Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy ((STIPOL))

  • 113 Accesses

Abstract

OTA began carrying out formal technology assessments in 1974• 7he procedures for organizing and executing them were refined significantly over the agency’s history. Over time most OTA assessments were initiated by the leadership of congressional committees, although the organic legislation provided other means, including a short-lived attempt to create an “OTA Priorities” list. The urgency of the congressional agenda ultimately hastened a marginalization of the role for TAAC, originally designed as a means for providing external input on the design of prospective technology assessments, as well as essentially abandoning one of the original aspirations of the agency’s designers—assessments focused on long term, early warning of the implications of technology change. In the course of the very first of several OTA assessments, the culture of the agency became such that assessments would articulate the strengths and weaknesses of alternative policy options, often in great detail, but would seldom put forward specific policy recommendations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Office of Technology Assessment, Drug Bioequivalence, NTIS order #PB-244862, July 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Peter D. Blair, “Examining Our Science and Technology Enterprise,” American Scientist, Vol. 85, No. 1 (January/February), 1997, p. 74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Office of Technology Assessment. 1975. Energy, the Economy, and Mass Transit, NTIS order #PB-250624, October 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  4. John H. Gibbons, “Technology Assessment for the Congress,” The Bridge, National Academy of Engineering, Summer, 1984, pp. 2–8.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barton Reppert, “OTA Emerges as Nonpartisan Player,” New York Times, January 5, 1988, Federal Page.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See Gregory C. Kunkle, “New Challenge or the Past Revisited? The Office of Technology Assessment in Historical Context,” Technology in Society, Vol. 17, No. 2, 1995, pp. 175–196, reporting on Office of Technology Assessment, “Minutes of the Technology Assessment Board Meeting,” Washington, DC, February 20, 1974, p. 5 and February 2o, 1974> p. 5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Office of Technology Assessment, “OTA Priorities 1979, With Brief Descriptions of Priorities and of Assessments in Progress,” OTA-P-81, January, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2013 Peter D. Blair

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Blair, P.D. (2013). Startup: Setting the Agenda in OTA’s Early Years. In: Congress’s Own Think Tank: Learning from the Legacy of the Office of Technology Assessment (1972–1995). Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy. Palgrave Pivot, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137359056_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics