Skip to main content

The End of “The West and the Rest”

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The G20: A New Geopolitical Order

Abstract

Whatever its future may bring, the G20 has already made history in international cooperation as the first informal grouping of states that has transcended the North-South divide. This major point of fact tends to be sidelined, even virtually overshadowed, in European perceptions of the G20. Both the G77 and the G24 were created specifically to make the voice of developing countries heard, within the United Nations in the former case, and in the face of the 11 major IMF creditor countries in the latter. The G15, which grew out of the Non-Aligned Movement in 1989, set itself the objective of pursuing “a more positive and productive North-South dialogue” but nevertheless defined itself exclusively as a group of developing countries.1 Conversely, the G10 could only be a group of developed countries, discussing issues of loans and debt with debtor countries. And the G7 has always been a group of Northern countries that gradually incorporated a dialogue with the South—first Africa, and then the emerging powers—into its agenda.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. “Aims and Objectives,” Group of Fifteen (http://www.g15.org–Last accessed on October 16, 2013).

  2. Quoted on the South Korean GO presidency’s official website (retrieved in November 2010 from http://www.g20.org.go.kr).

  3. Sophie Bessis, L’Occident et les autres, Paris, La Découverte, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See in particular Robert Malley, The Call from Algeria. Third Worldism, Revolution and the Turn to Islam, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1996

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Pascale Bezançncon, Ruben Camara, Issiaka Mande and Jakob Schlupmann, Les sources historiques dans les Tiers-Mondes, Paris, L’Harmattan, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mark Berger (ed.), After the Third World? London, Routledge, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  7. As Antoine van Agtmael remarks in his book, The Emerging Markets Century, New York, Simon & Schuster, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jeffrey Garten, The Big Emerging Markets and How They Will Change Our Lives, New York, Basic Books, 1997. The ten countries are South Africa, Argentina, Brazil, South Korea, China, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Poland and Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jim O’Neill, “Building Better Global Economic BRICs,” Goldman Sachs Global Economics Paper, no. 66, November 30, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See Sreeram Chaulia, “Long Live BRIC, Welcome MIST,” Asia Times, January 26, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  11. “Joint Statement of the BRIC Countries’ Leaders,” Yekaterinburg, June 16, 2009 (available at http://archive.kremlin.ru–Last accessed on October 16, 2013).

  12. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  13. See among others Lyal White, “IBSA. South-South Co-operation with a Difference?” Global Insight (Pretoria), no. 36, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chris Alden and Marco Antonio Vieira, “The New Diplomacy of the South. South Africa, Brazil, India and Trilateralism,” Third World Quarterly, vol. 26, no. 7, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  15. “Brasília Declaration,” June 6, 2003 and presentation of “The India-Brazil-South Africa Dialogue Forum,” August 2011, on the official IBSA website. (available at http://www.ibsa-trilateral.org–Last accessed on October 16, 2013).

  16. See the final Yekaterinburg Declaration (http://archive.kremlin.ru/eng/text/ docs/2009/06/217928.shtml–Last accessed on October 16, 2013), and “BRICS Summit 2011 Joint Declaration,” Sanya, Hainan, April 14, 2011.

  17. Interview with Dimitri Medvedev by Kirill Kleimenov for Channel One Russia, June 18, 2009 (available at http://archive.kremlin.ru–Last accessed on October 16, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  18. “BRICS Summit 2011 Joint Declaration.”

    Google Scholar 

  19. See among other “L’offensive politique des Brics,” RFI, April 14, 2011; “China et les BRICS s’affirment face à l’Occident,” Radio 86, April 16, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jagannath Panda “BRICS’ Sanya Declaration. What It Means to Emerging Global Strategic Calculus,” The Tribune (Chandigarh), April 23, 2011; “Libye: les arrière-pensées de Moscow dans son rapprochement vers l’Occident,” Xinhua (french.news.cn), June 2, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  21. Vijay Prashad “BRICS vs. G7 with Libya as Proxy,” CounterPunch (California), July 7, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Christophe Jaffrelot, “India Keeps Abstaining …,” The Caravan, vol. 3, no. 8, August 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kishore Mahbubani, “The West and the Rest,” National Interest, no. 28, Summer 1992. The theory of “Asian values” has been sharply criticized by analysts of East Asian democracies, particularly the former dissident turned president of South Korea

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kim Dae-jung: “Is Culture Destiny” Foreign Affairs, vol. 73, no. 6, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  25. See among others Fareed Zakaria, The Post-American World and the Rise of the Rest, New York, Norton & Co, 2008

    Google Scholar 

  26. Fareed Zakaria “Le monde occidental est-il en danger?” Revue Internationale et Stratégique, no. 75, Fall 2009

    Google Scholar 

  27. Stefan Halper, The Beijing Consensus. How China’s Authoritarian Model Will Dominate the Twenty-First Century, New York, Basic Books, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  28. Stefan Halper “American Decline. This Time It’s Real,” Foreign Policy, special issue, January-February 2011;

    Google Scholar 

  29. Stefan Halper “L’Occident est-il fini?” Courrier International, special issue, February/March/April 2011;

    Google Scholar 

  30. Philippe Esper, et al., Un monde sans Europe? Paris, Fayard, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rana Foroohar, “The Decline and Fall of Europe (and maybe the West),” Time, August 22, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Dipesh Chakrabarty, Provincializing Europe. Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  33. See Karoline Postel-Vinay, L’Occident et sa bonne parole, Paris, Flammarion, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  34. See David Reynolds, “The Origins of the Two ‘World Wars’. Historical Discourse and International Politics,” Journal of Contemporary History, vol. 38, no. 1, January 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Edward Said, Orientalism, New York, Random House, 1978, and

    Google Scholar 

  36. James G. Carrier, Occidentalism. Images of the West, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ian Buruma and Avishai Margalit, Occidentalism. The West in the Eyes of its Enemies, London, Penguin Books, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  38. See in particular françois Duchâne, “Europe’s Role in World Peace,” in Richard Mayne (ed.), Europe Tomorrow, London, Fontana, 1972

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ian Manners, “Normative Power Europe. A Contradiction in Terms?” Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 40, no. 2, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  40. Zaki Laidi, Norms over Force, trans. Cynthia Schoch, New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  41. See among others Cranford Pratt (ed.), Internationalism under Strain. The North-South Policies of Canada, the Netherlands, Norway and Sweden, Toronto, Toronto University Press, 1989

    Book  Google Scholar 

  42. Davis Bobrow and Robert Kudrle, “Mid-Level Power Strategies for Changing International Niches. Experience in the ‘Old World Order’,” Journal of East Asian Affairs, vol. 5, no. 2, Summer–Fall 1991

    Google Scholar 

  43. Andrew Cooper et al., Relocating Middle Powers. Australia and Canada in a Changing World Order, Vancouver, University of British Columbia Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  44. http://www.g20.org (Last accessed on October 16, 2013).

  45. http://www.g20-g8.com (Last accessed on October 16, 2013).

  46. Muhammed Al-Jasser, “Keynote Address,” Conference of the Institute of International Finance, National Commercial Bank, Riyadh, February 24, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  47. “Joint letter of President Van Rompuy and President Barroso on the G20 Summit in Seoul,” Brussels, October 29, 2010, and see also “Joint Statement by President of the European Council Herman Van Rompuy and President of the European Commission José Manuel Barroso at the end of the G20 Summit in Seoul,” Seoul, November 12, 2010 (available at http://www. consilium.europa.eu (Last accessed on October 16, 2013)).

    Google Scholar 

  48. See Annex to the letter from Permanent Representative of Singapore to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General, “Strengthening the Framework for G-20 Engagement of Non-members,” New York, March 11, 2010 (available at http://www.mfa.gov.sg (Last accessed on October 16, 2013)). The 3G member states are Commonwealth of the Bahamas, Kingdom of Bahrain, Barbados. Botswana, Brunei Darussalam, Chile, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Jamaica, Principality of Liechtenstein, Malaysia, Principality of Monaco, New Zealand, Panama, Republic of the Philippines, State of Qatar, Republic of Rwanda, Republic of San Marino, Republic of Senegal, Republic of Singapore, Switzerland, United Arab Emirates and Uruguay.

  49. “Statement by Ambassador Vanu Gopala Menon Permanent Representative of Singapore to the United Nations on behalf of the Global Governance Group (3G) at the meeting of the ad-hoc open-ended working group to follow up on the conference last June of the world financial and economic crisis and its impact on development,” New York, June 2, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  50. According to the official website of the Banque de France: “La composition du G20” (available at http://www.banque-france.fr (Last accessed on October 16, 2013)).

  51. Gary Hawke, “G20 Consensus, Compliance and the Limits of Legitimacy, East Asia Forum Quarterly, vol. 2, no. 4, October–December 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Andrew F. Cooper, “The G20 and Its Regional Critics. The Search for Inclusion,” Global Policy, vol. 2, no. 2, May 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Jakob Vestergaard, “The G20 and Beyond: Towards Effective Global Economic Governance,” DIIS Report, Danish Institute for International Studies (Copenhagen), no. 4, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  54. See Kemal Dervis, “G20 Should Increase the Legitimacy of the International Institutions,” Europe’s World, Spring 2010;

    Google Scholar 

  55. Johannes Linn, “How the G20 Can Break the Stalemate in the Reform of the Multilateral Development System. Proposals for Action,” in Colin Bradford and Wonhyuk Lim (eds), Global Leadership in Transition. Making the G20 More Effective and Responsive, Washington and Seoul, Brookings Institution Press, Korea Development Institute, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  56. Paul Heinbecker, “The Future of the G20 and Its Place in Global Governance,” CIGI G20 Papers, no. 5, April 2011.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 Karoline Postel-Vinay

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Postel-Vinay, K. (2014). The End of “The West and the Rest”. In: The G20: A New Geopolitical Order. CERI Series in International Relations and Political Economy. Palgrave Pivot, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137367754_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics