Heterosexuality is both pervasive and normative in the current sociocultural milieu. Due to its privileged societal status, heterosexuality is also (ironically) quite elusive. Within the social science literature, heterosexuality is generally defined as a sexual or relational identity (belonging to individuals or groups) and also as a social institution (which structures daily life). Historically, heterosexuality has largely been ignored in psychological theory and research as a topic of, or for, analysis. Psychological theory has assumed that heterosexuality is a ‘given’ and ‘normal’, and focused its research on sexualities that sit outside this supposed norm (e.g. homosexuality, lesbianism). Such research has functioned to further normalise heterosexuality, while pathologising other ways of being sexual, without taking into account the historical conditions that have produced heterosexuality as the ‘norm’. Psychological research on heterosexual men and women has typically been carried out in a completely taken-for-granted manner, with heterosexuality being overlooked as a category of analysis and as a factor contributing to individual psychologies and behaviours.


Sexual Orientation Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia Heterosexual Woman Relational Identity Sexual Script 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Further reading

  1. Barker, M. & Langdridge, D. (Eds.) (2010). Understanding non-monogamies.New York: London, Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Ingraham, C. (2008). White weddings: Romancing heterosexuality in popular culture(2nd ed.). New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  3. Jackson, S. (1999). Heterosexuality in question.London: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Richardson, D. (Ed.) (1996). Theorising heterosexuality.Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Wilkinson, S. & Kitzinger, C. (Eds.) (1993). Heterosexuality: A feminism & psychology reader.London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar


  1. Allen, L. S. & Gorski, R. A. (1992). Sexual orientation and the size of the anterior commissure in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 89(15), 7199–7202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barker, M. (2007). Heteronormativity and the exclusion of bisexuality in psychology. In V. Clarke & E. Peel (Eds.) Out in psychology: Lesbian, gay bisexual, trans, and queer perspectives, (pp. 86–118). Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. Bailey, J. M., Dunne, M. P., & Martin, N. G. (2000). Genetic and environmental influences on sexual orientation and its correlates in an Australian twin sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.78(3), 524–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bao, A. M. & Swaab, D. R (2011). Sexual differentiation of the human brain: relation to gender identity, sexual orientation and neuropsychiatrie disorders. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 32(2), 214–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bern, D.J. (1996). Exotic becomes erotic: A developmental theory of sexual orientation. Psychological Review, 103(2), 320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beres, M. A. & Rarvid, P. (2010). Sexual ethics and young women’s accounts of heterosexual casual sex. Sexualities, 13(3), 377–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bernstein, M. (2002). Identities and politics: Toward a historical understanding of the lesbian and gay movement. Social Science History, 26(3), 531–581.Google Scholar
  8. Bogaert, A. R & Blanchard, R. (1996). Physical development and sexual orientation in men: Height, weight and age of puberty differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 21(1), 77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bogaert, A. F. & Friesen, C. (2002). Sexual orientation and height, weight, and age of puberty: New tests from a British national probability sample. Biological Psychology, 59(2), 135–145. doi:–0511(01)00131-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bohan, J. (1996). Psychology and sexual orientation: Coming to terms.New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Braun, V. (2000). Heterosexism in focus group research: Collusion and challenge. Feminism & Psychology, 10(1), 133–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity.New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Byne, W., Tobet, S., Mattiace, L. A., Lasco, M. S., Kemether, E., Edgar, M. A., Morgello, S., Buchsbaum, M. S., & Jones, L. B. (2001). The interstitial nuclei of the human anterior hypothalamus: An investigation of variation with sex, sexual orientation, and HIV status. Hormones and behavior, 40(2), 86–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Byrne, D. (1977). Social psychology and the study of sexual behavior. Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cameron, D. & Kulick, D. (2003). Language and sexuality.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clarke, V., Ellis, S. J., Peel, E., & Riggs, D. W. (2010). Lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans and queer psych ol ogy: A n in trodu c ti on. Retri e v e d f r omGoogle Scholar
  17. Coates, J. (2013). The discursive production of everyday heterosexualities. Discourse& Society, 24(5), 536–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. de Beauvoir, S. (1953 [1949]). The second sex(trans. H. M. Parshley). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  19. Dean, J. J. (2011). The cultural construction of heterosexual identities. Sociology Compass, 5(8), 679–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dominguez-Salazai, E., Portillo, W., Baum, M. J., Bakker, J., & Paiedes, R. G. (2002). Effect of prenatal androgen receptor antagonist or aromatase inhibitor on sexual behavior, partner preference and neuronal Fos responses to estrous female odors in the rat accessor)’’ olfactory system. Physiology & behavior, 75(3), 337–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ellis, L. & Ames, M. A. (1987). Neurohormonal functioning and sexual orientation: A theory of homosexuality-heterosexuality. Psychological Bulletin, 101(2), 233.Google Scholar
  22. Eyre, L. (1993). Compulsory heterosexuality in a university classroom. Canadian Journal of Education/Revue canadienne de l’éducation, 18(3), 273–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Farvid, P. & Braun, V. (2006). ‘Most of us guys are raring to go anytime, anyplace, anywhere’: Male and female sexuality in Cleo and Cosmo. Sex Roles, 55(5-6), 295–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Farvid, P. & Braun, V. (2013). Casual sex as ‘not a natural act’ and other regimes of truth about heterosexuality. Feminism & Psychology, 23(3), 359–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Farvid, P. & Braun, V. (2014). The’ sassy woman’ and the ‘performing man’: Heterosexual casual sex advice and the (re)constitution of gendered subjectivities. Feminist Media Studies, 14(1), 118–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fausto-Sterling, A. (2000). Sexing the body.New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  27. Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality 1: The will to knowledge.London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  28. Freud, S. (2000 [1905]). Three essays on the theory of sexuality(trans. J. Strachey). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  29. Freud, S. (1959 [1922]). Group psychology and the analysis of the ego(trans. J. Strachey). London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  30. Friedan, B. (1963). The feminine mystique.Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
  31. Gagnon, J. H. & Simon, W. (1973). Sexual conduct: The social sources of human sexuality.Chicago: Aldine Books.Google Scholar
  32. Gavey, N. (2005). Just sex?: The cultural scaffolding of rape.London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Gill, R. (2008). Empowerment/sexism: Figuring female sexual agency in contemporary advertising. Feminism Sc Psychology, 18(1), 35–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gill, R. (2009). Mediated intimacy and postfeminism: A discourse analytic examination of sex and relationships advice in a women’s magazine. Discourse& Communication, 3(4), 345–369.Google Scholar
  35. Gough, B. & Edwards, G. (1998). The beer talking: four lads, a carry out and the reproduction of masculinities. The Sociological Review, 46(3), 409–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hamer, D. H., Hu, S., Magnuson, V. L., Hu, N., & Pattatucci, A. M. (1993). A linkage between DNA markers on the X chromosome and male sexual orientation. Science, 261(5119), 321–327.Google Scholar
  37. Heath, Melanie. (2009). State of our unions: Marriage promotion and the contested power of heterosexuality. Gender& Society, 23(1), 27–48.Google Scholar
  38. Hegarty, P. (1997). Materializing the hypothalamus: A performative account of the ‘gay brain’. Feminism & Psychology, 7(3), 355–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hegarty, P. (2002). ‘It’s not a choice, it’s the way we’re built’: Symbolic beliefs about sexual orientation in the US and Britain. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 12, 153–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Herek, G. M. (Ed.) (1998). Stigma and sexual orientation: Understanding prejudice against lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals.Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  41. Hickey, M., Doherty, D. A., Hart, R., Norman, R. J., Mattes, E., Atkinson, H. C., & Sloboda, D. M. (2010). Maternal and umbilical cord androgen concentrations do not predict digit ratio (2D:4D) in girls: A prospective cohort study. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 35(8), 1235–1244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hines, M., Brook, C., & Conway, G. S. (2004). Androgen and psychosexual development: Core gender identity, sexual orientation, and recalled childhood gender role behavior in women and men with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH). atThe journal of Sex Research, 41(1), 75–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hubbard, P. (2008). Here, there, everywhere: The ubiquitous geographies of heteronormativity. Geography Compass, 2(3), 640–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ingraham, C. (1996). The heterosexual imaginary. In S. Seidman (Ed.) Queer theory/sociology, (pp. 168–193). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  45. Ingraham, C. (Ed.) (2005). Thinking straight: The power, the promise, and the paradox of heterosexuality.New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Ingraham, C. (2008). White weddings: Romancing heterosexuality in popular culture(2nd ed.). New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  47. Jackson, S. (1995a). Gender and heterosexuality: A materialist feminist analysis. In M. Maynard & J. Purvis (Eds.) (Hetero)Sexual Politics, (pp. 11–26). London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  48. Jackson, S. (1995b). Heterosexuality, power and pleasure. Feminism& Psychology, 5(1), 131–135.Google Scholar
  49. Jackson, S. (1996). Heterosexuality as a problem for feminist theory. In L. Adkins & V. Merchant (Eds.) Sexualising the social: Power and the organisation of sexuality, (pp. 15–34). London: Macmillan Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Jackson, S. (1999). Heterosexuality in question.London: Sage.Google Scholar
  51. Jackson, S. (2006). Interchanges: Gender, sexuality and heterosexuality: The complexity (and limits) of heteronormativity. Feminist Theory, 7(1), 105–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Jackson, S. (2011). Heterosexual hierarchies: A commentary on class and sexuality. Sexualities, 14(1), 12–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Katz, J. (2007). The invention of heterosexuality(2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  54. King, N. (1988). Teaching about lesbians and gays in the psychology cumculum. In B. Bronstein & K. Quina (Eds.) Teaching a psychology of the people: Resources for gender and sociocultural awareness, (pp. 168–174). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kinsey, A. O, Pomeroy W. B., & Martin, C. E. (1948). Sexual behavior in the human male.Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Co.Google Scholar
  56. Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., Martin, C. E., & Gebhard, P. H. (1953). Sexual behavior in the human female.Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Co.Google Scholar
  57. Krafft-Ebing, Richard von. (1886). Psychopathia sexualis:A medico-forensic study.New York: GP Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar
  58. Kitzinger, C. (1994). Experiential authority and heterosexuality. In G. Griffin (Ed.) Changing our lives: Doing women’s studies, (pp. 135–144). London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  59. Kitzinger, C. (2005). Heteronormativity in action: Reproducing the heterosexual nuclear family in after-hours medical calls. Social Problems, 52(4), 477–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kitzinger, C. & Perkins, R. (1993). Changing our minds: Lesbian feminism and psychology.London: Onlywomen Press.Google Scholar
  61. Kitzinger, C. & Wilkinson, S. (1993). Theorizing heterosexuality. In S. Wilkinson & C. Kitzinger (Eds.) Heterosexuality: A ‘feminism and psychology’ reader, (pp. 1–32). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  62. Kitzinger, C., Wilkinson, S., & Perkins, R. (1992). Heterosexual feminist identities: The personal and the political. Feminism & Psychology, 2(3), 419.Google Scholar
  63. Kolehmainen, M. (2012). Tracing ambivalent norms of sexuality: Agony columns, audience responses and parody. Sexualities, 25(8), 978–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. LeVay, S. (1991). A difference in hypothalamic structure between heterosexual and homosexual men. Science, 253(5023), 1034–1037.Google Scholar
  65. Martin, J., Puts, D., & Breedlove, S. M. (2008). Hand asymmetry in heterosexual and homosexual men and women: Relationship to 2D:4D digit ratios and other sexually dimorphic anatomical traits. Archives of Sexual behavior, 37(1), 119–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Martin, K. A. (2009). Normalizing heterosexuality: Mothers’ assumptions, talk, and strategies with young children. American Sociological Review, 74(2), 190–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Millett, K. (1970). Sexual politics.New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  68. Morgan, E. M. (2012). Not always a straight path: College students’ narratives of heterosexual identity development. Sex Roles, 66(1-2), 79–93.Google Scholar
  69. Oakley, A. (1972). Sex, gender and society.London: Maurice Temple Smith.Google Scholar
  70. Phillips, S. R. (1991). The hegemony of heterosexuality: A study of introductory texts. Teaching Sociology, 19(4), 454–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Pillard, R. C. & Bailey, J. M. (1998). Human sexual orientation has a heritable component. Human Biology, 70(2), 347–365.Google Scholar
  72. Rich, A. (1980). Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. Signs, 5(4), 631–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Richardson, D. (Ed.) (1996). Theorising heterosexuality.Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Richardson, D. (2004). Locating sexualities: From here to normality. Sexualities, 7, 391–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Rieger, G. & Savin-Williams, R. (2012). Gender nonconformity, sexual orientation, and psychological well-being. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(3), 611–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Rossi, L. M. (2011). ‘Happy’ and ‘unhappy’ performatives: Images and norms of heterosexuality. Australian Feminist Studies, 26(67), 9–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Roselli, C. E. & Stormshak, F. (2009). The neurobiology of sexual partner preferences in rams. Hormones and behavior, 55(5), 611–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Rubin, G. (1975). The traffic in women. In R. R. Reiter (Ed.) Toward an anthropology of women.New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  79. Schilt, K. & Westbrook, L. (2009). Doing gender, doing heteronormativity: ‘Gender normals,’ transgender people, and the social maintenance of heterosexuality. Gender& Society, 23(4), 440–464.Google Scholar
  80. Seidman, S. (1996). Queer theory/sociology.Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  81. Seidman, S. (2005). From polluted homosexual to the normal gay: Changing patterns of sexual regulation in America. In C. Ingraham (Ed.) Thinking straight: New work in critical heterosexuality studies, (pp. 39–62). New York: RoutledGoogle Scholar
  82. Seidman, S. (2009). Critique of compulsory heterosexuality. Sexuality Research& Social Policy, 6(1), 18–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Seidman, S. (2010). The social construction of sexuality(2nd ed.). New York: W. W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
  84. Small, M. (1975). Lesbians and the class position of women. In N. Myron & C. Bunch (Eds.) Lesbianism and the women’s movement, (pp. 49–62). Baltimore: Diana Press.Google Scholar
  85. Stockman, E. R., Callaghan, R. S., & Baum, M.J. (1985). Effects of neonatal castration and testosterone treatment on sexual partner preference in the ferret. Physiology & behavior, 34(3), 409–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Storms, M. D. (1980). Theories of sexual orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(5), 783–792.Google Scholar
  87. Swaab, D. R, Zhou, J. N., Fodor, M., & Hofman, M. A. (1997). Sexual differentiation of the human brain. Biomedical Reviews, 7, 17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Swaab, D. F. (2007). Sexual differentiation of the brain and behavior. Best Practice& Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 21(3), 431–444.Google Scholar
  89. Tiefer, L. (2004). Sex is not a natural act and other essays(2nd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  90. Tolman, D. L., Striepe, M. I., & Harmon, T. (2003). Gender matters: Constructing a model of adolescent sexual health. The Journal of Sex Research, 40(1), 4–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. van Hoof, J. (7 April 2014). Doing it with the lights on: An exploration of the sexual lives of married and cohabiting heterosexual women.Presented at the Gender, Equality and Intimacy: (Un)comfortable bedfellows? workshop, London.Google Scholar
  92. Warner, M. (1991). Introduction: Fear of a queer planet. Social Text, 29, 3–17.Google Scholar
  93. Weeks, J. (1996). The construction of homosexuality. In S. Seidman (Ed.) Queer theory/sociology, (pp. 41–63). Maiden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  94. Wilkinson, S. & Kitzinger, C. (Eds.) (1993). Heterosexuality: A feminism & psychology reader.London: Sage.Google Scholar
  95. Wittig, M. (1992). The straight mind and other essays. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  96. Wittig, M. (1993). One is not born a woman. In H. Abelove, M. A. Barale, & D. M. Halperin (Eds.) The lesbian and gay studies reader, (pp. 103–109). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  97. Worthington, R. L., Savoy, H. B., Dillon, F. R., & Vernaglia, E. R. (2002). Heterosexual identity development: A multidimensional model of individual and social identity. The Counseling Psychologist, 30(A), 496–531.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Panteá Farvid 2015

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations