Abstract
Globalization often serves as a perfunctory point of reference for positioning the development of international courts and tribunals (ICTs). The dominant scholarship in international law engages almost exclusively with formal law. This chapter argues that globalization-focused research can provide critical insights into how international justice can be delivered more efficiently. Empirical data illustrate the implications of the roles adopted by professionals in the courtroom and suggest how they can be adapted in future reforms to enhance trial efficiency. The conclusion argues that the observation of trial practice through the lens of international integration can oil the slow wheels of justice.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Byrne, R. (2006) Promises of Peace and Reconciliation: Previewing the Legacy of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, European Review, 14, pp. 485–498.
Byrne, R. (2007) Assessing Testimonial Evidence: Lessons from the International Criminal Tribunals, International Journal of Refugee Law, 19, pp. 609–638.
Byrne, R. (2010) The New Public International Law and the Hidden Art of International Criminal Trial Practice, Connecticut Journal of International Law, 25, pp. 243–303.
Byrne, R. (2013) Drawing the Missing Map: What Socio4egal Research Can Offer to International Criminal Trial Practice, Leiden Journal of International Law 26(4), pp. 991–1107.
Eltringham, N. (2008) A War Crimes Community? The Legacy of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda beyond Jurisprudence, New England Journal of International and Comparative Law, 14(2), pp. 309–318.
Ford, S. (2011) How Leadership in International Criminal Law is Shifting from the United States to Europe and Asia: An Analysis of Spending on and Contributions to International Criminal Courts, St Louis University Law Journal, 55(3), pp. 953–999.
Langer, M. and Doherty J. (2011) Managerial Judging Goes International, but Its Promise Remains Unfulfilled: An Empirical Assessment of the ICTY Reforms, Yale Journal of International Law, 36, pp. 241–305.
Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (1998) 2187 U.N.T.S. 3, 37 I.L.M. 999
Rules of Procedure and Evidence of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (adopted 29 June 1995, as last amended).
Stahn, C. (2012) Between ‘Faith’ and ‘Facts’: By What Standards Should We Assess International Criminal Justice, Leiden Journal of International Law, 25, pp. 251–282.
Turner, J. (2008) Defense Perspectives on Law and Politics in International Criminal Trials, Virginia Journal of International Law, 48, pp. 529, 547.
Twining, W. (2006) Diffusion and Globalization Discourse, Harvard International Law Journal, 47, pp. 507–516.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Rosemary Byrne
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Byrne, R. (2014). Globalizing Legal Process in the Struggle to Counter Impunity Efficiently. In: Brennan, L. (eds) Enacting Globalization. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137361943_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137361943_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-47246-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-36194-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)