Skip to main content

Abstract

In founding the research approach known as ethnomethodology, Harold Garfinkel contributed ground-breaking logic and strategies to illuminate the way people jointly construct and make sense of everyday social situations. The prevalence at the time of the search for over-arching theories to predict human behaviour underscores the novelty of Garfinkel’s principles and methods, such as his famous ‘breaching experiments’. Although Garfinkel himself was suspicious of grand theorising, this chapter argues for closer conceptual attention to the shared but hidden meanings that are implicit in social interactions, which are laboriously maintained in interaction, and which make ‘society’ work. Sociology has marginalised social action theories and ethnographic research. Coupling Garfinkel’s methods for analysing ‘real-life’ situations with social action theories, such as symbolic interactionism, actor-network theory and recent incarnations of complexity theory, help guide transferable lessons from empirical research into the way workers co-construct and manage their changing environments in complex organisations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allen, D. (2000) ‘Doing Occupational Demarcation: The “Boundary-Work” of Nurse Managers in a District General Hospital’ Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 29(3): 326–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, D. (2004) ‘Ethnomethodological Insights into Insider-Outsider Relationships in Nursing Ethnographies of Healthcare Settings’ Nursing Inquiry 11(1): 14–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, D.; Griffiths, L. and Lyne, P. (2004) ‘Understanding Complex Trajectories in Health and Social Care Provision’ Sociology of Health and Illness 26(7):1008–1030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, P. (1995) Medical Talk and Medical Work: The Liturgy of the Clinic. Sage: London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, B. (2001) ‘The Macro/Micro Problem of Structure and Agency’ in Pdtzer, G. and Smart, B. (eds.) Handbook of Social Theory. Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA. pp. 339–352.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity (trans. M. Ritter). Sage: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J.; Westbrook, M.T.; Iedema, R.; Mallock, N.A.; Forsyth, R. and Zhang, K. (2005) ‘A Tale of Two Hospitals: Assessing Cultural Landscapes and Compositions’ Social Science and Medicine 60(5):1149-lló2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J.; Clay-Williams, R.; Nugus, P. and Plumb, J. (2013) ‘Healthcare as a Complex Adaptive System’ in Hollnagel, E., Braithwaite, J. and Wears, R. (eds.) Resilient Healthcare. Ashgate Publishing: Surrey, UK. Chapter 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J. and Westbrook, M. (2005) ‘Rethinking Clinical Organisational Structures: An Attitude Survey of Doctors, Nurses and Allied Health Staff in Clinical Directorates’ Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 10(1): 10–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dingwall, R. (1981) ‘The Ethnomethodological Movement’ in Payne, G., Dingwall, R. and Carter, M. (eds.) Sociology and Social Research. Routledge and Kegan Paul: London. pp. 116–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, R. (1990) ‘Talking in Interviews: A Preference for Patient-Initiated Questions in Physician-Patient Encounters’ in Psathas, G. (ed.) Interaction Competence. University Press of America: Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. (2002) Ethnomethodology’s Program: Working Out Durkhám’s Aphorism. (A. Waifield Rawls editor) Rowman and Littlefield: New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerson, E. and Star, S.L. (1986) ‘Analyzing Due Process in the Workplace’ ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems 4(3):257–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greatbatch, D.; Murphy, E. and Dingwall, R. (2001) ‘Evaluating Medical Information Systems: Ethnomethodological and Interactionist Approaches’ Health Services Management Research 14(3):181–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Doubleday and Co: Garden City, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Have, P. Ten (1995) Disposal Negotiations in General Practice Consultations’ in Firth, A. (ed.) The Discourse of Negotiation: Studies of Language in the Workplace. Pergamon: Oxford, UK. pp. 319–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, C. (1986) Body Movement and Speech in Medical Interaction. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heritage, J. (1984) Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Polity: Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heritage, J. (2010) ‘Questioning in Medicine’ in Freed, A. and Ehrlich, S. (eds.) Why Do You Ask? The Function of Questions in Institutional Discourse. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK. pp. 42–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heritage, J. and Maynard, D.W. (eds.) (2006) Communication in Medical Care: Interaction Between Primary Care Physicians and Patients. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Katovich, MA. and Maines, D.R. (2003) ‘Society’ in Reynolds, H. T. and Herman-Kinney, N.J. (eds.) Handbook of Symbolic Interactionism. AltaMira Press: Walnut Creek, CA. pp. 289–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (2008) ‘Actor-Network Theory and Material Semiotics’ in Bryan S. Turner (ed.) The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory. Third edition. Wiley-Blackwell: Oxford. pp. 141–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Letiche, H. (2008) Making Healthcare Care. Information Age Publishing: Charlotte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C.W. (1940) ‘Situated Action and Vocabularies of Motive’ American Sociological Review 5(6):904–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mol, A-M. (2008) The Logic of Care: Health and the Problem of Patient Choice. Routledge Press: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nugus, P. (2008) “The Interactionist Self and Grounded Research: Reflexivity in a Study of Emergency Department Clinicians’ Qualitative Sociology Review 4(1): 189–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nugus, P. and Braithwaite, J. (2010) “The Dynamic Interaction of Quality and Efficiency in the Emergency Department: Squaring the Circle?’ Social Science and Medicine 70(4):511-517

    Google Scholar 

  • Nugus, P.; Bridges, J. and Braithwaite, J. (2009) ‘Selling Patients’ British Medical Journal 339:1444–1446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nugus, P.; Greenfield, D.; Travaglia, J.; Westbrook, J. and Braithwaite, J. (2010) ‘How and Where Clinicians Exercise Power: Interprofessional Relations in Healthcare’ Social Science and Medicine 71(5):898–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nugus, P.; Schoenmakers, A. and Braithwaite, J. (2014) ‘Coordination of Care in Emergency Departments: A Comparative International Ethnography’ in Keating, M.; McDermott, A. and Montgomery, K. (eds.) Patient-Centred Healthcare: Achieving Coordination, Communication and Innovation. Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK. pp. 197–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranmuthugala, G.; Plumb, J.J.; Cunningham, F.C.; Georgiou, A.; Westbrook, J.I. and Braithwaite, J. (2011) ‘How and Why Are Communities of Practice Established in the

    Google Scholar 

  • Healthcare Sector? A Systematic Review of the Literature’ BMC Health Services Research 11:273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H.; Schegloff, E.A. and Jefferson, G. (1974) ‘A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation’ Language 50:696–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, EA. (1986) “The Routine as Achievement’ Human Studies 9:111–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A.; Fagerhaugh, S.; Suczek, B. and Wiener, C. (1985) Social Organization of Medical Work. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudnow, D. (1967) Passing On: The Social Organisation of Dying. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uny, J. (2003) Global Complexity. Polity: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vryan, K.D.; Adler, P. and Adler, P. (2003) ‘Identity’ in Reynolds, L. and Herman-Kinney, N. (eds.) Handbook of Symbolic Interactionism. Alta Mira Press: Walnut Creek, CA. pp.367-390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warfield Rawls, A. (2008) ‘Harold Garfinkel, Ethnomethodology and Workplace Studies’ Organization Studies 29(5):701–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Peter Nugus and Jeffrey Braithwaite

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nugus, P., Braithwaite, J. (2015). Harold Garfinkel: Lessons on Emergent Behaviours in Complex Organisations. In: Collyer, F. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Social Theory in Health, Illness and Medicine. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137355621_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics