Moral panics about youth sexuality have heavily influenced the construction and curriculum of sexual health education, as the long and complicated history of sex ed in United States schools continues to plague political campaigns, school boards, parents, and health advo- cates (Irvine 2004; Moran 2002; Di Mauro and Joffe 2009). Since the early responses to the moral panics about venereal diseases that began in the early twentieth century, there has been a significant narrowing of the opportunities for young people to receive any type of compre- hensive sexual education. Truly, sex education has been shrouded in debate that is characterized by panic, fueled by misinformation, and cloaked in the language of morality. This chapter explores a brief his- tory of sex education in the United States, focusing specifically on the rise of Abstinence-Only Sexual Education (AOSE) as a moral panic about youth sexuality, followed by an analysis of media representations about adolescent sexual experiences presented in the popular television show Glee. This chapter examines the discontinuity between the formal curriculum young people receive through AOSE programs and the informal education they receive from popular culture references, linking those sites as relevant to the politics of how moral panics are both created and sustained. Using Glee, this chapter shows how moral panics about youth sexuality are still heavily problematic in American culture and demonstrates how popular television has the ability to both challenge and duplicate dangerous stereotypes about young people and sex.
- Young People
- Premature Ejaculation
- Moral Discourse
- Moral Panic
- Adolescent Sexuality
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Curiously, in the U.S. education system seldom is it affirmed that the primary goal of sexuality educa- tion is the right of youth to know about human sexuality—nor is it understood as an inherent “right to know.” This inadequacy has historical roots in the long-standing attitude among adults that in setting educational objectives for youth concerning sexuality their primary responsibility, whether in their capacity as parent, teacher, or administrator, is to protect youth from potential harm as opposed to providing youth with appropriate services and sufficient information with which to make decisions and protect themselves.
(Di Mauro and Joffe 2009, 74)
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use onlyLearn about institutional subscriptions
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
American Psychological Association (APA). 2007. Report of the APA task force of the sexualization of girls. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Ashcraft, Catherine. 2006. Ready or not...? Teen sexuality and the troubling discourse of readiness. Anthropology ana Education Quarterly 37: 328–346.
Brown, Jane. 2002. Mass media influences on sexuality. The Journal of Sex Research 39: 42–45.
Cooper, Evan. 2003. Decoding Will ana Grace: Mass audience reception of a popular network situation comedy. Sociological Perspectives 46: 513–533.
Di Mauro, Diane and Carole Joffe. 2009. The religious right and the reshaping of sexual policy: Reproductive rights and sexuality education during the Bush years. In Moral panics, sex panics: Fear ana the fight over sexual rights, edited by G. Herdt. 47–104. New York: New York University Press.
Fields, Jessica. 2008. Risky lessons: Sex education and social inequality. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.
Fine, Michelle. 1988. Sexuality, schooling, and adolescent females: The missing discourse of desire. Harvard Educational Review 58: 29–53.
Fine, Michelle and Sara I. McClelland. 2006. Sexuality education and desire: Still missing after all these years. Harvard Educational Review 76: 297–338.
Fisher, Christopher. 2009. Queer youth experiences with abstinence-only-until-marriage sexuality education: “I can’t get married so where does that leave me”? Journal ofLGBT Youth 6: 61–79.
Garcia, Lorena. 2009. Now why do you want to talkabout that? Heteronormativity sexism and racism in the sexual (mis)education of Latina youth. Gender & Society 23: 520–541.
Garland, David. 2008. On the concept of moral panic. Crime, Media, CultureA: 9-30.
Greenwood, Dana and Linda M. Isbell. 2002. Ambivalent sexism and the dumb blonde: Men’s and women’s reactions to sexist jokes. Psychology of Women Quarterly 26: 341–350.
Grossman, Arnold, A. P. Haney P. Edwards, E. J, Alessi, M. Ardon, and T. J. Howell. 2009. Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender youth talk about experiences and coping with school violence: a qualitative study. Journal of LGBT Youth 6: 24–60.
Guttmacher Institute. 2001. The Guttmacher Report on public policy. 4(1): 9–13. Washington, DC: Guttmacher Institute.
Herdt, Gilbert, ed. 2009. Moral panics, sex panics: Fear and the fight over sexual rights. New York: New York University Press.
Hill Collins, Patricia. 2009. Another kind of public education: Race, schools, the media and democratic possibilities. Boston: Beacon Press.
Irvine, Janice. 2004. Talk about sex: The battles over sex education in the United States. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Jayson. Sharon. “Obama budget cuts funds for abstinence-only sex education.” USA Today. May 11, 2009. http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2009–05-ll-abstinence-only_N.htm.
Jenkins, Philip. 2001. Beyond tolerance: Child pornography on the internet. New York: New York University Press.
Keller, Sarah and Jane Brown. 2002. Media interventions to promote responsible sexual behavior. The Journal of Sex Research 39: 67–72.
Lamb, Sharon. 2008. The “right” sexuality for girls. The Chronicle Review of Higher Education 54: B12-B15.
Levin, Judith. 2002. Harmful to minors: The perils of protecting children from sex. Cambridge: Da Capo Press.
Luker, Kristen. 2006. When sex goes to school: Warring views on sex—and sex education—since the sixties. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Moran, Jeffrey. 2002. Teaching sex: The shaping of adolescence in the 20th century. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Orr, Margaret Terry. 1982. Sex education and contraceptive education in U.S. public high schools. Family Planning Perspectives 14: 304–313.
Pappademas, Alex. “Glee gone wild.” GQ Magazine. (New York, NY) November 2010. http://www.gq.com/entertainment/movies-and-tv/201011/glee-photos-rachel-quinn-finn#slide=l.
Radway, Janice. 1991. Reading the romance: Women, patriarchy and popular literature. Chapel-Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Regnerus, Mark. 2007. Forbidden fruit: Sex and religion in the lives of American teenagers. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rich, Adrienne. 1986. Bread, blood and poetry. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.
Santelli, John, Mary A. Ott, Maureen Lyon, Jennifer Rogers, Daniel Summers, and Rebecca Schleifer. 2006. Abstinence and abstinence-only education: A review of U.S. policies and programs. Journal of Adolescent Health 38: 72–81.
Somers, Cheryl L., and Amy T. Surman. 2005. Sources and timing of sex education: relations with American adolescent sexual attitudes and behavior. Educational Review 57: 37–54.
Thompson, Kenneth. 1998. Moral panics. London: Routledge.
Vance, Carole. 1993. Pleasure and danger: Exploring female sexuality. Ontario: Pandora Press.
Waites, Matthew. 2005. The age of consent: Young people, sexuality and citizenship. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Weis, Lois. 2000. Learning to speak out in an abstinence based sex education group: Gender and race work in an urban magnet school. Teachers College Record 102: 620–650.
Editors and Affiliations
© 2013 Sarah Prior
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Prior, S. (2013). Scary Sex: The Moral Discourse of Glee. In: Fahs, B., Dudy, M.L., Stage, S. (eds) The Moral Panics of Sexuality. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137353177_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-46958-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-35317-7