Advertisement

Recruitment in Comparative Perspective

  • Yuichi Kubota
Chapter
  • 49 Downloads
Part of the Asia Today book series (ASIAT)

Abstract

Because the formation of armed groups is based on the participation of individuals, the most direct consequence of combatant recruitment is the expansion of their forces. Chapters 4 and 5 examine armed groups’ efforts to collect combatants in the Cambodian civil wars by focusing on civil-military relations. Secondary and interview data reveal that recruitment potential is strengthened by the expansion of areas of control and the provision of positive and negative incentives for recruits. A possible extension of these findings is that the size of forces will likely be greater if the above variables are present. To explore the consequences of recruitment comparatively, this chapter focuses on the strength of armed forces in various cases of civil war.

Keywords

Comparative Perspective Local Affiliation Armed Group Popular Support Conflict Zone 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 3.
    David E. Cunningham, Kristian Skrede Gleditsch, and Idean Salehyan, “It Takes Two: A Dyadic Analysis of Civil War Duration and Outcome,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, 53 (4) (2009): 570–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 4.
    Nils Petter Gleditsch et al., “Armed Conflict 1946–2001: A New Dataset,” Journal of Peace Research 39 (5) (2002): 615–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 8.
    Halyard Buhaug and Scott Gates, “The Geography of Civil War,” Journal of Peace Research, 39 (4) (2002): 417–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 12.
    Halyard Buhaug and Päivi Lujala, “Accounting for Scale: Measuring Geography in Quantitative Studies of Civil War,” Political Geography, 24 (4) (2005): 399–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 14.
    Dwight Lee and Richard McKenzie, “Reexamination of the Relative Efficiency of the Draft and the All-Voluntary Army,” Southern Economic Journal, 58 (3) (1992): 644–654;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Thomas Ross, “Raising an Army: A Positive Theory of Military Recruitment,” Journal of Law and Economics, 37 (1) (1994): 109–131;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. John Warner and Beth Asch, “The Economic Theory of a Military Draft Reconsidered,” Defense and Peace Economics, 7 (4) (1996): 297–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 15.
    See Bethany Lacina, “Explaining the Severity of Civil Wars,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50 (2) (2006): 276–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 16.
    Guillaume R. Frechette, “Random-Effects Ordered Probit,” Stata Technical Bulletin, 59 (2001): 23–27;Google Scholar
  10. Guillaume R. Frechette, “Update to Random-Effects Ordered Probit,” Stata Technical Bulletin, 61 (2001): 12.Google Scholar
  11. 17.
    Thomas Brambor, William Roberts Clark, and Matt Golder, “Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses,” Political Analysis, 14 (1) (2005): 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Yuichi Kubota 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yuichi Kubota

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations