Skip to main content

Equality through Difference: Policy Values, Human Rights, and Social Justice in the Employment Participation of People with Disabilities

  • Chapter
Emerging Perspectives on Disability Studies

Abstract

Since the postwar period, conceptions of disability have shifted from a status involving isolation and segregation to one that recognizes equal rights and participation. An integral factor in participation, the right to work, is recognized as a fundamental human right by the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD 2006). However, people with disabilities continue to be impeded by a disabling society embedded in structural and attitudinal barriers. People with disabilities are denied equal citizenship, which has been exacerbated in recent years as governments continue to face challenges in increasing the social and economic participation of people with disabilities. Particularly in liberal welfare states, contemporary disability employment policy embraces a neoliberal discourse and focuses on the development of workfare programs that encourage labor force participation as the principle means of achieving equality. This has resulted in a limited policy focus that fails to account for all the economic and cultural steps needed to ensure parity of participation of people with disabilities. This chapter uses examples from the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia of active labor market programs aimed at moving people with disabilities from welfare to work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. “Household Income and Income Distribution, Australia, 2007–08.” 2009. Retrieved May 9, 2011, from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/6523.o.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Labor Statistics. “Employment Situation—April 2011.” 2011. Retrieved May 20, 2011, from http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nro.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cass, Bettina. “Income Support for the Unemployed in Australia: Towards a More Active System.” Issues Paper No. 4. Canberra: Social Security Review, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Beth. National, Regional and Local Employment Policies in Australia. Callaghan: Centre of Full Employment and Equity, University of Newcastle, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Work and Pensions. Advisers and Intermediaries: Get Britain Working. 2011. Retrieved March 26, 2012, from http://www.dwp.gov.uk/adviser/updates/get-britain-working/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, Nancy. “Rethinking Recognition.” The New Left Review. 2000. Retrieved March 26, 2012, from http://www.newleftreview.org/?view=2248.

  • —. “Social Justice in the Age of Identity Politics: Redistribution, Recognition, and Participation.” In Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange, ed. Nancy Fraser and Axel Honneth, 7–109. London: Verso, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, David. “Neo-Liberalism as Creative Destruction.” Geografiska Annala 88 B.2 (2006): 145–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lister, Ruth. Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, Thomas H. Class, Citizenship, and Social Development. New York: Anchor Books, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. Transforming Disability into Ability: Policies to Promote Work and Income Security for Disabled People. Paris: OECD, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. Sickness, Disability and Work: Addressing Policy Challenges in OECD Countries: Issues for Discussion. Government Offices of Sweden: OECD, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office for National Statistics. Labour Market Statistics—March 2009. Newport, UK: Office for National Stastistics, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker Harris, Sarah, Randall Owen, and Robert Gould. “Parity of Participation in Liberal Welfare States: Human Rights, Neoliberalism, Disability and Employment.” Disability and Society 27.6 (2012): 823–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, Sarah. “Searching for the Absent Citizen: Enabling and Disenabling Discourses of Disability.” Australian Journal of Human Rights 12.2 (2007): 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, Sarah, and Bettina Cass. “New Paradigms of Disability in Social Security Law and Policy in Australia: Implications for Participation.” Disability Studies Quarterly 25.4 (2005): 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prideaux, Simon. “New Labour, Old Functionalism: The Underlying Contradictions of Welfare Reform in the US and UK.” Social Policy & Administration 35.1 (2001): 85–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sainsbury, Diane. “Review Essay: Welfare State Challenges and Responses: Institutional and Ideological Resilience or Restructuring.” Acta Sociologica 44 (2001): 257–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, Sheila. “Australian Welfare Reform: From Citizenship to Supervision.” Social Policy and Administration 36.4 (2002): 331–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silver, Susan, John Shields, Sue Wilson, and Antoine Scholtz. “The Excluded, the Vulnerable and the Reintegrated in a Neo-Liberal Era: Qualitative Dimensions of the Unemployment Experience.” Socialist Studies 1.1 (2005): 31–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stapleton, D., G. Livermore, C. Thornton, B. O’Day, R. Weathers, K. Harrison et al. Ticket to Work at the Crossroads: A Solid Foundation with an Uncertain Future. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research, Inc, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, Kwong-leung, and Heather Peters. “Internationalizing the Struggle against Neoliberal Social Policy: The Experience of Canadian Women.” International Social Work 49.5 (2006): 571–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [CRPD]. 2006. General Assembly Resolution A/61/611 adoption on December 6, 2006. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/enable/rights/convtexte.htm.

  • —. “Ratifications.” 2012. Retrieved March 26, 2012, from http://www.un.org/disabilities/default.asp?navid=18&pid=257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfson, Martin H. “Neoliberalism and Social Security.” Review of Radical Political Economics 38.3 (2006): 319–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Matthew Wappett Katrina Arndt

Copyright information

© 2013 Matthew Wappett and Katrina Arndt

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Harris, S.P., Owen, R., Gould, R. (2013). Equality through Difference: Policy Values, Human Rights, and Social Justice in the Employment Participation of People with Disabilities. In: Wappett, M., Arndt, K. (eds) Emerging Perspectives on Disability Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137371973_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics