Skip to main content
  • 221 Accesses

Abstract

We characterise theism and naturalism, and provide an account of the method that we use to provide a comparative assessment of them. In particular, we discuss theoretical virtues — simplicity, goodness of fit, explanatory breadth and predictive fruitfulness — and their role in the assessment of the comparative virtues of theories; and we also consider the role that the theoretical virtues might play in an argument for the conclusion that one theory dominates another on the available evidence. We conclude with a brief account of the properties of successful arguments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and further reading

  • On the characterisation of theism: Graham Oppy (2009) ‘Gods’ Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion 2, 231–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • For contrast: Jordan Howard Sobel (2004) Logic and Theism Cambridge: Cambridge University

    Google Scholar 

  • Press; Richard Swinburne (1979) The Existence of God Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • On method and theoretical virtue: Daniel Nolan (1997) ‘Quantitative Parsimony’ British Journal for Philosophy of Science 48, 483, 329–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • For a contrasting view: Scott Shalkowski (1997) ‘Theoretical Virtues and Theological Construction’ International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 41, 71–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • On theory of argumentation: Graham Oppy (2011) ‘Über die Aussichten erfolgreicher Beweise für Theismus oder Atheismus’ (‘Prospects for Successful Proofs of Theism or Atheism’) in Joachim Bromand und Guido Kreis (eds) Gottesbeweise von Anselm bis Gödel (Arguments for the Existence of God from Anselm to Gödel) Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • For a contrasting view: Stephen Davis (1997) God, Reason and Theistic Proofs Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2013 Graham Oppy

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Oppy, G. (2013). Preliminary Matters. In: The Best Argument against God. Palgrave Pivot, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137354143_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics