Abstract
The human body is a material site of meaning, of lived experience that also exists within sociocultural and symbolic frames of reference that encode the body from the outside. Technoscience is one such external frame, modifying our understanding of the body throughout the ages. The invention of the stethoscope and discovery of x-rays in the nineteenth century, for instance, transformed the seemingly solid body into something penetrable. This view of a penetrable, pliable body developed with the advent of eugenics in the early twentieth century, encouraging the view that the body can be molded and improved on. In the second half of the twentieth century and at the start of this twenty-first century, we have witnessed huge advances in medical science that have further changed our perceptions of the body. Landmark breakthroughs in genetic medicine and nanotechnology have rendered the body always theoretically alterable by science, prompting discussions in cultural theory of the “body without organs” (Deleuze and Guattari 4).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Works Cited
Baudrillard, Jean. Simulacra and Simulations. Trans. Shiela Fraser. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 1994. Print.
Best, S., and D. Kellner. The Postmodern Adventure: Science, Technology, and Cultural Studies at the Third Millennium. New York: Guilford Press, 2001. Print.
Caidin, Martin. Cyborg. New York: Warner, 1972. Print.
Clapton, Jayne, and Jennifer Fitzgerald. “The History of Disability: A History of ’Other-ness.” New Renaissance Magazine 7.1 (1997). Web. 3 Jan. 2012.
Darke, Paul. “Understanding Cinematic Representations of Disability.” The Disability Reader. Ed. Tom Shakespeare. London: Continuum, 1998. 181–200. Print.
Deleuze, Gilles, and Felix Guattari. A Thousand Plateaus. Trans. Brian Massumi. London: Anthlone Press, 1988. Print.
Dvorsky, George, and James Hughes. “Postgenderism: Beyond the Gender Binary.” Institute for Emerging Ethics and Technologies, 20 Mar. 2008. Web. 1 Mar. 2010.
Featherstone, Mike. “The Body in Consumer Culture.” The Body: Social Process and Cultural Theory. Ed. Mike Featherstone, Mike Hepworth, and Bryan S. Turner. London: SAGE Publications, 1991. 170–96. Print.
Ghai, Anita. “Disability in the Indian Context: Post-Colonial Perspectives.” Disability/ Postmodernity: Embodying Disability Theory. Ed. Mairian Corker and Tom Shakespeare. London: Continuum, 2002. 88–100. Print.
Gibson, William. Neuromancer. 1984. New York: HarperCollins, 2011. Print.
Haiken, Elizabeth. “The Making of the Modern Face: Cosmetic Surgery.” Social Research 68.1 (2000): 81–97. Web. 3 Apr. 2011.
Hogle, Linda. “Enhancement Technologies and the Body.” Annual Review of Anthropology 34 (2005): 695–716. Web. 27 Aug. 2010.
Jayaram, N. “Caste, Corporate Disabilities and Compensatory Discrimination in India: Colonial Legacy and Post-Colonial Paradox.” Colonialism and Welfare: Social Policy and the British Imperial Legacy. Ed. James Midgley and David Piachaud. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2011. 85–99. Print.
Kessler, Henry H. The Principles and Practices of Rehabilitation. New York: Arno Press, 1980. Print.
Longmore, Paul. “Screening Stereotypes: Images of Disabled People.” Screening Disability: Essays on Cinema and Disability. Ed. Anthony Enns and Christopher Smith. Lanham: UP of America, 2001. 1–18. Print.
McCaffrey, Anne. The Ship Who Sang. 1961. London: Corgi Books, 1999. Print.
McDonald, Ian. River of Gods. London: Gollancz, 2009. Print.
Neumann, Boaz. “Being Prosthetic in the First World War and Weimar Germany.” Body & Society 16.93 (2010): 93–126. Web. 17 Sep. 2010.
Norden, Martin. The Cinema of Isolation: A History of Physical Disability in the Movies. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers UP, 1994. Print.
Odle, E. V. The Clockwork Man. London: W. Heinemann, 1923. Print.
Reddy, Gayatri. With Respect to Sex: Negotiating Hijra Identity in South India. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2005. Print.
Rose, Nikolas. “Neurochemical Selves.” Society 41.1 (Nov./Dec. 2003): 46–59. Web. 2 Jan. 2011.
—. “The Politics of Life Itself” Theory, Culture & Society 18.6 (Dec. 2001): 1–30. Web. 10 Jun. 2011.
Singh, Ekta. Caste System in India: A Historical Perspective. New Dehli, India: Kalpaz Publications, 2009. Print.
Sterling, Bruce. Schismatrix. New York: Arbor House, 1985. Print.
Suvin, Darko. Metamorphoses of Science Fiction: On the Poetics and History of a Literary Genre. New Haven, CT: Yale UP, 1979. Print.
van der Ploeg, Irma. Prosthetic Bodies: The Construction of the Fetus and the Couple as Patients in Reproductive Technologies. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001. Print.
Watts, Peter. Blindsight. New York: Tor Books, 2006. Web. 8 Apr. 2012.
Wills, David. Prosthesis. Stanford, CA: Stanford UP, 1995. Print.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2013 Kathryn Allan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mattar, N. (2013). Prosthetic Bodies. In: Allan, K. (eds) Disability in Science Fiction. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137343437_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137343437_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-46568-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-34343-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)