Skip to main content

Stereotypes in Christian Theology: Methodological and Eschatological Aspects

  • Chapter
Religious Stereotyping and Interreligious Relations
  • 200 Accesses

Abstract

In this article, I approach the issue of stereotyping on two levels. First, methodologically, by revisiting the somewhat classical discussion on the sources of theology, discussing methods of correlation in the theologies of Paul Tillich and David Tracy, and arguing that acknowledging other religious traditions as sources of Christian theology can actually work as an antidote to theological stereotypes. Second, eschatologically, by highlighting one area of Christian theology where theologians, generally considered well informed by, and open to, religious pluralism, tend to a sort of othering or stereotyping of the religious Other. Then, in an attempt to combine these two levels, I apply the methodological argument of the first level to the second level’s question of the religious Other in Christian eschatology. Concretely, this means that I briefly “correlate” some aspects of religious otherness in the eschatologies of the Christian theologian Wolfhart Pannenberg and the Muslim theologian Ahmad Sakr.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Paul Tillich, Systematic Theology I: Reason and Revelation. Being and God (Chicago: SCM, 1978), 60.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Paul Tillich, “The Problem of Theological Method: II,” Journal of Religion 27:1 (1947), 26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. For a more detailed account of Tillich’s theological circle, see Michael W. DeLashmutt, “Syncretism or Correlation: Teilhard and Tillich’s Contrasting Methodological Approaches to Science and Theology,” Zygon 40:3 (2005), 739–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. David Tracy, Blessed Rage for Order: The New Pluralism in Theology (with a New Preface) (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2nd ed. 1996), 44.

    Google Scholar 

  5. David Tracy, The Analogical Imagination: Christian Theology and the Culture of Pluralism (London: SCM, 1981), 217f.

    Google Scholar 

  6. For the concept of “limit,” see Tracy, Blessed Rage for Order, 92–118. For the concept of “classic,” see Tracy, The Analogical Imagination, 99–153. For the concept of “fragment,” see David Tracy, “Form and Fragment: The Recovery of the Hidden and Incomprehensible God,” The Concept of God in Global Dialogue (ed. Werner G. Jeanrond and Aasulv Lande; New York: Orbis, 2005), 98–114.

    Google Scholar 

  7. David Tracy, “Hermeneutical Reflections in the New Paradigm,” Paradigm Change in Theology: A Symposium for the Future (ed. Hans Küng and David Tracy; Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  8. In a noted article dated 1993, Tracy is criticized for separating experience and tradition into a dichotomy. From Tracy’s article in Paradigm Change in Theology it is clear that this critique is unfair. See Stephen L. Stell, “Hermeneutics in Theology and the Theology of Hermeneutics: Beyond Lindbeck and Tracy,” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 61:4 (1993), 679–702. See also Tracy “Hermeneutical Reflections in the New Paradigm,” 54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jerry L. Walls, The Oxford Handbook of Eschatology (Oxford/NewYork: Oxford University Press, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  10. See, for example, Ann R. Taket et al. (eds.), Theorising Social Exclusion (New York: Routledge, 2009), 166–184.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wolfhart Pannenberg, Systematic Theology (trans. Geoffrey W. Bromiley; 3 vols.; Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 1991–1998), 1.171.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jakob Wirén, “Hope and Otherness: Christian Eschatology in an Interreligious Horizon,” Testing the Boundaries (ed. Patricia ‘Iolana and Samuel Tongue; Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2011), 57–70.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nerina Rustomji, The Garden and the Fire: Heaven and Hell in Islamic Culture (New York: Columbia University Press, 2009), xvii–xviii.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ahmad H. Sakr, Life, Death and the Life After (New Dehli: Islamic Book Service, 1992), 127–129.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Jesper Svartvik and Jakob Wirén

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wirén, J. (2013). Stereotypes in Christian Theology: Methodological and Eschatological Aspects. In: Svartvik, J., Wirén, J. (eds) Religious Stereotyping and Interreligious Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137342676_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics