Advertisement

Equality through Difference: Policy Values, Human Rights, and Social Justice in the Employment Participation of People with Disabilities

  • Sarah Parker Harris
  • Randall Owen
  • Robert Gould

Abstract

Since the postwar period, conceptions of disability have shifted from a status involving isolation and segregation to one that recognizes equal rights and participation. An integral factor in participation, the right to work, is recognized as a fundamental human right by the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD 2006). However, people with disabilities continue to be impeded by a disabling society embedded in structural and attitudinal barriers. People with disabilities are denied equal citizenship, which has been exacerbated in recent years as governments continue to face challenges in increasing the social and economic participation of people with disabilities. Particularly in liberal welfare states, contemporary disability employment policy embraces a neoliberal discourse and focuses on the development of workfare programs that encourage labor force participation as the principle means of achieving equality. This has resulted in a limited policy focus that fails to account for all the economic and cultural steps needed to ensure parity of participation of people with disabilities. This chapter uses examples from the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia of active labor market programs aimed at moving people with disabilities from welfare to work.

Keywords

Labor Market Employment Service Welfare Reform Labor Market Participation Active Citizenship 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Australian Bureau of Statistics. “Household Income and Income Distribution, Australia, 2007–08.” 2009. Retrieved May 9, 2011, from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/6523.o.Google Scholar
  2. Bureau of Labor Statistics. “Employment Situation—April 2011.” 2011. Retrieved May 20, 2011, from http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nro.htm.Google Scholar
  3. Cass, Bettina. “Income Support for the Unemployed in Australia: Towards a More Active System.” Issues Paper No. 4. Canberra: Social Security Review, 1988.Google Scholar
  4. Cook, Beth. National, Regional and Local Employment Policies in Australia. Callaghan: Centre of Full Employment and Equity, University of Newcastle, 2008.Google Scholar
  5. Department for Work and Pensions. Advisers and Intermediaries: Get Britain Working. 2011. Retrieved March 26, 2012, from http://www.dwp.gov.uk/adviser/updates/get-britain-working/.Google Scholar
  6. Fraser, Nancy. “Rethinking Recognition.” The New Left Review. 2000. Retrieved March 26, 2012, from http://www.newleftreview.org/?view=2248.
  7. —. “Social Justice in the Age of Identity Politics: Redistribution, Recognition, and Participation.” In Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange, ed. Nancy Fraser and Axel Honneth, 7–109. London: Verso, 2003.Google Scholar
  8. Harvey, David. “Neo-Liberalism as Creative Destruction.” Geografiska Annala 88 B.2 (2006): 145–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lister, Ruth. Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.Google Scholar
  10. Marshall, Thomas H. Class, Citizenship, and Social Development. New York: Anchor Books, 1965.Google Scholar
  11. OECD. Transforming Disability into Ability: Policies to Promote Work and Income Security for Disabled People. Paris: OECD, 2003.Google Scholar
  12. —. Sickness, Disability and Work: Addressing Policy Challenges in OECD Countries: Issues for Discussion. Government Offices of Sweden: OECD, 2009.Google Scholar
  13. Office for National Statistics. Labour Market Statistics—March 2009. Newport, UK: Office for National Stastistics, 2009.Google Scholar
  14. Parker Harris, Sarah, Randall Owen, and Robert Gould. “Parity of Participation in Liberal Welfare States: Human Rights, Neoliberalism, Disability and Employment.” Disability and Society 27.6 (2012): 823–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Parker, Sarah. “Searching for the Absent Citizen: Enabling and Disenabling Discourses of Disability.” Australian Journal of Human Rights 12.2 (2007): 1–25.Google Scholar
  16. Parker, Sarah, and Bettina Cass. “New Paradigms of Disability in Social Security Law and Policy in Australia: Implications for Participation.” Disability Studies Quarterly 25.4 (2005): 1–26.Google Scholar
  17. Prideaux, Simon. “New Labour, Old Functionalism: The Underlying Contradictions of Welfare Reform in the US and UK.” Social Policy & Administration 35.1 (2001): 85–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sainsbury, Diane. “Review Essay: Welfare State Challenges and Responses: Institutional and Ideological Resilience or Restructuring.” Acta Sociologica 44 (2001): 257–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shaver, Sheila. “Australian Welfare Reform: From Citizenship to Supervision.” Social Policy and Administration 36.4 (2002): 331–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Silver, Susan, John Shields, Sue Wilson, and Antoine Scholtz. “The Excluded, the Vulnerable and the Reintegrated in a Neo-Liberal Era: Qualitative Dimensions of the Unemployment Experience.” Socialist Studies 1.1 (2005): 31–56.Google Scholar
  21. Stapleton, D., G. Livermore, C. Thornton, B. O’Day, R. Weathers, K. Harrison et al. Ticket to Work at the Crossroads: A Solid Foundation with an Uncertain Future. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research, Inc, 2008.Google Scholar
  22. Tang, Kwong-leung, and Heather Peters. “Internationalizing the Struggle against Neoliberal Social Policy: The Experience of Canadian Women.” International Social Work 49.5 (2006): 571–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. United Nations. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [CRPD]. 2006. General Assembly Resolution A/61/611 adoption on December 6, 2006. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/enable/rights/convtexte.htm.
  24. —. “Ratifications.” 2012. Retrieved March 26, 2012, from http://www.un.org/disabilities/default.asp?navid=18&pid=257.Google Scholar
  25. Wolfson, Martin H. “Neoliberalism and Social Security.” Review of Radical Political Economics 38.3 (2006): 319–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Matthew Wappett and Katrina Arndt 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sarah Parker Harris
  • Randall Owen
  • Robert Gould

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations