Skip to main content
  • 130 Accesses

Abstract

In the United States, between 1995 and 2000, there was a 450 percent increase in private sector prisons (compared with a 22 percent and 29 percent increase in state and federal prisons, respectively). In 2000, “the Bureau of Prisons privatized 3,300 beds having an estimated [lucrative] value of $760 million over a 10-year period.”1 By 2007, there were 140 private prisons in the United States holding over 65,000 inmates.2 By August 2009, Corrections Corporation of America, the largest publically traded US prison operator, ran 65 facilities in 19 states and housed about 77,000 inmates, holding approximately “8 percent of the states’ and federal government’s inmates, up from less than 6 percent at the start of the decade.” “Correction Corp., which has about half the market share of privately-managed prison beds in the United States … reported better-than-expected quarterly profits,” and its CEO stated, “private prison operators will grow their market share in coming years.”3 Most of the for-profit prisoners are poor, as 8 of every 10 inmates housed in these facilities in 2007 were from the lowest income levels.4 Many inmates are drawn from the 27.4 percent of blacks living in poverty (as of 2010).5

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Curtis R. Blakely (2005), America’s Prisons: The Movement toward Profit and Privatization (Boca Raton, FL: Brown Walker Press), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nicki Zieminski (2009), “Private Prisons Seen Taking More U.S. Inmates,” Thomas Reuters, August 20, http://www.reuters.com/article/2009/08/20/businesspro-us-correctionscorp-outlook-i-idUSTRE57J5CO20090820.

    Google Scholar 

  3. National Poverty Center (2010), “Poverty in the United States; Frequently Asked Questions,” accessed February 4, 2013, http://www.npc.umich.edu/poverty.

    Google Scholar 

  4. E. Ann Carson and William J. (2012), “Prisoners in 2011,” U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics, December, NCJ 239808, 34 pages, www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cj5da_2011.pdf-64k-2012–04–23.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Michel Foucault (1977), Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (New York: Vintage Books).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cora Daniels (2007), Ghettonation: A Journey into the Land of Bling and the Home of the Shameless (New York: Three Rivers Press), 156.

    Google Scholar 

  7. bell hooks (2004), We Real Cool: Black Men and Masculinity (New York: Routledge), 39.

    Google Scholar 

  8. William H. Cosby Jr. and Alvin F. Poussaint, M.D. (2007), Come On, People: On the Path from Victims to Victors (Nashville: Thomas Nelson Inc.).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stuart Hirschberg (1996), Strategies of Argument, 2nd ed. (Boston: Allyn and Bacon).

    Google Scholar 

  10. William Lutz quoted in Steve Eliason, “Language and the Social Construction of Reality: Spinning Social Reality with Euphemisms,” Montana State University, Billings, Unpublished paper, 65. http://www.minotstateu.edu/research/Euphemism_paper.pdf. Original source referenced by Eliason is William Lutz (2000), “Nothing in Life Is Certain except Negative Patient Care Outcome and Revenue Enhancement,” Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy 44: 230–33.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Barbara H. Chasin (2004), Inequality and Violence in the United States: Casualties of Capitalism (Amherst, NY: Humanity Books), 212.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Patricia Hill Collins (2004), Black Sexual Politics: African Americans, Gender, and the New Racism (New York: Routledge), 6.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Douglas S. Massey (2008), Categorically Unequal: The American Stratification System (New York: Russell Sage Foundation Publications), 101.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Christian Parenti ([1999] 2009), Lockdown America: Police, Prisons and Prisons in the Age of Crisis (New York: Verso), 6–8.

    Google Scholar 

  15. National Poverty Center (2010), “Poverty facts,” The University of Michigan Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy, http://npc.umich.edu/poverty.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jabari Asim (2007), The N Word: Who Can Say It, Who Shouldn’t, and Why (New York: Houghton Mifflin Company), 221.

    Google Scholar 

  17. LILWAYNEHQ (2011), “Lil Wayne Covers Rolling Stone Magazine (2011),” http://www.lilwaynehq.com/2011/01/lil-wayne-covers-rolling-stone-magazine-2011.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cam’ron (2002), Come Home with Me, CD, track 3, “Oh Boy” (USA: Roc-a-Fella).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Elijah Anderson (2000), Code of the Street: Decency, Violence, and the Moral Life of the Inner City (New York: W. W. Norton).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jay-Z (1999). Vol. 3 … Life and Times of S. Carter (Roc-A-Fella Records, Subsidiary of Universal Music Group, distributed by The Island Def Jam Music Group) July 28, vol. 26, 26–30.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Prince.org, Online Fan Community (2013). “The Pimp Look Is in, the Thug Look Is Out.,” June 3, http://prince.org/msg/100/56467?pr.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jennifer D. Angelo (2003), “Pop Culture Pimps Out,” September 17, 2, http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,97519,00.html.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Susan Adams (2010), “Pimp My Cubicle,” Forbes.com, August 27, http://www.forbes.com/2010/08/26/cubicle-decorating-workspace-leadership-careers-office.html.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mike Parker (2006), “Protesters Bash Pimp and Ho Halloween Party,” October 23, http://cbs2chicago.com/topstories/local_story_296194147.html.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wolfgang Fritz Haug ([1971] 1986), Critique of Commodity Aesthetics: Appearance, Sexuality and Advertising in Capitalist Society (Lansing, MI: University of Minnesota Press), 8.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Madan Sarup and Tasneem Raja (1996), Identity, Culture and the Postmodern World (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press), 123.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Stephen Lyng (ed.; 2004), Edgework: The Sociology of Risk-Taking (New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  28. David Matlin (2005), Prisons: Inside the New America: From Vernooykill Creek to Abu Ghraib (Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Books).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Naomi Klein (2007), The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism (New York: Metropolitan Books), 6.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Howard Zinn (2005), A People’s History of the United States (New York: Harper Perennial Modern Classics), 275.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Douglas A. Blackmon (2009), Slavery by Another Name: The Re-Enslavement of Black Americans from the Civil War to World War II (New York: Anchor).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Huff Post STYLE (2012), “Adidas ‘Shackle’ Sneakers Cause Controversy over Slavery Symbolism (PHOTO, POLL),” June 16, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/18/adidas-shackle-sneakers-controversy_n_1605661.html.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2013 Karen Bettez Halnon

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Halnon, K.B. (2013). Prison Chic. In: The Consumption of Inequality. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137352491_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics