Skip to main content

Minimal Theism and Naturalism

  • Chapter
The Best Argument against God
  • 231 Accesses

Abstract

We set out the central material of the book: a detailed comparison of the theoretical merits of Minimal Theism and Minimal Naturalism. We start with a comparison of our two theories prior to the introduction of data, and then go on to consider, in turn, global causal structure; cosmic fine-tuning; the history of the earth; the history of humanity; a priori knowledge; morality and human flourishing; consciousness and reason; religious experience; and scripture, authority, organisation and tradition. We argue that, prior to the introduction of data, naturalism trumps theism on grounds of simplicity and that none of the data that we consider favours theism over naturalism. We conclude that, given the data considered, naturalism wins.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and further reading

  • On ontological arguments: Graham Oppy (1996) Ontological Arguments and Belief in God Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Graham Oppy (2006) Arguing about Gods Cambridge: Cambridge University

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Press; Kevin Harrelson (2009) The Ontological Argument from Descartes to Hegel Amherst: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • On cosmological arguments: William Rowe (1975) The Cosmological Argument Princeton: Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • William Lane Craig (1979) The Cosmological Argument from Plato to Leibniz London: Macmillan

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander Pruss (2006) The Principle of Sufficient Reason: A Reassessment Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • On teleological arguments: Neil Manson (ed.) (2003) God and Design: The Teleological Argument and Modern Science London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • On cosmic fine-tuning arguments: John Leslie (1989) Universes London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Roger White (2000) ‘Fine-Tuning and Multiple Universes’ Noûs 34, 260–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • On biological arguments: William Paley (2006) Natural Theology, Matthew Eddy and David Knight (eds) Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • William Dembski and Michael Ruse (eds) (2004) Debating Design: From Darwin to DNA Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • On miracles: Richard Swinburne (ed.) (1989) Miracles New York: Macmillan

    Google Scholar 

  • John Earman (2000) Hume’s Abject Failure: The Argument against Miracles Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alan Hájek (2008) ‘Are Miracles Chimerical?’ Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion 1, 82–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • On morality and human flourishing: Gregory Paul (2005) ‘Cross-National Correlations of Quantifiable Societal Health with Popular Religiosity and Secularism in the Prosperous Democracies’ Journal of Religion and Society 7, 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Phil Zuckermann (2008) Society without God: What the Least Religious Nations Can Tell Us about Contentment New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • On consciousness and reason: Robert Adams (1987) ‘Flavors, Colors, and God’ in his The Virtue of Faith and other Essays in Philosophical Theology Oxford: Oxford University Press, 243–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Victor Reppert (2003) C. S. Lewis’ Dangerous Idea: In Defense of the Argument from Reason Downer’s Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • For zombies: David Chalmers (1996) The Conscious Mind Oxford: Oxford University

    Google Scholar 

  • Press. For System 1 and System 2: Daniel Kahnemann (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • On religious experience: Rudolf Otto (1958) The Idea of the Holy, second edition Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • William James (1960) The Varieties of Religious Experience London: Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey Schloss and Michael Murray (eds) (2009) The Believing Primate: Scientific, Philosophical and Theological Reflections on the Origins of Religion Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2013 Graham Oppy

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Oppy, G. (2013). Minimal Theism and Naturalism. In: The Best Argument against God. Palgrave Pivot, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137354143_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics