Abstract
OTA began carrying out formal technology assessments in 1974• 7he procedures for organizing and executing them were refined significantly over the agency’s history. Over time most OTA assessments were initiated by the leadership of congressional committees, although the organic legislation provided other means, including a short-lived attempt to create an “OTA Priorities” list. The urgency of the congressional agenda ultimately hastened a marginalization of the role for TAAC, originally designed as a means for providing external input on the design of prospective technology assessments, as well as essentially abandoning one of the original aspirations of the agency’s designers—assessments focused on long term, early warning of the implications of technology change. In the course of the very first of several OTA assessments, the culture of the agency became such that assessments would articulate the strengths and weaknesses of alternative policy options, often in great detail, but would seldom put forward specific policy recommendations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Office of Technology Assessment, Drug Bioequivalence, NTIS order #PB-244862, July 1974.
Peter D. Blair, “Examining Our Science and Technology Enterprise,” American Scientist, Vol. 85, No. 1 (January/February), 1997, p. 74.
Office of Technology Assessment. 1975. Energy, the Economy, and Mass Transit, NTIS order #PB-250624, October 1975.
John H. Gibbons, “Technology Assessment for the Congress,” The Bridge, National Academy of Engineering, Summer, 1984, pp. 2–8.
Barton Reppert, “OTA Emerges as Nonpartisan Player,” New York Times, January 5, 1988, Federal Page.
See Gregory C. Kunkle, “New Challenge or the Past Revisited? The Office of Technology Assessment in Historical Context,” Technology in Society, Vol. 17, No. 2, 1995, pp. 175–196, reporting on Office of Technology Assessment, “Minutes of the Technology Assessment Board Meeting,” Washington, DC, February 20, 1974, p. 5 and February 2o, 1974> p. 5.
Office of Technology Assessment, “OTA Priorities 1979, With Brief Descriptions of Priorities and of Assessments in Progress,” OTA-P-81, January, 1979.
Copyright information
© 2013 Peter D. Blair
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Blair, P.D. (2013). Startup: Setting the Agenda in OTA’s Early Years. In: Congress’s Own Think Tank: Learning from the Legacy of the Office of Technology Assessment (1972–1995). Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy. Palgrave Pivot, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137359056_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137359056_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-47208-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-35905-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)