Skip to main content

Getting Past the Impasse

Toward a Dialectical Democracy

  • Chapter
Dialectical Democracy through Christian Thought
  • 87 Accesses

Abstract

It has been my argument in this book that the seemingly intractable struggle in the political and economic sphere today is at least partly, and perhaps fundamentally, a struggle between opposing views of human being: the “as if ” atomistic individualism of right-wing libertarians and the “as if ” relationalism of reform liberals. I have also argued that neither position aligns fully with core Christian teaching about human being—the teaching, implied in Scripture but often distorted in subsequent theological tradition, that human being is characterized by a dialectical tension between person and relations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Friedrich A. von Hayek, The Road to Serfdom (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1944).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Saul Newman, “Anarchism, Poststructuralism and the Future of Radical Politics,” SubStance 36, no. 2 (2007): 7.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See Alain Badiou, “The Democratic Emblem,” in Giorgio Agamben et al., Democracy in What State? trans. William McCuiag (New York: Columbia University Press, 2011), 6–15.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jacques Rancière, Dissensus: On Politics and Aesthetics, ed. and trans. Steven Corcoran (New York: Continuum, 2010), 59.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jacques Rancière, Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy, trans. Julie Rose (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999), 102.

    Google Scholar 

  6. “Democracy is not a type of constitution, nor a form of society. The power of the people is not that of a people gathered together, of the majority, or of the working class. It is simply the power peculiar to those who have no more entitlements to govern than to submit.” Jacques Rancière, Hatred of Democracy, trans. Steve Corcoran (New York: Verso, 2006), 46–47.

    Google Scholar 

  7. He says as much in a French-language interview, where he admits that his term post-democracy,” meaning the institutional form that consensus takes, “was for [him] a polemical concept denouncing the equation of democracy with consensus.” Jacques Rancière and François Noudelmann, “La communauté comme dissentiment,” Rue Descartes 42 (November 2003): 98. Translation mine.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chantal Mouffe, The Democratic Paradox (New York: Verso, 2000), 104.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lee Harris, “The Tea Party vs. the Intellectuals,” Policy Review 161 (June–July 2010): 14.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Takis Fotopoulos, “Beyond Statism and the Market Economy: A New Conception of Democracy,” Democracy & Nature: The International Journal of Inclusive Democracy 3, no. 2 (1995), http://www.inclusivedemocracy.org/dn/vol3/fotopoulos_beyond.htm.

  11. Takis Fotopoulos, Towards an Inclusive Democracy (New York: Cassell, 1997), x.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fotopoulos, “Liberal and Socialist ‘Democracies’ versus Inclusive Democracy,” International Journal of Inclusive Democracy 2, no. 2 (January 2006): 14.

    Google Scholar 

  13. David Schweickart, “Economic Democracy: A Worthy Socialism That Would Really Work,” Science and Society 56, no. 1 (Spring 1992): 19.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Robert B. Reich, Tales of a New America (New York: Vintage, 1998), 123–26.

    Google Scholar 

  15. George Lakoff, Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think, 2nd ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002), 179.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. William E. Hudson, The Libertarian Illusion: Ideology, Public Policy, and the Assault on the Common Good (Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2008), 13.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. See Mike Dash, Tulipomania: The Story of the World’s Most Coveted Flower and the Extraordinary Passions It Aroused (New York: Crown, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  18. See Thomas Piketty and Emmanuel Saez, “How Progressive Is the U.S. Federal Tax System? A Historical and International Perspective,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 21, no. 1 (Winter 2007): 22. On tax rates by income, the Congressional Budget Office reports that in 2007, the bottom quintile of households paid an average of 4 percent of their income in federal taxes while the top quintile paid an average of 25.1 percent and the top one percent paid an average of 29.5 percent. Congressional Budget Office, “Average Federal Tax Rates in 2007,” June 2010, p. 1, http://www.cbo.gov/publications/collections/tax/2010/AverageFedTaxRates2007.pdf. On effective tax rates, see “Warren Buffett Says the Super-Rich Pay Lower Taxes than Others,” PolitiFact.com, August 18, 2011, http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2011/aug/18/warren-buffett/warren-buffett-says-super-rich-pay-lower-taxes-oth.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Robert H. Frank, “The Problem with Flat-Tax Fever,” New York Times, November 5, 2011, http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/06/business/flat-tax-doesnt-solve-inequality-problem.html.

  20. Alan Richardson and John Bowden, ed., The Westminster Dictionary of Christian Theology (Philadelphia: The Westminster Press, 1983), s.v. “Prophecy,” 473.

    Google Scholar 

  21. David R. Brockman, No Longer the Same: Religious Others and the Liberation of Christian Theology (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2013 David R. Brockman

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brockman, D.R. (2013). Getting Past the Impasse. In: Dialectical Democracy through Christian Thought. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137342539_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics