Advertisement

Introduction: Conceptualizing ‘the Known’ and the Relational Dynamics of Power and Resistance

  • Damian J. Rivers

Abstract

This volume stands as an intended expression of responsible pedagogy; however, as no such recognized category exists — on the odd assumption that all of our pedagogies are responsible — it will most likely be banished to the distant domain of critical pedagogy, host to the voices of ‘them’ and ‘their’ views as opposed to ‘us’ and ‘our’ views. With this unwanted categorization in mind, a few words on the nature of the critique seem like as good a place as any from which to begin. Foucault (1981/1988: 154) contends that the critique is not just a ‘matter of saying that things are not right as they are. It is a matter of pointing out on what kinds of assumptions, what kinds of familiar, unchallenged, unconsidered modes of thought the practices that we accept rest.’ While this appears to be a fundamental requirement of any prospective responsible pedagogy, like so many facets within the relational dynamic of resistance-power/power-resistance, the nature of the critique offers numerous pitfalls and paradoxes. Indeed, Foucault (1978/1997: 42) earlier warns that the critique ‘only exists in relation to something other than itself: it is an instrument, a means for a future or a truth that it will not know nor happen to be’. In terms of this volume, such a perspective on the nature of the critique complements the Krishnamurtian approach to ‘the unknown’ in that it can never be more than a mere gesture toward an unreachable final destination or point of resolution.

Keywords

Language Education Language Teacher Happy Ending Intended Expression Moral Accountability 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arendt, H. (1970). On violence. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
  2. Berkowitz, P. (2007). The liberal spirit in America and its paradoxes. In N. Jumonville and K. Mattson (eds), Liberalism for a new century (pp. 13–32). Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bloom, A. (1987). The closing of the American mind (25th anniversary edn). New York: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks.Google Scholar
  4. Boler, M. (1999). Feeling power: Emotions and education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Bourdieu, P. (1987). Choses dites. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, P. and Passeron, J.-C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture (2nd edn). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Carroll, S., Motha, S. and Price, J. N. (2008). Accessing imagined communities and reinscribing regimes of truth. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 5(3): 3–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cochran-Smith, M. (1991). Learning to teach against the grain. Harvard Educational Review, 61: 279–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dale, J. and Hyslop-Margison, E. J. (2012). Paulo Freire: Teaching for freedom and transformation. London: Springer.Google Scholar
  10. Dewey, J. (1916/2004). Democracy and education. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  11. Fleming, P. and Spicer, A. (2007). Contesting the corporation: Struggle, power and resistance in organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Foucault, M. (1978/1997). What is critique? In S. Lotringer (ed.), The politics of truth (pp. 41–81). Los Angeles, Calif.: Seimotext(e).Google Scholar
  13. Foucault, M. (1978/2007). The notion of conduct (1 March 1978). In M. Senellart (ed.), Security, territory, population: Lectures at the Collège de France 1977–78 (pp. 256–83). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  14. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  15. Foucault, M. (1981/1988). Practicing criticism. In L. D. Kritzman (ed.), Foucault: Politics, philosophy, culture (pp. 152–8). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Foucault, M. (1990). History of sexuality. Vol. 1: An introduction. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  17. Giroux, H. A. (1991). Border pedagogy and the politics of postmodernism. Social Text, 28: 51–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Giroux, H. A. (2001). Theory and resistance in education: Towards a pedagogy for the opposition. Westport, Conn.: Bergin & Garvey.Google Scholar
  19. Holloway, J. (2002a). Change the world without taking power: The meaning of revolution today. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  20. Holloway, J. (2002b). In the beginning was the scream. In W. Bonefeld (ed.), Revolutionary writing: Common sense essays in post-political politics (pp. 15–22). New York: Autonomedia.Google Scholar
  21. Huxley, A. (1954/1975). Foreword. In J. Krishnamurti, The first and last freedom. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  22. Krishnamurti, J. (1953/1981). Education and the significance of life. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  23. Krishnamurti, J. (1954/1975). The first and last freedom. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  24. Krishnamurti, J. (1956/1967). Commentaries on living. Wheaton, Ill.: The Theosophical Publishing House.Google Scholar
  25. Krishnamurti, J. (1969). Freedom from the known. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  26. Lake, D. A. (2011). Why ‘isms’ are evil: Theory, epistemology, and academic sects as impediments to understanding and progress. International Studies Quarterly, 55(2): 3–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lather, P. (1998). Critical pedagogy and its complicities: A praxis of stuck places. Educational Theory, 48(4): 3–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lutyens, M. (1997). Krishnamurti: The years of awakening. Boston, Mass.: Shambhala Publications.Google Scholar
  29. McChesney, R. W. (1999). Introduction. In N. Chomsky (ed.), Profit over people: Neoliberalism and global order (pp. 7–16). New York: Seven Stories Press.Google Scholar
  30. McLaren, P. (1994). Multiculturalism and the postmodern critique: Towards a pedagogy of resistance and transformation. In H. A. Giroux and P. McLaren (eds), Between borders: Pedagogy and the politics of cultural studies (pp. 192–224). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Matt, B. F. and Shahinpoor, N. (2011). Speaking truth to power: The courageous organizational dissenter. In D. R. Comer and G. Vega (eds), Moral courage in organizations: Doing the right thing at work (pp. 157–70). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  32. Mills, C. (2000). Efficacy and vulnerability: Judith Butler on reiteration and resistance. Australian Feminist Studies, 15(32): 3–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Moss, D. M. and Osborn, T. A. (2010). Introduction: Considering resistance. In D. M. Moss and T. A. Osborn (eds), Critical essays on resistance in education (pp. 1–7). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  34. Ng, R. (2003). Toward an integrative approach to equity in education. In P. P. Trifonas (ed.), Pedagogies of difference: Rethinking education for social change (pp. 206–19). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Ostrowski, D. (2002). The façade of legitimacy: Exchange of power and authority in early modern Russia. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 44(3): 3–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rivers, D. J. (2013). Institutionalized native-speakerism: Voices of dissent and acts of resistance. In S. A. Houghton and D. J. Rivers (eds), Native-speakerism in Japan: Intergroup dynamics in foreign language education (pp. 75–91). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  37. Schutz, A. (2004). Rethinking domination and resistance: Challenging postmodernism. Educational Researcher, 33(1): 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shor, I. (1992). Empowering education: Critical teaching for social change. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  39. Simon, R. I. (1992). Teaching against the grain: Texts for pedagogy of possibility. Toronto: OISE Press.Google Scholar
  40. Spivak, G. (1990). The making of Americans, the teaching of English, and the future of culture studies. New Literary History, 21(4): 3–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Žižek, S. (1989). The sublime object of ideology. New York: Verso.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Damian J. Rivers 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Damian J. Rivers

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations