Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Open versus Closed Innovation: Speculating about the Future of Technology Management

  • Chapter
Unpacking Open Innovation

  • 208 Accesses

Abstract

Nowadays, in the global economy scenario, technology is fundamental; it covers every aspect of our lives and has substantially altered the way people relate to one another and do business (Del Giudice et al., 2012; Carayannis, 2009). Moreover, the velocity with which technology has developed and spread worldwide is amazing and its rate does not seem to decrease (Chesbrough, 2003; Itami et al., 2010) (figure 2.1).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Badawy, M. K. A Research architecture for technology management education, A three volume handbook of technology management: Key concepts, financial tools and techniques. Operations and Innovation Management, vol. 1, New York: Wiley (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, E. Ideas on the edge, interview: Eric von Hippel. CIO Insight (Winter): 12–18 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendrath, R., & Mueller, M. L. The end of the net as we know it? Deep packet inspection and internet governance. New Media Society, 1142–1160 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigwood, Michael P. Managing the new technology exploitation process. Research-Technology Management, November–December: 38 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowonder, B., & Miyake, T. Technology management: A knowledge ecologyperspective, International Journal of Technology Management, 19 (7/8): 662–684 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caban, J. J., Joshi, A., & Nagy, P. Rapid development of medical imaging tools with open-source libraries. The Journal of Digital Imaging, 20 (Suppl 1): 83–93 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E., & Campbell, D. “Mode 3” and “quadruple helix”: Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46 (3/4) (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E. G. Fostering synergies between information technology and managerial and organizational cognition: The role of knowledge management. Technovation, 19 (4): 219–231 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E. G. The strategic management of technological learning: Learn-ing to learn-how-to-learn in high tech firms and its impact on the strategic management of knowledge. Innovation and Creativity within and Across Firms. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayannis, E. G. Firm evolution dynamics: Towards sustainable entrepreneurship and robust competitiveness in the knowledge econ-omy and society. International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, 1 (3): 235–254 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Channin, D. S. Driving market-driven engineering. Radiology, 229 (2): 311–313 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, R., & Jonard, N. Network structure and the diffusion of knowledge. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 28 (8): 1557–1575 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danneels, Erwin. Disruptive technology reconsidered: A critique and research agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21 (4): 246–258 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Giudice, M., Della Peruta, M. R., & Carayannis, E. Cross-Cultural Knowledge Management: Fostering Innovation and Collaboration inside the Multicultural Enterprise, New York: Springer (2012).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Diericks, I., & Cool, K. Asset stock accumulation and the sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35 (12): 1504–1511 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, B. J., Langer, S., & Nagy, P. The role of open-source software in innovation and standardization in radiology. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 2 (11): 927–931 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleck, J. Contingent knowledge and technology development. Technology Analysis Strategic Management, 9 (4): 383–397 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R., & Goodnight, J. Managing for creativity. Harvard Business Review (July–August) (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Floyd, C. Managing Technology for Corporate Success. Aldershot: Gower (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Franke, N., von Hippel, E., & Schreier, M. Finding commercially attractive user innovations: A test of lead-user theory. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23: 301–315 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaynor, G. H. (Ed.) Handbook of Technology Management. New York: McGraw-Hill (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Georghiou, L., & Keenan, M. Evaluation of national foresight activities: Assessing rationale, process and impact. Technological Forecasting Social Change, 73: 761–777 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilsing, V., Nooteboom, B., Vanhaverbeke, W., Duysters, G., & van den Oord, A. Network embeddedness and the exploration of novel technologies: Technological distance, betweenness centrality and density. Research Policy, 37 (10): 1717–1731 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. M. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 109–122 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GU, S., & Lundvall, B-Å. Policy learning as a key process in the transformation of the Chinese Innovation Systems. In Lundvall, B-Å., Intarakumnerd, P., & Vang, J. (Eds.) Asian Innovation Systems in Transition. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd: (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. Competing for the Future. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Itami, H., Kusunoki, K., & Numagami, T., et al. (Eds.). Dynamics of Knowledge, Corporate Systems and Innovation. Springer (2010).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kilduff, M., & Tsai, W. Social Networks and Organisations. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M. S., & Park, Y. The changing pattern of industrial technology linkage structure of Korea: Did the ICT industry play a role in the 1980s and 1990s? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76 (5): 688–699 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knoben, J., Oerlemans, L. A. G., & Rutten, R. P. J. H. Radical changes in inter-organizational network structures: The longitudinal gap. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73(4): 390–404 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoke, D., & Kuklinski, J. Network Analysis. London: Sage (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leenders, R. T., Van Engelen, J. M. L., & Kratzer, J. Virtuality, communication, and new product team creativity: A social network perspective. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 20 (1–2): 69–92 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard-Barton, D. Wellsprings of Knowledge—Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation, Boston: Harvard Business School Press (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leoncini, R., & Montresor, S. Accounting for core and extra-core relationships in technological systems: A methodological proposal. Research Policy, 34 (1): 83–100 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leoncini, R., Maggioni, M. A., & Montresor, S. Intersectoral innovation flows and national technological systems: Network analysis for comparing Italy and Germany. Research Policy, 25 (3): 415–430 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lester, R. K., & Piore M. J. Innovation: The Missing Dimension. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., & Leckenby, J. D. Examining the effectiveness of internet advertising formats. In Schumann, D. W., & Thorson, E. (Ed.) Internet Advertising—Theory and Research ( First edition, 203–224 ). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, P. The Management of Technology: Perception and Opportunities. United Kingdom: Chapman & Hall (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Madhavan, R., & Grover, R. From embedded knowledge to embodied knowledge: New product development as knowledge management. Journal of Marketing, 62: 1–12 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meeus, M. T. H., Oerlemans, L. A. G., & Kenis, P. Inter-organisational networks and innovation, In Nooteboom, B., & Stam, E. (Eds.) Micro-Foundations for Innovation Policy, Amsterdam: University Press (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, D. F., Morrison, P. D., & Roberts, J. H. The effect of network structure in industrial diffusion processes. Research Policy, 21 (6): 533–552 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mina, A., Ramlogan, R., Tampubolon, G., & Metcalfe, J. S Mapping evolutionary trajectories: Applications to the growth and transformation of medical knowledge. Research Policy, 36 (5): 789–806 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mowery, D. C., Oxley, J. E., & Silverman, B. S Technological overlap and interfirm cooperation: Implications for the resource-based view of the firm. Research Policy, 27 (5): 507–523 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Business Review, November–December: 96–104 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. Policy Brief: Open Innovation in Global Networks. Paris: OECD (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelc, K. I. Patterns of knowledge generating networks. Proceedings of the Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), Portland, July 27–31 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratib, O., Swiernik, M., & McCoy, J. M. From PACS to integrated EMR. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, 27 (2–3): 207–215 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers., & Everett, M. The Diffusion of Innovations. New York: The Free Press (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roussel, P. A., Saad, K. N., & Erickson, T. J. Third Generation RD—Managing the Link to Corporate Strategy. Boston: Harvard Business School Press (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneidermann, B., Fischer, G., Czerwinski, M., et al. Creativity support tools: Report from a US National Science Foundation sponsored workshop. Journal of Human-ComputerInteraction, 20 (2): 61–77 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sepetys, K., & Cox, A. China: Intellectual Property Rights Protection in China: Trends in Litigation and Economic Damages. NERA Economic Consulting (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shih, H. Y. Contagion effects of electronic commerce diffusion: Perspective from network analysis of industrial structure. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75 (1): 78–90 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, J., & Helferich, J. Social network analysis can help managers build better connections between support groups and their customers. Research Technology Management, 51 (1): 49–57 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stata, R. Organizational learning—the key to management innovation, Sloan Management Review, Spring (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele, L. W. Managing Technology: The Strategic View. New York: McGraw-Hill (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, G., Pisano, G., & Shuen, R. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 509–533 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. Collective dynamics of small-world networks. Nature, 393 (6684): 409–410 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt, B. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5: 171–180 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whipp, R. Managing technological changes: Opportunities and pitfalls. International Journal of Vehicle Design, 12 (5/6): 469–477 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K. Y., & O’Reilly, C. A. Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Research in Organizational Behavior, 20: 77–140 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Winograd, T. Introduction. In Bringing Design to Software. New York: ACM Press (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • WRR. Innovatie vernieuwd: Opening in viervoud. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, (2008).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Elias G. Carayannis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Copyright information

© 2013 Elias G. Carayannis, Manlio Del Giudice, and Maria Rosaria Della Peruta

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Carayannis, E.G. (2013). Open versus Closed Innovation: Speculating about the Future of Technology Management. In: Unpacking Open Innovation. Palgrave Studies in Democracy, Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Growth. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137354372_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation