Skip to main content

Re-thinking Rural Conflict, Cooperation Difficulties, and Failure: The Case of Rural Cooperatives

  • Chapter
Rural Cooperation in Europe

Abstract

Cooperatives offer many advantages as a model for development of specialist agri-food businesses in rural areas. They allow groups of people to work together and build expertise, and are large enough to compete with private and multinational businesses. Here we report research that was carried out in Wales, UK, and which sought to identify the characteristics of rural, agri-food cooperatives. The empirical research highlighted significant rural conflicts, cooperation difficulties and failure which we document and theorise next. The research isolated select few issues that impede rural cooperation and highlighted factors that need to be in place for a rural, agri-food cooperative to be sustainable and successful and for cooperation to flourish. Rural cooperation problems and difficulties that were identified included weak loyalty, distrust, opportunistic and ‘devious’ behaviours on the part of members and other stakeholders. Lack of professional management, inadequate marketing and branding expertise were also distinguished as key determinants of the high failure rate of start-up cooperatives in Wales. Cooperatives which did not involve trading operations, such as knowledge transfer organisations, business clubs and show societies, appeared more sustainable and resilient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aznar-Sanchez, J., Galdeano-Gomez, E. and Perez-Mesa, J. (2011) ‘Intensive Horticulture in Almeria (Spain): A Counterpoint to Current European Rural Policy Strategies’, journal of Agrarian Change 11: 241–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, T. (2001) ‘With and Without Co-operation: Two Alternative Strategies in the Food-Processing Industry in the Italian South’. Entrepreneur ship & Regional Development 13: 117–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boonstra, W. and Frouws, J. (2005) ‘Conflicts about Water: A Case Study of Contest and Power in Dutch Rural Policy’. Journal of Rural Studies 21: 297–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derkzen, P., Franklin, A. and Bock, B. (2008) ‘Examining Power Struggles as a Signifier of Successful Partnership Working: A Case Study of Partnership Dynamics’. Journal of Rural Studies 24: 458–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Falco, S., Smale, M. and Penings, C. (2008) ‘The Role of Agricultural Cooperatives in Sustaining the Wheat Diversity and Productivity: The Case of Southern Italy’. Environment and Resource Economics 39:161–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franks, J. and McGloin, A. (2007) ‘Environmental Co-Operatives as Instruments for Delivering Across-Farm Environmental and Rural Policy Objectives: Lessons for the UK’. Journal of Rural Studies 23: 472–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grancelli, B. (2011) ‘Local Development in the Rural Regions of Eastern Europe: Post-Socialist Paradoxes of Economic and Social Entrepreneurs hip’, http:// econpapers.repec.org/article/raijoeems/doi_5fl0.1688_2fl862-0019_5fjeems_ 5f2011_5f01_5fgrancelli.htm (accessed 3 March 2013).

  • Jepson, W. (2006) ‘Producing a Modern Agricultural Frontier: Firms and Cooperatives in Eastern Mato Grosso, Brazil’. Economic Geography 82: 289–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyriakopoulos, K., Meulenberg, M. and Nilsson, J. (2004) ‘The Impact of Cooperative Structure and Firm Culture on Market Orientation and Performance’. Agribusiness 20: 379–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamprinopoulou, , Tregear, A. and Ness, M. (2006) ‘Agrifood SMEs in Greece: The Role of Collective Action’. British Food journal 108: 663–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorendahl, B. (1996) ‘New Cooperatives and Local Development: A Study of Six Cases in Jamtland, Sweden’, journal of Rural Studies 12: 143–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, A. (2004) ‘The Rise of Social Cooperatives in Italy’. Voluntas 15: 243–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzun, V. (2005) ‘Large and Small Business in Russian Agriculture: Adaptation to Market’. Comparative Economic Studies 47: 85–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valentinov, V. (2007) ‘Why Are Cooperatives Important in Agriculture? An Organizational Economics Perspective’, journal of Institutional Economics 3: 55–69].

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Alex Warlow and Edward Kasabov

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Warlow, A., Kasabov, E. (2014). Re-thinking Rural Conflict, Cooperation Difficulties, and Failure: The Case of Rural Cooperatives. In: Kasabov, E. (eds) Rural Cooperation in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137348890_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics