Skip to main content

Abstract

I discussed teacherly ethos back in Chapter 4, but ethos is so central to teaching excellence and to the argument of this book—it is so pervasive an influence in all classroom interactions—that a full account of its significance requires further and final analysis. Teacherly ethos is not so much about what a teacher should do (in an instrumental or methodological sense) as about who a teacher should be (in terms of character and virtue). Students care little about what methods their teachers use but do care immensely about what kinds of persons their teachers are. I have never heard a student apply the word “ethos” to their teachers, yet I know that it remains a primary student concern. I find in my seminars that this sometimes strikes teachers as unpleasant and even unfair: “What difference does it make what kind of person I am as long as I really know what I claim to know within my discipline?” Bad question. It misses the issues that lie at the center of both excellent teaching and effective learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Ronald A. Sharp, Friendship and Literature, Spirit and Form (Durham: Duke UP, 1986), 4.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Both Robert Audi and Peter Markie offer convincing arguments against teacher-student friendships of the buddy, mutually affectionate, and socially companionable kinds. See Audi, “On the Ethics of Teaching and the Ideals of Learning,” Academe (September-October, 1994): 27–36; Markie, “Professors, Students, and Friendship,” in Morality, Responsibility, and the University, ed. Stephen M. Cohen (Philadelphia: Temple UP, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  3. James M. Banner, Jr. and Harold C. Cannon, The Elements of Teaching (New Haven, CT: Yale UP, 1997), 113.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Aristotle. Rhetoric, trans. W. Rhys Roberts, Great Books of the Western World, vol. 9, ed. Robert Maynard Hutchins (Chicago, IL: Encyclopedia Britannica, 1952), 626.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Percy Bysshe Shelley, “A Defence of Poetry,” in Prose of the Romantic Period, ed Carl R. Woodring (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1961), 495.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Charles J. Sykes, Profscam: Professors and the Demise of Higher Education (New York: St. Martin’s, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Melissa Valiska Gregory

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gregory, M., Gregory, M.V. (2013). Teacherly Ethos Revisited. In: Gregory, M.V. (eds) Teaching Excellence in Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137373762_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics