Skip to main content

Still Life in the Old Attack Dogs: The Press

  • Chapter
The British General Election of 2015

Abstract

During the 2015 campaign, there was considerable negativity and partiality in much press reporting; it was not difficult to find examples of robust political partisanship descending into personal vilification. Some of this was the kind of journalism that had been repeatedly highlighted and criticised only a few years before, following the 2011 hacking scandal and during the ensuing year-long Leveson Inquiry. Some commentators believed that this election might witness digital platforms operating as a counterbalance, assuming a more significant, potentially influential role in framing public participation in, and perceptions of, the contest. At the close of the campaign, Alastair Campbell observed: ‘Why has social media been so important? Politicians aren’t trusted anymore, business isn’t trusted like it was, the media is certainly not trusted like it was … The genius of social media, and the genius of Facebook is the concept of the friend. We trust our friends.’1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. The equivalent figures for 2010 in brackets are courtesy of Dominic Wring and David Deacon, ‘Patterns of Press Partisanship in the 2010 General Election’, British Politics, 5 (2010): 436–54. When considering press partisanship, it is important to account for the choice of party a given newspaper chooses to support, but also the strength of that endorsement. The key piece of information to determine this is the editorial declaration. Traditionally this used to be published on polling day itself, but now increasingly appears in the days and even the week before. Although the statement is, by definition, limited in terms of both time and space, it is nonetheless of significance. The editorial declaration conveys a viewpoint that normally reflects the newspaper’s political outlook as expressed in the preceding campaign. It is also something that the key decision-making editors, proprietors and/or journalists traditionally take very seriously.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 David Deacon and Dominic Wring

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Deacon, D., Wring, D. (2016). Still Life in the Old Attack Dogs: The Press. In: The British General Election of 2015. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137366115_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics