Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The ‘Rhetoric of Gloom’ v. the Discourse of Impact in the Humanities: Stuck in a Deadlock?

  • Chapter
Humanities in the Twenty-First Century

Abstract

Times of financial hardship are always especially difficult for the arts and humanities, within academia and outside, for it is in periods of austerity and contraction in public funding that the spiky question of the ‘value of the humanities’ raises its ugly head, demanding at least robust engagement, if not a final resolution capable of satisfying, once and for all, those who see arts and humanities education as self-indulgent frills to be forgone in times of financial restraint. Being accustomed to be called upon to justify their existence in the curriculum and their claims on the public purse, arts and humanities scholars and practitioners at these times usually have feelings of being beleaguered, undervalued, and misunderstood, or even ‘under fire’ (Pinxten 2011).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • AHRC — Arts and Humanities Research Council (2009) AHRC Economic Impact Baseline 2009/2010, Bristol, AHRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • AHRC — Arts and Humanities Research Council (2009) Leading the World: The Economic Impact of UK Arts and Humanities Research, Bristol, AHRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, M. and Freedman, D. (ed.) (2011) The Assault on Universities: A Manifesto for Resistance, London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhshi, H., Schneider, P. and Walker, C. (2008) Arts and Humanities Research and Innovation, London, NESTA & AHRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belfiore, E. (2002) ‘Art as a means towards alleviating social exclusion: does it really work? A critique of instrumental cultural policies and social impact studies in the UK’, in International Journal of Cultural Policy, 8(1), 91–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belfiore, E. (2009) ‘On bullshit in cultural policy practice and research: notes from the British case’, in International Journal of Cultural Policy, 15(3), 343–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belfiore, E. (2010) ‘Is it really about the evidence? On the rhetorical aspect of cultural policy’. Paper delivered at the International Conference in Cultural Policy Research, University of Jyväskylä, 24–27 August 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belfiore, E. (2012) ‘“Defensive instrumentalism” and the legacy of New Labour’s cultural policies’, in Cultural Trends, 21(2), 103–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belfiore, E. and Bennett, O. (2008) The Social Impact of the Arts: An Intellectual History, Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Belfiore, E. and Bennett, O. (2010) ‘Beyond the “toolkit approach”: arts impact evaluation research and the realities of cultural policy-making’, in Journal for Cultural Research, 14(2), 121–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bérubé, M. (2003) ‘The utility of the arts and humanities’, in Arts & Humanities in Higher Education, 2(1), 23–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bérubé, M. (2006) ‘Book review: Paulson, William literary culture in a world transformed, Ithaca and London: Cornell university Press, 2001’ in Substance, 35(2), 178–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bérubé, M. and Nelson, C. (eds) (1995) Higher Education under Fire: Politics, Economics and the Crisis of the Humanities, New York, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boutang, Y. M. (2011) Cognitive Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • British Academy (2008) Punching Our Weight: The Humanities and Social Sciences in Public Policy Making, London, British Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne Report (2010) Securing a Sustainable Future for Higher Education: An Independent Review of Higher Education Funding and Student Finance, London: Independent Review of Higher Education Funding and Student Finance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullen, E., Robb, S. and Kenway, J. (2004) ‘“Creative destruction”: knowledge economy policy and the future of the arts and humanities in the academy’, in Journal of Education Policy, 19(1), 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, G. A. (2002) ‘Deeper into bullshit’, in S. Buss and L. Overton (eds) Contours of Agency: Essays on Themes from Harry Frankfurt, Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collini, S. (2012) What Are Universities For? London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crews, F. (2001) Postmodern Pooh, New York: North Point Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denham, A. and Garnett, M. (1998) British Think-tanks and the Climate of Opinion, London: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Docherty, T. (2011) For the University: Democracy and the Future of the Institution, London: Bloomsbury.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eagleton, T. (1999) ‘In the gaudy supermarket’, in London Review of Books, 21(10), http://www.lrb.co.uk/v21/n10/terry-eagleton/in-the-gaudy-supermarket [Accessed 23rd January 2013].

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H. (2001) ‘The second academic revolution and the rise of entrepreneurial science’, in IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 20(2), 18–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fish, S. (2008) Save the World in Your Own Time, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, D. (2011) ‘An introduction to education reform and resistance’, in M. Bailey and D. Freedman (ed.) The Assault on Universities: A Manifesto for Resistance, London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harpham, H. G. (2011) The Humanities and the Dream of America, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hohendahl, P. U. (2005) ‘The future of the research university and the fate of the Humanities’, in Cultural Critique, 61, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmwood, J. (ed.) (2011) A Manifesto for the Public University, London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, A., Kitson, M., Probert, J., Bullock, A. and Miller, I. (2011) Hidden Connections: Knowledge Exchange between the Arts and Humanities and the Private, Public and Third Sectors, Swindon: AHRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGettigan, A. ‘(May/June 2011) “New providers”: the creation of a market in higher education’, in Radical Philosophy, issue 167, http://www.rasdicalphilosophy.com/commentary/%E2%80%98new-providers%E2%80%99-the-creation-of-a-market-in-higher-education [Accessed 13th February 2013].

  • Menand, L. (2005) ‘Dangers within and without’, in Profession 2005, journal of the Modern Language Association, 10–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moriarty, P. (2011) ‘Science as a Public Good’, in J. Holmwood (ed.) A Manifesto for the Public University, London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (2010) Not for Profit: Why democracy Needs the Humanities, Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, D. (2010) Measuring the Value of Culture, London: DCMS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulson, W. (2001) Literary Culture in a World Transformed: A Future for the Humanities, Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinxten, H. (2011) ‘Humanities under fire?’ In R. Vanderbeeken, F. Le Roy, C. Stalpaert, C., D. Aerts (eds) Drunk on Capitalism. An Interdisciplinary Reflection on Market Economy, Art and Science, Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plumb, J. H. (ed.) (1964) Crisis in the Humanities, London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisz, M. (2010) ‘World crisis in humanities, not many hurt’, in Times Higher Education, 21st October 2010, http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storycode=413900 [Accessed 13th February 2013].

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothbard, M. (1989) ‘The hermeneutical invasion of Philosophy and Economics’, in The Review of Austrian Economics, 3(1), 45–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandel, M. (2012) What Money Can’t Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets, London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scruton, R. (2004) ‘Culture Matters’, Speech given at the Ingersoll Symposium on ‘The Importance of Culture’, North Carolina Intercollegiate Studies Institute, Belmont Abbey College, Charlotte NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaxson, L. (2013) ‘Research uptake and impact: are we in danger of overstating ourselves?’ Post on the Impact of Social Sciences blog, LSE, http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2013/01/24/8864/#more-8864 [Accessed 25th January 2013].

  • Smith, S. (2011) ‘Afterword: a positive future for higher education in England’, in J. Holmwood (ed.) A Manifesto for the Public University, London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szeman, I. (2003) ‘Culture and globalization, or, the humanities in ruins’, in The New Centennial Review, 3(2), 91–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, L. (1996) ‘The self-inflicted irrelevance of American academics’, in Academe, 82(4), 18–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X. (2005) ‘Farewell to the humanities’, in Rethinking Marxism, 17(4), 525–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whipple, T. and Lay, K. (2012) ‘Dyson inventor says schools should focus on science, not arts’, Times, 10 November 2012, http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/education/article3596125.ece [Accessed on 24th January 2013].

  • Williams, J. J. (2012) ‘Deconstructing Academe: The birth of critical university studies’, in The Chronicle of Higher Education, 19th February 2012, http://chronicle.com/article/An-Emerging-Field-Deconstructs/130791/ [Accessed 24th January 2013].

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. (2013) Consuming Higher Education: Why Learning Can’t Be Bought, London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Working Group on Expanding Access to Published Research Findings (2012). Accessibility, Sustainability, Excellence: How to Expand Access to Research publications. Report of the Working Group on Expanding Access to Published Research Findings. London: Research Information Network. [The Finch Report]

    Google Scholar 

  • Yúdice, G. (1999) ‘The privatization of culture’, in Social Text, 59, 17(2), 17–34.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Eleonora Belfiore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Cultural Policy Studies, University of Warwick, UK

    Eleonora Belfiore (Associate Professor in Cultural Policy) (Associate Professor in Cultural Policy)

  2. School of Performance and Cultural Industries, University of Leeds, UK

    Anna Upchurch (Lecturer in Cultural Industries) (Lecturer in Cultural Industries)

Copyright information

© 2013 Eleonora Belfiore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Belfiore, E. (2013). The ‘Rhetoric of Gloom’ v. the Discourse of Impact in the Humanities: Stuck in a Deadlock?. In: Belfiore, E., Upchurch, A. (eds) Humanities in the Twenty-First Century. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137361356_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation