Advertisement

‘With the Papists They Have Much in Common’: Trans-Atlantic Protestant Communalism and Catholicism, 1700–1850

  • Philip Lockley
Part of the Christianities in the Trans-Atlantic World, 1500–1800 book series (CTAW)

Abstract

In the proverbial Puritan mind’s eye, two visions were frequently at play: the ‘godly community’ in the present and the ‘millennial world’ of the future. By ‘godly community’ early separatist Pilgrims to Massachusetts meant not only a purified ecclesia — a fully-reformed Church of Christ — but also an authentic polity of God’s elect in the wilderness, freed from the clutches of ‘ungodly’ Europe. Among more moderate Calvinist clergy, gentry and artisans, in Britain and later New England, a broader commonwealth and Reformed Church on an inclusive parish model retained the concept of the covenanting community and, in places, the restriction of political rights to male church members. These duly bound ideas of godliness with citizenship and obedience to divine commands with social reciprocity.

Keywords

Communal Tradition Harmony Society Spirit Possession Religious Revival Documentary History 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    J. K. Jue, ‘Puritan Millenarianism in Old and New England’, in J. Coffey and P. C. Lim (eds), The Cambridge Companion to Puritanism (Cambridge, 2008), pp. 259–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. C. Gribben, Evangelical Millennialism in the Trans-Atlantic World, 1500–2000 (Basingstoke, 2011), pp. 20–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 2.
    The first Plymouth Colony was originally founded as a ‘partnership’ with a ‘common course and condition’. Contemporary sermons indicate the New Testament precedent of the Apostle Paul’s teachings on charity and shared sacrifice were more influential than conditions described in Acts; D. S. Lovejoy, ‘Plain Englishmen at Plymouth’, New England Quarterly 63 (1990), pp. 232–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 3.
    For a notable revisionist view of Puritan discipline and asceticism, see Theodore Dwight Bozeman, The Precisionist Strain: Disciplinary Religion and Antinomian Backlash in Puritanism to 1638 (Chapel Hill, NC, 2004).Google Scholar
  5. 4.
    T. J. Saxby, The Quest for the New Jerusalem: Jean de Labadie and the Labadists, 1610–1744 (Dordrecht, 1987). An earlier group of Dutch Mennonites, led by a Socinian, Pieter Cornelius Plockhoy, formed a short-lived community in the Valley of the Swans up the Delaware River in 1663. This community is often cited as America’s first ‘utopian community’. However, its brief existence (it was destroyed by the British navy in 1664) makes it difficult to relate to any broader historical trend.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. D. F. Durnbaugh, ‘Communitarian Societies in Colonial America’, in D. E. Pitzer (ed.), America’s Communal Utopias (Chapel Hill, NC, 1997), pp. 15–17.Google Scholar
  7. L. and M. Harder, Plockhoy from Zurik-zee: The Study of a Dutch Reformer in Puritan England and Colonial America (Newton, KS, 1952).Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    G. L. Gollin, Moravians in Two Worlds (New York, 1967).Google Scholar
  9. B. P. Smaby, The Transformation of Moravian Bethlehem: From Communal Mission to Family Economy (Philadelphia, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 8.
    Clarke Garrett, Origins of the Shakers: From the Old World to the New World (Baltimore, 1987 and 1998).Google Scholar
  11. 10.
    Examples include Pitzer (ed.), America’s Communal Utopias; R. S. Fogarty, Dictionary of American Communal and Utopian History (Westport, CT, 1980).Google Scholar
  12. R. P. Sutton, Communal Utopias and the American Experience, 1732–2000 (Westport, CT, 2003).Google Scholar
  13. 11.
    The Pietist origins of the Neu-Täufer and their distinction from Anabaptists were debated during the 1960s in response to new studies of the Mennonite tradition which recognised their opposition to Pietism. For a useful summary of this debate, see J. Bach, Voices of the Turtledove: The Sacred World of Ephrata (University Park, PA, 2003), pp. 28–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    In addition to Bach’s now standard study, Voices of the Turtledove, see K. Rexroth, Communalism: From Its Origins to the Twentieth Century (New York, 1974), pp. 177–8.Google Scholar
  15. 16.
    S. J. Stein, The Shaker Experience in America (New Haven, CT, 1992), pp. 87–90.Google Scholar
  16. 18.
    P.J. Brewer, ‘The Shakers of Mother Ann Lee’, in Pitzer (ed.), America’s Communal Utopias, p. 39; R. R. Ruether, ‘Shakers and Feminist Abolitionists in Nineteenth-century North America’, in Women and Redemption: A Theological History, second edition (Minneapolis, 2012), pp. 121–45.Google Scholar
  17. 19.
    Clarke Garrett has made an engaging case for the Shakers’ place within a diffuse culture accepting ‘spirit possession’ as a means of divine knowledge, located alongside the apocalyptic ‘French Prophets’, radical Quakers, Pietists and others within the religious tumult of the eighteenth century. Garrett, Origins of the Shakers, pp. 141–7. See also Richard Francis, Ann the Word (London, 2000), pp. 53–71.Google Scholar
  18. 20.
    Valentine Rathbun, An Account of the Matter, Form and Manner of a New and Strange Religion, Taught and Propagated by a Number of Europeans, Living in a Place Called Nisqueunia, in the State of New-York (Providence, RI, 1781); Stein, Shaker Experience, pp. 10–14.Google Scholar
  19. 21.
    Brewer, ‘The Shakers of Mother Ann Lee’, p. 39. It is common to link Ann Lee’s tragic experience of losing all her children young and the subsequent Shaker obsession with avoiding sex; see Lawrence Foster, Religion and Sexuality (Oxford, 1981), pp. 21–71.Google Scholar
  20. 22.
    T. S. Kidd, The Great Awakening: The Roots of Evangelical Christianity in Colonial America (New Haven, CT, 2007), pp. 313–19.Google Scholar
  21. On American millennialism in the revolutionary era, see R. Bloch, Visionary Republic: Millennial Themes in American Thought, 1756–1800 (Cambridge, 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. J. W. Davidson, The Logic of Millennial Thought: Eighteenth-century New England (New Haven, CT, 1977).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    S. A. Marini, Radical Sects of Revolutionary New England (Cambridge, MA, 1982), pp. 47–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    W. Plumer, ‘The Original Shaker Communities in New England’, in F.B. Sanborn (ed.), New England Magazine 22 (Boston, 1900), p. 307.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Significantly for questions over Shaker origins, this is an appropriation of an historic Quaker term; L. L. Wilson, Essays on the Quaker Vision of Gospel Order (Philadelphia, 2002).Google Scholar
  26. 28.
    Stephen Bowe and Peter Richmond, Selling Shaker: The Commodification of Shaker Design in the Twentieth Century (Liverpool, 2007).Google Scholar
  27. 29.
    Karl J. R. Arndt’s studies of the Harmony Society remain unequalled; see especially K. J. R. Arndt, George Rapp’s Harmony Society 1785–1847 (Philadelphia, 1965).Google Scholar
  28. For the Pietist context of the Society’s emergence, see K. J. R. Arndt (ed.), George Rapp’s Separatists, 1700–1803 — the German Prelude to Rapp’s American Harmony Society: A Documentary History (Worcester, MA, 1980).Google Scholar
  29. 37.
    On the longer history of Harmony, Indiana, see A. Taylor, Visions of Harmony: A Study in Nineteenth-Century Millenarianism (Oxford, 1987), pp. 34–5.Google Scholar
  30. 40.
    A. Hessayon, An Introduction to Jacob Boehme: Four Centuries of Thought and Reception (New York, 2014).Google Scholar
  31. 41.
    A. Weeks, Böhme: An Intellectual Biography of the Seventeenth-Century Philosopher and Mystic (Albany, NY, 1991), pp. 114–21.Google Scholar
  32. See also A. Hessayon (ed.), Jane Lead and Her Transnational Legacy (Basingstoke, 2015).Google Scholar
  33. 42.
    The best English-language introduction to Arnold is P. C. Erb, ‘Gottfried Arnold (1666–1714)’, in C. Lindberg (ed.), The Pietist Theologians (Oxford, 2005), pp. 175–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Alternatively, see J. Buchsel, Gottfried Arnold, Sein Verstaendnis von Kirche und Wiedergeburt (Witten, 1970).Google Scholar
  35. 43.
    Bach, Voices of the Turtledove, pp. 27–8; Buchsel, Gottfried Arnold, pp. 31–9. Some ascetic practices were influenced by Gottfried Arnold’s portrayal of the early church. See P. C. Erb, Pietists, Protestants, and Mysticism: The Use of late Medieval Spiritual Texts in the Work of Gottfried Arnold (1666–1714) (Metuchen, NJ, 1989), pp. 124–8.Google Scholar
  36. 49.
    The earliest public explication of this dispensational schema appears to have been [Joseph Meacham], A Concise Statement of the Principles of the Only True Church (Bennington, VT, 1790), pp. 3–15.Google Scholar
  37. 62.
    J.F. Sachse, The German Sectarians of Pennsylvania 1708–1742: A Critical and Legendary History of the Ephrata Cloister and the Dunkers (Philadelphia, 1899), i. 375–6.Google Scholar
  38. 63.
    Sachse, German Sectarians of Pennsylvania, i. 375; B. Jabez, A Tale of the Kloster: A Romance of the German Mystics at the Cocalico (Philadelphia, 1904), p. 115.Google Scholar
  39. 65.
    Stein, Shaker Experience, p. 48; P. J. Brewer, Shaker Communities, Shaker Lives (Hanover NH, 1986), pp. 16, 21, 52–3.Google Scholar
  40. 67.
    Benjamin West, Scriptural Cautions against Embracing a Religious Scheme, Taught by a Number of Europeans, Who Came from England to America in the Year 1776, and Stile Themselves the Church (Hartford, CT, 1783), pp. 3–8, 10–13.Google Scholar
  41. 68.
    Anon. ‘A Short Account of the People known by the Name of Shakers, or Shaking Quakers’, Theological Magazine I (1795), pp. 81–7; Stein, Shaker Experience, p. 67.Google Scholar
  42. 69.
    For a relevant study of anti-Catholicism in this period, see J. K. Duncan, Citizens or Papists? The Politics of Anti-Catholicism in New York, 1685–1821 (New York, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 70.
    Ralph Waldo Emerson to Charles Chancy Emerson, 1 January 1828, in Ralph L. Rusk (ed.), The Letters of Ralph Waldo Emerson (New York, 1936), i. 224–6.Google Scholar
  44. 71.
    An abridged version of ‘Narrative of Four Months residence among the Shakers at Watervliet’ is reproduced in G. R. Wergland, Visiting the Shakers, 1778–1849 (Clinton, NY, 2007), pp. 79–96 (p. 81). For a later comparison of Shaker and Roman Catholic confession, see Marie Thérèse de Solms Blanc, ‘Le Communisme en Amérique: Le Communisme dan la Réalite’, in The Shakers through French Eyes, trans E. R. McKinstry (Clinton, NY, 2011), pp. 160, 164.Google Scholar
  45. 74.
    K. J. R. Arndt (ed.), A Documentary History of the Indiana Decade of the Harmony Society, 1814–1824. Volume II 1820–24 (Indianapolis, IN, 1978), p. 526.Google Scholar
  46. 75.
    M. Birkbeck, Notes on a Journey in America, from the Coast of Virginia to the Territory of Illinois (London, 1818), pp. 135–7.Google Scholar
  47. 76.
    W. Faux, Memorable Days in America (London, 1823), quoted in Arndt, George Rapp’s Harmony Society, p. 276.Google Scholar
  48. 77.
    Thomas Hulme, ‘A Journal of a Tour in the Western Countries of America — September 30, 1919-August 8, 1819’, in W. Cobbett, A Year’s Residence in the United States of America, 3rd edn (Andover, 1828), p. 290.Google Scholar
  49. 78.
    William Hebert, A Visit to the Colony of Harmony in Indiana (London, 1825), pp. 3–4.Google Scholar
  50. 80.
    M.A. Noll, America’s God: From Jonathan Edwards to Abraham Lincoln (Oxford, 2002), pp. 31–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 81.
    Hartmut Lehmann, ‘Pietism in the World of Transatlantic Religious Revivals’, in Jonathan Strom et al (eds), Pietism in Germany and North America, 1680–1820 (Farnham, 2009), pp. 13–22.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Philip Lockley 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philip Lockley

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations