Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Crossing Species Boundaries

  • Chapter
Ethics and Emerging Technologies

Chapter Summary

In this chapter, Jason Robert and Francoise Baylis critically examine the morality of crossing species boundaries in the context of research that involves combining human and nonhuman animals at the genetic or cellular level. They begin by discussing the notion of species identity, with a focus on the presumed fixity of species boundaries, as well as the general biological and philosophical problem of defining species. Against this backdrop, they survey and criticize earlier efforts to justify a prohibition on crossing species boundaries in the creation of novel beings. They do not attempt to establish the immorality of crossing species boundaries, but do conclude with some thoughts about such crossings, alluding to the notion of moral confusion regarding social and ethical obligations to novel interspecies beings.

This chapter is excerpted from Jason Robert and Francoise Baylis (2003) ‘Crossing Species Boundaries,’ American Journal of Bioethics 3: 1–13. It appears here by permission of Taylor and Francis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Works Cited

  • Advanced Cell Technology (1998) ‘Advanced Cell Technology announces use of nuclear replacement technology for successful generation of human embryonic stem cells,’ Press release, 12 November (available at http://www.advancedcell.com/pr_11-12-1998.html).

  • B. Allen (1997) ‘The chimpanzee’s tool,’ Common Knowledge 6(2): 34–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. J. Annas, L. B. Andrews, and R. M. Isasi (2002) ‘Protecting the endangered human: Toward an international treaty prohibiting cloning and inheritable alterations,’ American Journal of Law & Medicine, 28: 151–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Atran (1999) ‘The universal primacy of generic species in folk biological taxonomy: Implications for human biological, cultural, and scientific evolution,’ in Species: New interdisciplinary essays, (ed.) R. A. Wilson, 231–61 (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Bianco, and P. G. Robey (2001) ‘Stem cells in tissue engineering,’ Nature, 414: 118–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Boyd (1999) ‘Homeostasis, species, and higher taxa,’ in Species: New interdisciplinary essays, (ed.) R. A. Wilson, 141–85. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. Breitowitz (2002) ‘What’s so bad about human cloning?’ Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 12: 325–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Campbell, K. G. Glass, and L. C. Charland (1998) ‘Describing our “humanness”: Can genetic science alter what it means to be “human”?’ Science and Engineering Ethics 4: 413–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. W. S. Chan, K. Y. Chong, C. Martinovich, C. Simerly, and G. Schatten (2001) ‘Transgenic monkeys produced by retroviral gene transfer into mature oocytes,’ Science 291: 309–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. F. Claridge, H. A. Dawah, and M. R. Wilson (eds.) (1997) Species: The units of biodiversity (London: Chapman and Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. M. Claverie (2001) ‘What if there are only 30,000 human genes?’ Science, 291: 1255–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. Dekel, T. Burakova, F. D. Arditti et al. (2003) ‘Human and porcine early kidney precursors as a new source for transplantation,’ Nature Medicine, 9: 53–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. Dennis (2002) ‘China: Stem cells rise in the East,’ Nature, 419: 334–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • N. DeWitt (2002) ‘Biologists divided over proposal to create human-mouse embryos,’ Nature, 420: 255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. Dixon (1984) ‘Engineering chimeras for Noah’s Ark,’ Hastings Center Report, 10: 10–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T. Dobzhansky (1950) ‘Mendelian populations and their evolution,’ American Naturalist, 84: 401–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W. F. Doolittle (1999) ‘Lateral genomics,’ Trends in Genetics, 15(12): M5–M8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Douglas (1966) Purity and danger (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • A. D. Dreger (2000) Hermaphrodites and the medical invention of sex (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Eisenberg (1972) ‘The human nature of human nature,’ Science, 176: 123–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W. Enard, P. Khaitovich, J. Klose, et al. (2002) ‘Intraand interspecific variation in primate gene expression patterns,’ Science, 296: 340–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Ereshefsky (ed.) (1992) The units of evolution: Essays on the nature of species (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. S. Goldstein, M. Drukker, B. E. Reubinoff, and N. Benvenisty (2002) ‘Integration and differentiation of human embryonic stem cells transplanted to the chick embryo,’ Developmental Dynamics. 225: 80–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. R. Grant, and B. R. Grant (2002) ‘Unpredictable evolution in a 30-year study of Darwin’s finches,’ Science, 296: 633–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. E. Griffiths (1999) ‘Squaring the circle: Natural kinds with historical essences,’ in Species: New interdisciplinary essays, (ed.) R. A. Wilson, 209–28 (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • P.E. Griffiths (2002) ‘What is innateness?’ in The Monist 85: 70–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Harris (1998) Clones, genes, and immortality: Ethics and the genetic revolution (New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Harris (2001) ‘Little green primates,’ Current Biology, 11: R78–R79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. L. Hull (1986) ‘On human nature,’ in Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 2: 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. L. Hull (1999) ‘On the plurality of species: Questioning the party line,’ in Species: New interdisciplinary essays, (ed.) R. A. Wilson, 23–48 (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • L. J. Kass (1998) ‘The wisdom of repugnance,’ in The ethics of human cloning, by L. J. Kass and J. Q. Wilson, 3–59 (Washington, DC: AEI Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Kitcher (1984) ‘Species,’ Philosophy of Science, 51: 308–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. M. Krieger (2002) ‘Scientists put a bit of man into a mouse,’ Mercury News, 8 December (available at http://www.bayarea.com/mld/mercurynews/4698610.html).

  • S. Krimsky (1982) Genetic alchemy: The social history of the recombinant DNA controversy (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • R. C. Lewontin (1992) ‘The dream of the human genome,’ New York Review of Books, 28 May, 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. A. Lloyd (1994) ‘Normality and variation: The Human Genome Project and the ideal human type,’ in Are genes us? The social consequences of the new genetics, (ed.) C. F. Cranor, 99–112 (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. D. Loike, and M. D. Tendler (2002) ‘Revisiting the definition of Homo sapiens,’ Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 12: 343–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. C. Love (2003) ‘Evolutionary morphology, innovation, and the synthesis of evolutionary and developmental biology,’ Biology & Philosophy, 18: 309–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. O. Lovejoy (1970) The great chain of being: A Study of the history of an idea (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Marks (2002) What it means to be 98% chimpanzee: Apes, human beings, and their genes (Berkeley: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Marshall (1998) ‘Claim of human-cow embryo greeted with skepticism,’ Science, 282: 1390–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. L. Mayden (1997) ‘A hierarchy of species concepts: The denouement in the saga of the species problem,’ in Species: The units of biodiversity, (ed.) M. F. Claridge, H. A. Dawah, and M. R. Wilson, 381–424 (London: Chapman and Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Mayr (1940) ‘Speciation phenomena in birds,’ American Naturalist, 74: 249–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Mayr (1959) ‘Typological versus populational thinking,’ in Evolution and the Diversity of Life, E. Mayr, 26–29 (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • D. J. Mooney, and A. G. Mikos (1999) ‘Growing new organs,’ Scientific American, 280: 38–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Morriss (1997) ‘Blurred boundaries,’ Inquiry 40: 259–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. V. Olson, and A. Varki (2003) ‘Sequencing the chimpanzee genome: Insights into human evolution and disease,’ Nature Reviews Genetics, 4: 20–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • V. Ourednik, J. Ourednik, J. D. Flax, et al. (2001) ‘Segregation of human neural stem cells in the developing primate forebrain,’ Science 293: 1820–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Oyama (2000) The ontogeny of information: Developmental systems and evolution (Durham: Duke University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • R. Plomin, J. C. Defries, I. W. Craig, P. McGufan, and J. Kagan, (eds.) (2002) Behavioral genetics in the postgenomic era. (Washington: American Psychological Association).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. S. Robert (1998) ‘Illich, education, and the Human Genome Project: Reflections on paradoxical counterproductivity,’ Bulletin of Science, Technology, and Society, 18: 228–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. G. Simpson (1961) Principles of animal taxonomy (New York: Columbia University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Sober (1980) ‘Evolution, population thinking, and essentialism,’ Philosophy of Science, 47: 350–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Stout (2001) Ethics after Babel: The languages of morals and their discontents (Boston: Beacon Books) Reprint, in expanded form and with a new postscript, (1988) (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • A. I. Tauber, and S. Sarkar (1992) ‘The Human Genome Project: Has blind reductionism gone too far?’ Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 35: 220–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. Thomas (1983) Man and the natural world: Changing attitudes in England, 1500–1800 (London: Allen Lane).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Trigg (1988) Ideas of human nature: An historical introduction (Oxford, U.K.: Basil Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Wade (1998) ‘Researchers claim embryonic cell mix of human and cow,’ New York Times, 12 November, A1. (available at http://query.nytimes.com/search/article-page.html?res~9C04E3D71731F931A25752C1A96E958260.

  • N. Wade (2002) ‘Scientist reveals genome secret: It’s his,’ New York Times, 27 April. (available at http://www.nytimes.com/2002/04/27/science/27GENO.html).

  • I. Weissman (2002) ‘Stem cells: Scientific, medical, and political issues,’ New England Journal of Medicine, 346: 1576–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. O. Wiley (1978) ‘The evolutionary species concept reconsidered,’ Systematic Zoology 27: 17–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. B. Williams (1992) ‘Species: Current usages,’ in Keywords in evolutionary biology, (ed.) E. F. Keller and E. A. Lloyd, 318–23 (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. A. Wilson (1999a) ‘Realism, essence, and kind: Resuscitating species essentialism?’ in Species: New interdisciplinary essays, (ed.) R. A. Wilson, 187–207 (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. A. Wilson (1999b) Species: New interdisciplinary essays (Cambridge: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • C. S. Young, S. Terada, J. P. Vacanti, et al. (2002) ‘Tissue engineering of complex tooth structures on biodegradable polymer scaffolds,’ Journal of Dental Research 81: 695–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Jason Robert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Françoise Baylis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Northeastern University, Boston, USA

    Ronald L. Sandler

Copyright information

© 2014 Jason Robert and Françoise Baylis

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Robert, J., Baylis, F. (2014). Crossing Species Boundaries. In: Sandler, R.L. (eds) Ethics and Emerging Technologies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137349088_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation