Abstract
As a Pacific power and stakeholder in Asian regional stability, the United States has uneasily found its leadership under competition and even challenge from China after the turn of the century. On the economic front, there has been a confluence of three developments, the robust and seemingly unstoppable economic growth and the accumulation of huge foreign exchange reserves in China, the Heisei recession and its aftermath in Japan, and more recently the U.S-triggered global financial crisis in 2007–2009 and the sluggish economic recovery in the United States. As a result of these ebbs and flows, economic and financial resources have shifted massively in favor of China, and China is emerging as the new economic hub in the region that is becoming highly interdependent. On the security front, the US devotion to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and hence its inattentiveness to Asia, and the military buildup in China during the last decade have altered the parameters of the security environment in the Asia Pacific. American security commitments to its Asian allies were diluted by a decade-long neglect of increasing apprehension in many Asian countries facing, for some right on their doorstep, a rising and assertive China. The US pivot-to-Asia initiative (the Pivot) and its push for the Trans-Pacific Partnership (the TPP, a “high-quality” free trade agreement) are the first step to rebalance US security and economic leadership in the Asia Pacific. This chapter contends that there are compelling reasons for the United States to conjoin the two enterprises, the Pivot and the TPP.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Amos, James F. (2013). “The Marines Need Funding for Today’s Threats, Not a Pre-9/11 World,” Wall Street Journal (September 17), A17.
Baldwin, Richard (2004). The Spoke Trap: The Hub and Spoke Bilateralism in East Asia, CNEAC Research Series, 04–02. Seoul: Korean Institute for International Economic Policy.
Barnes, Julian E. (2013). “Hagel Says New Asia Focus Will Help Boost Economies,” Wall Street Journal (August 26), A7.
Browne, Andrew (2013a). “Asia Ponders U.S. Role amid Syria Strife,” Wall Street Journal (September 11), A5.
Browne, Andrew (2013b). “Philippines Views U.S. Bases in New Light,” Wall Street Journal (September 17), A12.
Cha, Victor D. (2000). “Abandonment, Entrapment, and Neoclassical Realism in Asia: The U.S., Japan and Korea,” International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 44, pp. 261–269.
Cheng, T. J. (2005). “China-Taiwan Economic Linkage: Between Insulation and Superconductivity,” in Nancy Berkopf Tucker, ed., Dangerous Strait: The US-Taiwan-China Crisis. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 93–130.
Cheng, T. J. and Xuan Liu (2013). “Foreign Exchange Reserves: A New Challenge to China,” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Vol. 35, No. 2 (Summer), pp. 621–647.
Chow, Peter C. Y. (2012). Trade and Industrial Development in East Asia: Catching Up or Falling Behind. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Chow, Peter C. Y., ed. (2013a). “The Emerging Trade Bloc across the Taiwan Strait in Regional and Global Perspective,” in Economic Integration across the Taiwan Strait. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, chapter 10.
Chow, Peter C. Y. (2013b). “Taiwan’s Industrial Policy to Cope with Globalization,” Paper presented at the European Association for Taiwan Studies in Lyon, France, May 2013.
Christensen, Thomas J. and Jack Snyder (1990). “Chained Gangs and Passed Bucks: Predicting Alliance Patterns in Multipolarity,” International Organization, Vol. 44, No. 2 (Spring), pp. 137–169.
Cropsey, Seth (2013). Mayday: The Decline of American Naval Supremacy. New York: Overlook.
Cruz de Castro, Renato (2013). “Territorial Disputes, Realpolitik, and Alliance Transformation: The Case of Twenty-First Century Philippine-U.S. Security Relations,” Issues and Studies, Vol. 49, No. 1 (March), pp. 141–177.
Fergusson, Ian F., William H. Cooper, Remy Jurenas, and Brock R. Williams (2013). The Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiations and the Issues for the Congress, Congressional Research Service Report for Congress, R42694.
Friedberg, Aaron L. (2011). A Contest for Supremacy. New York: W.W. Norton.
Glaser, Bonnie (2012). “Pivot to Asia: Prepare for Unintended Consequences,” Global Forecast2012, accessed at http://csis.org/files/publication/120413_gf_glaser.pdf.
Haass, Richard (2013). Foreign Policy Begins at Home: The Case for Putting American House in Order. New York: Basic Books.
Hsu, Bo-Xian (2012). “A Comparative Analysis on the Impacts of the TPP and RCEP on Taiwan’s Economy,” APEC Newsletter, No. 159 December, pp. 6–7, accessed at http://www.ctasc.org.tw/02publication/APEC-159-p06–07.pdf.
Hsu, Bo-Xian (2013). “A Quantitative Assessment on the Impact of the TPP on Taiwan’s Macro Economy and Industries,” Taiwan Economic Research Monthly (February), pp. 26–36.
Jacques, Martin (2012). When China Rules the World: The End of the Western World and the Birth of a New Global Order. New York: Penguin Books.
Katz, Richard (2013). “Mutual Assured Production,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 92, No. 4 (July/August), available at http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/139451/richard-katz/mutual-assured-production.
Lloyd, Peter and Donald Maclaren (2004). “The Gains and Losses from Regional Trading Agreements: A Survey,” Economic Records, Vol. 85, pp. 445–467.
Mann, James (1998). About Face. New York: Knopf.
Manyin, E. Mark, Stephen Daggett, Ben Dolven, Susan V. Lawrence, Michael F. Martin, Ronald O’Rourke, and Bruce Vaughn (2012). “Pivot to the Pacific? Congressional Research Service” (March 28), accessed at http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R42448.pdf.
Mitchell, A. Wess and Jakub J. Grygiel (2013). “America Needs Its Frontline Allies Now More Than Ever,” Wall Street Journal (July 5), A11.
Mouldin, William (2013). “U.S. Trade Talks Gear Up, Putting Heat on China,” Wall Street Journal (July 8), A2.
Nasr, Vali (2013). The Dispensable Nation: American Foreign Policy in Retreat. New York: Doubleday.
Petri, Peter, Michael G. Plummer, and Fan Zhai (2011). “The Trans Pacific Partnership and Asia Pacific Integration: Policy Implications,” East-West Institute for International Economics, Policy brief, No. 119.
Seib, Gerald F. (2013). “Public Turns Skeptical of Wars,” Wall Street Journal (September 17), A6.
Shambaugh, David (2013). China Goes Global. New York: Oxford University Press.
Subramanian, Arvind and Martin Kessler (2012). “The Renminbi Bloc Is Here: Asia Down, the Rest of the World to Go?,” Peterson Institute of International Economics, Working paper series, pp. 12–19.
Sutter, Robert (2013). U.S.-Chinese Relations: Perilous Past, Pragmatic Present, 2nd edition. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Swaine, Michael (2012). “Chinese Leadership and Elite Responses to the U.S. Pacific Pivot,” Chinese Leadership Monitor, No. 38, accessed at http://media.hoover.org/sites/default/files/documents/CLM38MS.pdf.
Tucker, Nancy Berkoff, ed. (2005). Dangerous Strait. New York: Columbia University Press.
Williams, Brick (2013). Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Countries: Comparative Trade and Economic Analysis, Congressional Research Service Report for Congress, R42344.
Xiang, Lanxin (2012). “China and the ‘Pivot’,” Survival, Vol. 54, No. 5, 113–128.
Zhai, Fan (2006). Preferential Trade Agreement in Asia: Alternative Scenario of ‘Hub and Spoke’, Asian Development Bank.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2014 Peter C. Y. Chow
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cheng, Tj., Chow, P.C.Y. (2014). The TPP and the Pivot: Economic and Security Nexus. In: Chow, P.C.Y. (eds) The US Strategic Pivot to Asia and Cross-Strait Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137360779_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137360779_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-47344-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-36077-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Intern. Relations & Development CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)