Skip to main content

The Unwelcome Return: China Reacts to the US Strategic Pivot to Asia

  • Chapter
The US Strategic Pivot to Asia and Cross-Strait Relations
  • 434 Accesses

Abstract

The United States has recently announced a “pivot” or rebalancing strategy toward Asia to crystallize and guide a strategic shift that had already been under way for a few years. From the start, the policy had a particularly hard edge to it, as it dramatized the drastic and targeted nature of the strategic shift against China. How has China reacted to it? This chapter addresses this question with a goal to uncover Washington’s policy change and its impact on the US-China relations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Alastair Iain Johnston, “How New and Assertive Is China’s New Assertiveness,” International Security, Vol. 37, No. 4 (Spring 2013), pp. 7–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lanxin Xiang, “China and the ‘Pivot’,” Survival, Vol. 54, No. 5 (October–November 2012), pp. 113–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aaron Friedberg, A Contest for Supremacy: China, America, and the Struggle for Mastery in Asia (New York: W.W. Norton, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Elizabeth C. Economy and Adam Segal, “The G-2 Mirage: Why the United States and China Are Not Ready to Upgrade Ties,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 88, No. 3 (May/June 2009), pp. 14–23.

    Google Scholar 

  5. On a detailed discussion of “core” and other grades of national interests, see Yang Yi, chief ed., Zhongguo Guojia Anquan Zhanlue Gouxiang (“A Vision of China’s National Security Strategy”) (Beijing: Shishi Chubanshe, 2009), chapter 2.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hillary Clinton’s “Remarks on Internet Freedom” (January 21, 2010), accessed at http://www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2010/01/135519.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  7. For specific restrictions stipulated in the legislation, see Shirley A. Kan, “U.S.-China Military Contacts: Issues for Congress,” Congressional Research Service Report (updated June 17, 2008), accessed via GalleryWatch, pp. 10–11;

    Google Scholar 

  8. Xiong Zhengyan, “China-US Military Relations Develop amid Twists and Turns,” Xinhua (March 1, 2009), Open Source Center (hereafter cited as OSC): CPP20090301138003.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yan Xuetong, “Jiapengyou GuanXi Daozhi Zhongmei Guanxi Buwending” (“‘Fake Friendship’ Causes Instability in the Sino-American Relationship”), at http://news.xinhuanet.com/world/2010–08/03/c_12403602.htm, accessed August 5, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wang Jisi, “Zhongmei Zhongda Zhanlue Jiaoliang Nanyi Bimian” (“Major Strategic Contest between China and the United States Is Hard to Avoid”), at http://news.xinhuanet.com/world/2010–08/05/c_12413222.htm, accessed August 5, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See also Kenneth Lieberthal and Wang Jisi, Addressing U.S.-China Strategic Distrust, John L. Thorton China Center Monograph Series, No. 4 (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, March 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  12. For explication of the powerful pull of bilateralism in US Asia policy, see Ralph A. Cossa, “US Approaches to Multilateral Security and Economic Organizations in the Asia-Pacific,” in Rosemary Foot, S. Neil MacFarlane, and Michael Mastanduno, eds., US Hegemony and International Organizations (New York: Oxford University Press, 2003), pp. 193–214.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. For more recent developments, see Avery Goldstein and Edward D. Mansfield, eds., The Nexus of Economics, Security, and International Relations in East Asia (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bai Jie, et al., “Laying Foundation for Continuing Steady Development of China-US Military Relations,” Xinhua Domestic Service (August 20, 2013), OSC: CHR2013082053199480.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Manus Midlarsky, ed., Handbook of War Studies (Boston: Unwin Hyman, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  16. See also Jack S. Levy, “Long Cycles, Hegemonic Transitions, and the Long Peace,” in Charles W. Kegley, Jr., ed., The Long Postwar Peace: Contending Explanations and Projections (New York: HarperCollins, 1991), pp. 147–176.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Joseph S. Nye, Jr., “American and Chinese Power after the Financial Crisis,” Washington Quarterly, Vol. 33, No. 4 (October 2010), p. 151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Paul Kennedy, The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000 (New York: Random House, 1987), p. 439. Emphasis in original.

    Google Scholar 

  19. On “soft power,” see Mingjiang Li, ed., Soft Power: China’s Emerging Strategy in International Politics (Lanham, MD: Lexington Press, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wu Xinbo, “Understanding the Geopolitical Implications of the Global Financial Crisis,” Washington Quarterly, Vol. 33, No. 4 (October 2010), p. 161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jeffrey A. Bader, Obama and China’s Rise (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2012), pp. 76–77.

    Google Scholar 

  22. On other concerns behind China’s reaffirmation as a “developing country,” see Joshua Eisenman, Eric Heginbotham, and Derek Mitchell, eds., China and the Developing World: Beijing’s Strategy for the Twenty-First Century (Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 2007);

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lowell Dittmer and George T. Yu, eds., China, the Developing World, and the New Global Dynamic (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jacek Kugler and Douglas Lemke, “The Power Transition Research Program: Assessing Theoretical and Empirical Advances,” in Manus I. Midlarsky, ed., Hand of War Studies II (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2000), p. 132. Emphasis in original.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Edward H. Carr, The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919–1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations, 2nd edition (New York: Harper & Row, 1964), p. 209.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Robert Powell, “Absolute and Relative Gains in International Relations Theory,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 85, No. 4 (December 1991), pp. 1303–1320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Peter C. Y. Chow

Copyright information

© 2014 Peter C. Y. Chow

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Deng, Y. (2014). The Unwelcome Return: China Reacts to the US Strategic Pivot to Asia. In: Chow, P.C.Y. (eds) The US Strategic Pivot to Asia and Cross-Strait Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137360779_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics