Skip to main content

Comparing Political Communication across Time and Space: Conceptual and Methodological Challenges in a Globalized World — An Introduction

  • Chapter
Book cover Comparing Political Communication across Time and Space

Abstract

As political communication in advanced democracies has reached its ‘third age’ (Blumler and Kavanagh, 1999), or is even about to enter a ‘fourth age’ (Strömbäck, 2008), the relationship between citizens and those who govern is undergoing fundamental changes. Developments such as the commer- cialization of media systems, the changing norms and practices of jour- nalism, the rise of professional communication advisors and political public relations and — last, but not least — the unpredictable nature of the Internet are fundamentally altering the way in which political matters are commu- nicated in the public sphere. For many observers, ‘media frenzies’ (Sabato, 1991) and the ‘mediatization’ of politics (Mazzoleni and Schulz, 1999) are challenging the quality of democracy and are even one of the root causes of the current ‘crisis of democracy’ (Keane, 2009; Patterson, 1993). However, new forms of communication also open up spaces for a more participa- tory, inclusive and responsive political process (Bennett and Entman, 2001; Brants and Voltmer, 2011; Cain et al., 2003).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bartels, L.M. (1993) ‘Message received. The political impact of media exposure.’ American Political Science Review, 87, 267–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, W.L. and Entman, R.M. (eds) (2001) Mediated Politics. Communication in the Future of Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumler, J.G. (2012) ‘Foreword’. In F. Esser and T. Hanitzsch (eds) The Handbook of Comparative Communication Research (New York and London: Routledge), xi-xiii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumler, J.G. and Gurevitch, M. (1975) ‘Towards a comparative framework for political communication research’. In S.H. Chaffee (ed.) Political Communication. Issues and Strategies for Research (Beverly Hills: Sage), 165–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumler, J.G. and Gurevitch, M. (1995) The Crisis of Public Communication (London: Routledge).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blumler, J.G. and Gurevitch, M. (2001) ‘“Americanization” reconsidered: UK-US campaign communication comparisons’. In W.L. Bennett and R. Entman (eds) Mediated Politics: Communication in the Future of Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 380–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumler, J. and Kavanagh, D. (1999) ‘The third age of political communication: influences and features’. Political Communication, 16(3), 209–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brants, K. and Voltmer, K. (eds) (2011) Political Communication in Postmodern Democracy. Challenging the Primacy of Politics (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cain, B., Dalton, R.J. and Scarrow, S.E. (eds) (2003) Democracy Transformed? Expanding Political Opportunities in Advanced Industrial Democracies (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • DelliCarpini, M. (2004) ‘Mediating Democratic Engagement: the impact of communications on citizens’ involvement in political and civic life’. In L.L. Kaid (ed.) Handbook of Political Communication (New Jersey Lawrence Erlbaum), 395–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dogan, M. and Pelassy D. (1990) How to Compare Nations. Strategies in Comparative Politics, 2nd edition (Chatham: Chatham House).

    Google Scholar 

  • Esser, F. and Hanitzsch, T. (2012) ‘On the why and how of comparative inquiry in communication studies’. In F. Esser and T. Hanitzsch (eds) The Handbook of Comparative Communication Research (New York and London: Routledge), 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esser, F. and Pfetsch, B. (2004) ‘Meeting the challenges of global communication and political integration: the significance of comparative research in a changing world’. In F. Esser and B. Pfetsch (eds) Comparing Political Communication (Cambridge University Press), 384–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurevitch, M. and Blumler, J.G. (2004) ‘State of the art of comparative political communication research. Poised for maturity?’ In F. Esser and B. Pfetsch (eds) Comparing Political Communication (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 325–343.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hallin, D. and Mancini, P. (2004a) Comparing Media Systems. Three Models of Media and Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hallin, D. and Mancini, P. (2004b) ‘Americanization, globalization, and secularization: understanding the convergence of media systems and political communication’. In F. Esser and B. Pfetsch (eds) Comparing Political Communication (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 25–44.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hallin, D. and Mancini, P. (2012) ‘Comparing media systems: a response to critics’. In F. Esser and T. Hanitzsch (eds) The Handbook of Comparative Communication Research (New York and London: Routledge), 207–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanitzsch, T. and Donsbach, W. (2012) ‘Comparing journalism cultures’. In F. Esser and T. Hanitzsch (eds) The Handbook of Comparative Communication Research (New York and London: Routledge), 262–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtz-Bacha, C. (2004) ‘Political campaign communication: conditional convergence of modern media elections’. In F. Esser and B. Pfetsch (eds) Comparing Political Communication (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 213–230.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Keane, J. (2009) The Life and Death of Democracy (London: Simon and Schuster).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinsteuber, H.J. (2004) ‘Comparing mass communication systems: Media formats, media contents, and media processes’. In F. Esser and B. Pfetsch (eds) Comparing Political Communication (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 64–86.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Koch-Baumgarten, S. and Voltmer, K. (eds) (2010) Public Policy and Mass Media: The Interplay of Mass Communication and Political Decision Making (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, M.L. (1989) Cross-National Research in Sociology (Newbury Park: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzoleni, G. and Schulz, W. (1999) ‘“Mediatization” of politics: a challenge for democracy?’ Political Communication, 16(3), 247–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, T. (with Hinchman, L.) (2002) Media Democracy. How the Media Colonize Politics (Cambridge: Polity).

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, K. and Van Deth, J.W. (2005) Foundations of Comparative Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P. (2000) A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Postindustrial Societies. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P. (2009) ‘Comparative political communications: common frameworks or Babelian confusion?’ Government and Opposition, 44(3), 321–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, T.E. (1993) Out of Order (New York: Knopf).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfetsch, B. and Esser, F. (2004) ‘Comparing political communication. Reorientations in a changing world’. In F. Esser and B. Pfetsch (eds) Comparing Political Communication (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 3–22.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pfetsch, B. and Esser, F. (2012) ‘Comparing political communication’. In F. Esser and T. Hanitzsch (eds) The Handbook of Comparative Communication Research (New York and London: Routledge), 25–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plasser, F. (2000) ‘American campaign techniques worldwide’. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 5(4), 33–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, K. and Canel, M.J. (2013) (eds) Government Communication: Cases and Challenges (London: Bloomsbury).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabato, L. (1991) Feeding Frenzy. How Attack Journalism Has Transformed American Politics (New York: Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, G. (1994) ‘Compare why and how. Miscomparing and the comparative method’. In M. Dogan and A. Kazancigil (eds) Comparing Nations. Concepts, Strategies, Substance (Oxford: Blackwell), 14–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt-Beck, R. (1998) ‘Of readers, viewers, and cat-dogs’. In J.W. Van Deth (ed.) Comparative Politics. The Problem of Equivalence (London: Routledge), 222–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strömbäck, J. (2008) ‘Four phases of mediatization: an analysis of the mediatization of polities’. International Journal of Press/Politics, 13(3), 228–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, D.L. and P. Mancini, P. (Eds.), (1996) Politics, Media and Modern Democracy. An International Study of Innovations in Electoral Campaigning and Their Consequences. (Westport: Praeger).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thussu, D. (ed.) (2010) International Communication. A Reader (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dalen, A., Albaek, E. and De Vreese, C.H. (2011) ‘Suspicious minds: Explaining political cynicism among political journalists in Europe’. European Journal of Communication, 26(2), 147–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wirth, W. and Kolb, S. (2012) ‘Securing equivalence: problems and solutions’. In F. Esser and T. Hanitzsch (eds) The Handbook of Comparative Communication Research (New York and London: Routledge), 469–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaller, J.R. (1996) ‘The myth of massive media impact revived: new support for a discredited idea’. In D.C. Mutz, P.M. Sniderman and R.A. Brody (eds) Political Persuasion and Attitude Change (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press), 17–78.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 María José Canei and Katrin Voltmer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Canei, M.J., Voltmer, K. (2014). Comparing Political Communication across Time and Space: Conceptual and Methodological Challenges in a Globalized World — An Introduction. In: Canel, M.J., Voltmer, K. (eds) Comparing Political Communication across Time and Space. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137366474_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics