Advertisement

Controlling or Empowering Non-Profit Organisations?: Dimensions of Accountability in Singapore

  • Ora-orn Poocharoen
  • Fazlin Abdullah
Part of the IIAS Series: Governance and Public Management book series (GPM)

Abstract

Most governments struggle to design accountability systems to govern non-profit organisations (NPOs) that strike an appropriate balance between regulating sound management practices and the autonomy of NPOs. Drawing on the case of Singapore, we ask how the government ensures that NPOs are accountable and how do NPOs perceive these mechanisms. Is there too much control? Or are there gaps to fill to ensure accountability? Via accountability mechanisms are these NPOs being manufactured and shaped by the government? Are we missing certain aspects of accountability that will ensure effectiveness of NPOs?

Keywords

Corporate Social Responsibility Civil Society Board Member Fiduciary Duty Human Resource Practice 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anheier, H. K. (2004) Civil Society: Measurement, Evaluation, Policy (London; Sterling, VA: Earthscan Publications).Google Scholar
  2. Anheier, H. K. (2010) ‘What Kind of Nonprofit Sector, What Kind of Society? Comparative Policy Reflections’, in K. J. Hopt, T. Von Hippel (eds), Comparative Corporate Governance of Non-Profit Organisations, 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnstein, S. R. (1969) ‘A Ladder of Citizen Participation’, American Institure of Planning Journal 35(4), 216–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Avina, J. (1993) ‘The Evolutionary Life Cycles of Non-Governmental Development Organizations’, Public Administration & Development 13(5), 453–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baur, D., Schmitz, H. P. (2012) ‘Corporations and NGOs: When Accountability Leads to Co-optation’, Journal of Business Ethics, 106, 9–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bendana, A. (2006) ‘Ngos and Social Movements: A North/South Divide? In United Nations Research Institute for Social Development’, Civil Society and Social Movements. Program Paper Number 22, http://www.rrojasdatabank.info/Bendana.pdf. Accessed 22 November 2013.Google Scholar
  7. Chambers, R. (1994) ‘Ngos and Development: Performance and Accountability in the “New World Order”’, in SCF/IDPM Workshop on NGOs and Development (Manchester).Google Scholar
  8. Charity Council (2011) Charity Governance Report 2011. Singapore.Google Scholar
  9. Chong, T. (2005) ‘Civil Society in Singapore: Popular Discourses and Concepts’, Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia 20(2), 273–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chong, T., Elies, S. (2011) An Asean Community for All: Exploring the Scope for Civil Society Engagement (Singapore: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Office for Regional Cooperation in Asia).Google Scholar
  11. Chua, B. H. (2005) ‘Constrained Ngos and Arrested Democratization in Singapore’, in P. W. Robert (eds), Civil Life, Globalization and Political Change in Asia, 171 (Routledge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Commissioner of Charities (2010) ‘To Develop a Well-Governed and Thriving Charity Sector with Strong Public Support’, in Commissioner of Charities, Commissioner of Charities Annual Report (Singapore). Available at http://www.charities.gov.sg/Documents/COC_Annual_Report_2010.pdf.Google Scholar
  13. Ebrahim, A. (2003) ‘Accountability in Practice: Mechanisms for NGOs’, World Development 31(5), 813–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ebrahim, A. (2005) ‘Accountability Myopia: Losing Sight of Organisational Learning’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 24(1), 56–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Edwards, M., Hulme, D. (eds) (1996) Beyond the Magic Bullet: Ngo Performance and Accountability in the Post Cold War World (Connecticut: Kumarian Press Inc.).Google Scholar
  16. Gray, R., Bebbington, J., Collison, D. (2006) ‘Ngos, Civil Society and Accountability: Making the People Accountable to Capital’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 19(3), 319–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Haque, S. M. (2004) ‘Governance and Bureaucracy in Singapore: Contemporary Reforms and Implications’, International Political Science Review 25(2), 227–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Head, B. (1991) ‘Regulation or Deregulation’, in B. Head, E. McCoy (eds), Deregulation or Better Regulation? Issues for the Public Sector (Melbourne: Macmillan Company of Australia).Google Scholar
  19. Jordan, L., Van Tuijl, P. (ed.) (2006) Ngo Accountability (London: Earthscan).Google Scholar
  20. Kilby, P. (2006) ‘Accountability for Empowerment: Dilemmas Facing Non-Governmental Organizations’, World Development 34(6), 951–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Koh, G., Ooi, G. L. (2004) ‘Relationship Between State and Civil Society in Singapore: Clarifying the Concepts, Assessing the Ground’, in Lee Hock Guan (ed.), Civil Society in Southeast Asia (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies), 167–197.Google Scholar
  22. Ling, S. L. (1998) ‘Health Care of the Elderly in Singapore’, Singapore Medical Journal 39(10), 435–436.Google Scholar
  23. Lloyd, R. (2005) ‘The Role of Ngo Self-Regulation in Increasing Stakeholder Accountability’ (London: One World Trust).Google Scholar
  24. Lloyd, R., Calvo, V., Laybourn, C. (2010) ‘Ensuring Credibility and Effectiveness: Designing Compliance Systems in CSO Self-Regulation’, in One World Trust Briefing Paper Number 127 (London: One World Trust).Google Scholar
  25. Mulgan, R. (2000) ‘“Accountability”’: An Ever-Expanding Concept?’, Public Administration 78(3), 555–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Neher, C. D. (1994) ‘Asian Style Democracy’, Asian Survey 34(11), 949–961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Poocharoen, O., Ting, B. (2013) ‘Collaboration, Co-production, Networks: Convergence of theories’. Public Management Review, (ahead-of-print), 1–28.Google Scholar
  28. Salamon, L. M., Anheier, H. K. (1997) ‘Defining the Nonprofit Sector: A Cross-National Analysis’ (Manchester: Manchester University Press).Google Scholar
  29. Tanaka, Y. (2002) ‘Singapore — Subtle Ngo Control by a Developmentalist Welfare State’, in S. Shigetomi (eds), Ngos and the State (Singapore: Institute of South East Asian Studies).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Ora-orn Poocharoen and Fazlin Abdullah 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ora-orn Poocharoen
  • Fazlin Abdullah

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations