221; Robert Hariman, “A Boarder in One’s Own Home: Franz Kafka’s Parable of the Bureaucratic Style,” Political Style, pp. 141–176.

    Google Scholar 

  65. See John S. Nelson, “Prudence as Republican Politics in American Popular Culture,” in Prudence: Classical Virtue, Postmodern Practice, Robert Hariman, ed., University Park, Pennsylvania State University Press, 2003, pp. 229–257.

    Google Scholar 

  66. See Darko Suvin, Metamorphoses of Science Fiction: On the Poetics and History of a Literary Genre, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1979, pp. 1–15;

    Google Scholar 

  67. Samuel R. Delany, “About Five Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Words,” The Jewel-Hinged Jaw: Essays on Science Fiction, New York, Berkley Books, 1977, pp. 21–37;

    Google Scholar 

  68. Mark Rose, Alien Encounters: Anatomy of Science Fiction, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1981, p. 20.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  69. See Mark Rose, ed., Science Fiction: A Collection of Critical Essays, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Tom Godwin, “The Cold Equations,” in Approaches to Science Fiction, Donald L. Lawler, ed., Boston, Houghton Mifflin, 1978, pp. 232–252.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2013 John S. Nelson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nelson, J.S. (2013). Introduction Doing Political Theory with Popular Films: Styles in Action in Everyday Life. In: Popular Cinema as Political Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137373861_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics