Skip to main content

Evolution and the Deep Past: Intrinsic Responses to Synthetic Biology

  • Chapter
Ethics and Emerging Technologies
  • 2656 Accesses

Chapter Summary

Because synthetic biology involves creating novel forms of life using genomic material drawn from multiply species of organisms it raises several intrinsic ethical objections (i.e. concerns based on the technology itself, rather than its impacts) having to do with crossing species boundaries and “play God.” In this chapter, Christopher J. Preston argues that intrinsic concerns regarding synthetic biology should not be treated as lightly as they often are by proponents of the technology, since they are quite widely held. He then discusses several different types of intrinsic objections. He argues that some of them, including those based on the sanctity of species boundaries, are not very well justified. However, he believes that there may be a compelling argument to be made against synthetic organisms based on the fact that they are constructed de novo, rather than produced by descent with modification from prior organisms. Therefore, unlike all other organisms, they do not have a continuous causal connection to historical evolutionary processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Works Cited

  • J. Boldt and O. Müller (2008) ‘Newtons of the Leaves of Grass’ Nature Biotechnology 26,4, 387–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Comstock (1998) ‘Is it Unnatural to Genetically Engineer Plants?’ Weed Science 46, 647–651.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Comstock (2010) ‘Ethics and Genetically Modified Food’ in F. Gottwald, ed. Food Ethics (Dordrecht: Springer), pp. 49–66.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • C. Darwin (1898) The Origin of Species, By Means of Natural Selection, Vol. 1. (New York: Appleton and Company).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Deckers (2005) ‘Are Scientists Right and Non-scientists wrong? Reflections on Discussions of GM’, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 18, 451–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Deplazes-Zemp (2012) ‘The Moral Impact of Synthesising Living Organisms: Biocentric Views on Synthetic Biology’, Environmental Values, 21, 63–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Elliot (1982) ‘Faking Nature’, Inquiry, 25,1, 81–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Endy (2008, February 19) ‘Life, What a Concept (Part III)’ Edge 237 http://www.edge.org/documents/archive/edge237.html, date accessed 8 March 2012.

  • G. Gaskell (1997) ‘Europe Ambivalent on Biotechnology’, Nature, vol. 387, 26 June: 845–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W. Gibbs (2004, April 26) ‘Synthetic Life’, Scientific American. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=synthetic-life, date accessed 8 March 2012.

  • D. Gibson, J. Glass, C. Lartigue, V. Noskov, R. Chuang, M. Algire, … J. Venter (2010) ‘Creation of a Bacterial Cell Controlled by a Chemically Synthesized Genome’, Science 329,5987, 52–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Hargrove (1996) The Foundations of Environmental Ethics (Denton, TX: Environmental Ethics Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart Research Associates (2010) Awareness and Impressions of Synthetic Biology. http://www.synbioproject.org/process/assets/files/6456/hart_revised_.pdf?, date accessed 14 April 2012.

  • ISAAA (International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications) (2011) ‘Global Status of the World’s Biotech/GM Crops’, http://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/briefs/43/default.asp, date accessed 4 March 2012.

  • JVCI (J Craig Venter Institute) (2010, May 10) ‘First Self-Replicating Synthetic Bacterial Cell’, Press Release, http://www.jcvi.org/cms/press/press-releases/full-text/article/first-self-replicating-synthetic-bacterial-cell-constructed-by-j-craig-venter-institute-researcher, date accessed 8 March 2012.

  • C. Latrigue, J. Glass, N. Alperovich, R. Pieper, P. Parmar, C. Hutchison III, … J. Venter (2007) ‘Genome Transplantation in Bacteria: Changing One Species to Another’, Science, 317,5838, 632–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Mayden (1997) ‘A hierarchy of Species Concepts: The Denouement in the Saga of the Species Problem’ in M. F. Claridge, H. A. Dawah, and M. R. Wilson (eds.) Species: The Units of Biodiversity, (London: Chapman and Hall), 381–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • OTA (Office of Technology Assessment) (1987) ‘New Developments in Biotechnology’ Background paper: Public perceptions of biotechnology. OTA-BP-BA-45. Washington: GPO.

    Google Scholar 

  • PEW (Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology) (2006). Public Sentiment about Genetically Modified Food, http://www.pewtrusts.org/uploadedFiles/wwwpewtrustsorg/News/Press_Releases/Food_and_Biotechnology/PIFB_Public_Sentiment_GM_Foods2005.pdf, date accessed 9 March 2012

  • C. Preston (2008) ‘Synthetic Biology: Drawing a Line in Darwin’s Sand’, Environmental Values, 17,1, 23–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Rifkin (1985) Declaration of a Heretic (Boston and London: Routledge and Kegan Paul).

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Ro, E. Paradise, M. Ouellet, K. Fisher, K. Newman J. Keasling (2006) “Production of the Antimalarial Drug Precursor Artemisinic Acid in Engineered Yeast” Nature, 440, (13 April), 940–943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Robert and F. Bayliss (2003) ‘Crossing Species Boundaries’ American Journal of Bioethics, 3,3, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B.E. Rollin (1995) The Frankenstein syndrome: Ethical and social issues in the genetic engineering of animals (Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • H. Rolston, III. (1971) ‘Hewn and Cleft from this Rock’, Main Currents in Modern Thought, 27,3, 79–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Rolston, III. (1975) ‘Lake Solitude: The Individual in Wildness’, Main Currents in Modern Thought, 31,4, 121–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Rolston, III. (1988) Environmental Ethics: Duties to and Values in the Natural World (Philadelphia: Temple University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Sandler and L. Simon. (2012) ‘The Value of Artefactual Organisms’, Environmental Values, 21, 43–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W. Sanford and V. Shiva (2011) Growing Stories from India: Religion and the Fate of Agriculture (Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Streiffer and T. Hedemann. (2005) ‘The Political Import of Intrinsic Objections to Genetically Engineered Food’, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 18, 191–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Taylor (1986) Respect for nature: A theory of environmental ethics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Thompson (1997) Food Biotechnology in Ethical Perspective (London, U.K.: Blackie Academic & Professional)

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Wade (2010) ‘Researchers Say They Created a Synthetic Cell’ New York Times, May 10, http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/21/science/21cell.html, date accessed 4 February 2012

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Christopher J. Preston

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Preston, C.J. (2014). Evolution and the Deep Past: Intrinsic Responses to Synthetic Biology. In: Sandler, R.L. (eds) Ethics and Emerging Technologies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137349088_36

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics