Abstract
This book began with a detailed examination of the Ramage case (see Introduction). It is arguably one of the most infamous examples of the failings of the provocation defence. This was never clearer than in the Victorian criminal justice system where in the wake of the conviction and sentencing of James Ramage legal practitioners, members of the community and policy makers struggled to understand how a jury in the 21st century could have returned a verdict of manslaughter by reason of provocation, partially excusing the lethal actions committed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Kate Fitz-Gibbon
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fitz-Gibbon, K. (2014). Abolishing Provocation — The Victorian Experience. In: Homicide Law Reform, Gender and the Provocation Defence. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137357557_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137357557_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-47080-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-35755-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)