Abstract
A venture capital market is crowded with low-quality ventures, where the chance of success of each venture is overstated by the entrepreneur, leading to a problem of adverse selection, a type of market failure known as the market for “lemons.” An entrepreneur developing a new product knows more than the investor about the product and its shortcomings. She may have an incentive to present the best information to the investor about the product and may overstate the chance of its success to obtain venture financing. It is difficult for an investor to distinguish between good-quality and poor-quality ventures. The venture capital market that is crowded with poor-quality ventures is consistent with the high failure rate observed with new ventures. Typically, five out of ten venture investments fail. Three out of ten are so-called, living dead or sideways, situations in which the investor might recoup the principal or a part of it. Only two out of ten investments may succeed, and out of the two successes, only one may provide a high return to the investor.
Keywords
- Venture Capital
- Adverse Selection
- Venture Performance
- Entrepreneurial Ability
- Venture Capital Market
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Amit, R., L. Glosten, and E. Muller. (1990). Entrepreneurial ability, venture investments, and risk sharing. Management Science, 36, 1232–1245.
Bruno, A. V., and T. T. Tyebjee. (1985). The entrepreneur’s search for capital. Journal of Business Venturing, 1, 61–74.
Cumming, D., and S. Johan. (2010). Venture capital investment duration. Journal of Small Business Management, 48, 228–257.
Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
Leland, H. E., and D. H. Pyle. (1977). Informational asymmetries, financial structure, and financial intermediation. Journal of Finance, 32, 371–387.
MacMillan, I. C., R. Siegel, and P. N. S. Narasimha. (1985). Criteria used by venture capitalists to evaluate new venture proposals. Journal of Business Venturing, 1, 119–128.
MacMillan, I. C., L. Zeman, and P. N. S. Narasimha. (1987). Criteria distinguishing successful from unsuccessful ventures in the venture screening process. Journal of Business Venturing, 2, 123–137.
McDonald, R., and D. Siegel. (1986). The value of waiting to invest. Quarterly Journal of Economics, November, 707–727.
Picot, A., U. Laub, and D. Schneider. (1990). Comparing successful and less successful new innovative businesses. European Journal of Operational Research, 47, 190–202.
Ruhnka, J. C., and J. E. Young. (1991). Some hypotheses about risk in venture capital investing. Journal of Business Venturing, 6, 115–133.
Venezia, I., and M. Brenner. (1979). The optimal duration of growth investments and search. Journal of Business, 52, 393–407.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Chandra S. Mishra and Ramona K. Zachary
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mishra, C.S., Zachary, R.K. (2014). Venture Financing, Adverse Selection, and Risk and Return. In: The Theory of Entrepreneurship. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137371461_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137371461_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-47769-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-37146-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)