Abstract
The postsecular transformation of the international society is the product of a growing dissatisfaction with existing secular arrangements and of an increasing awareness that “values such as democracy, freedom, equality, inclusion, and justice may not necessarily be best pursued within an exclusively immanent secular framework. Quite the opposite, the secular may well be a potential site of isolation, domination, violence and exclusion.”1 The thriving debate on religion in international politics has only in the last few years seen the emergence of the postsecular as a new object of study. Following an initial focus on the “return of religion” and the “power of secularism” in international politics, the focus on the post-secular seems to encompass, at least in its very terminology, the idea of a paradigm shift. This is an attempt to move beyond the secular and thus the secular/religious divide, which can be considered one of the foundational dimensions of Western modernity. The question raised by the postsecular, then, is not just one of incorporation of the presence of religion or of the power of secularism into existing theoretical frameworks, but one of conceptual innovation to account for a transformation that invests the very structures of consciousness and power, and existing understandings of political community.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Luca Mavelli and Fabio Petito, “The Postsecular in International Relations: An Overview,” Review of International Studies, 38, 5 (2012): 931.
Hans Joas, Braucht der Mensch Religion? Über Erfahrungen der Selbsttranszendenz (Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder, 2004), 124.
Hent de Vries, “Before, around, and beyond the Theologico-Political,” in Hent de Vries and Lawrence E. Sullivan, Political Theologies: Public Religions in a Post-Secular World (New York: Fordham University Press, 2006).
Maeve, Cooke, “A Secular State for a Postsecular Society? Postmetaphysical Political Theory and the Place of Religion,” Constellations, 14, 2 (2007): 224–238; emphasis in the original.
Jurgën Habermas, The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory, edited by Pablo De Greiff and Ciaran Cronin (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1998).
Andrew Linklater, “The Problem of Community in International Relations,” Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 15, 2 (1990): 135–153; The Transformation of Political Community: Ethical Foundations of the Post-Westphalian Era (University of South Carolina Press, 1998).
See Luca Mavelli and Fabio Petito with Kimberly Hutchings (eds.), “The Postsecular in International Relations,” Special Issue of the Review of International Studies, 38, 5 (2012): 931–1115; Luca Mavelli, Europe’s Encounter with Islam: The Secular and the Postsecular (Abingdon and New York: Routledge, 2012);
Mariano Barbato, “Conceptions of the Self for Post-secular Emancipation: Towards a Pilgrim’s Guide to Global Justice,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 39, 2 (2010): 547–64;
Mariano Barbato and Friedrich Kratochwil, “Towards a Post-secular Political Order?,” European Political Science Review, 1, 3 (2009): 317–340.
According to Joseph Camilleri, to some extent the postsecular could be conceptualized as “one striking manifestation” of “the rise of identity politics.” See Joseph A. Camilleri, “Postsecularist Discourse in an ‘Age of Transition,’” Review of International Studies, 38, 5 (2012): 1019–1039, 1030.
For a discussion and critique of this narrative, see Scott M. Thomas, “Taking Religious and Cultural Pluralism Seriously: The Global Resurgence of Religion and the Transformation of International Society,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 29, 3 (2000): 815–841, 819.
Michael C. Williams, “Identity and the Politics of Security,” European Journal of International Relations, 4, 2 (1998): 204–225, 213.
John Bossy, Christianity in the West, 1400–1700 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985).
Philip S. Gorski, “Historicizing the Secularization Debate: Church, State, and Society in Late Medieval and Early Modern Europe, ca. 1300 to 1700,” American Sociological Review, 65, 1 (2000): 138–167, 143.
Hans J. Morgenthau, Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (New York: McGraw Hill, 1993 [1948], 9.
Dianne Kirby, “Religion and the Cold War—An Introduction,” in Dianne Kirby (ed), Religion and the Cold War (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2003), 1.
Ronald Reagan, “Remarks at the Annual Convention of the National Association of Evangelicals in Orlando, Florida,” March 8, 1983, http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=41023, accessed January 24, 2013.
Stefan Rossbach, Gnostic Wars: The Cold War in the Context of a History of Western Spirituality (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1999).
Raymond Haberski Jr, God and War: American Civil Religion since 1945 (Rutgers University Press, 2012).
Max Weber, “Politics as a Vocation,” in Hans H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills (eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991 [1919]), 123.
Max Weber, “Religious Rejections of the World and Their Directions,” in Hans H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills (eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991 [1915]), 353.
Jurgën Habermas, Between Naturalism and Religion: Philosophical Essays (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2008); Barbato, “Conceptions of the Self for Post-secular Emancipation,” 549.
George W. Bush, “State of the Union,” January 29, 2002, http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=29644, accessed August 7, 2013.
Daniel Bell, “The Return of the Sacred? The Argument on the Future of Religion,” The British Journal of Sociology, 28, 4 (1977): 419–449.
Gilles Kepel, The Revenge of God: The Resurgence of Islam, Christianity, and Judaism in the Modern World (Penn State Press, 1994).
Scott M. Thomas, The Global Resurgence of Religion and the Transformation of International Relations (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005).
Peter L. Berger (ed.), The Desecularization of the World: Resurgent Religion and World Politics (Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 1999).
José Casanova, Public Religions in the Modern World (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994), 20.
Elizabeth Shakman Hurd, “The Political Authority of Secularism in International Relations,” European Journal of International Relations, 10, 2 (2004): 235–262, 238.
José Casanova, “Public Religions Revisited,” in Hent De Vries (ed.), Religion: Beyond a Concept (New York: Fordham University Press, 2007), 103, citing and paraphrasing
Talal Asad, Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003), 192 and Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Hussein Ali Agrama, “Secularism, Sovereignty, Indeterminacy: Is Egypt a Secular or a Religious State?,” Comparative Studies in Society and History, 52, 3 (2010): 495–593, 500.
Jurgën Habermas, “Religion in the Public Sphere,” European Journal of Philosophy, 14, 1 (2006), 1–25, 15. For critiques of Habermas’s approach to postsecularity, see
Fred Dallmayr, “Post-secularity and (Global) Politics: A Need for Radical Redefinition,” Review of International Studies, 38, 05 (2012): 963–973;
Antonio Cerella, “Religion and Political Form: Carl Schmitt’s Genealogy of Politics as Critique of Habermas’s Post-secular Discourse.” Review of International Studies, 38, 5 (2012): 975–994;
Adrian Pabst, “The Secularism of Post-secularity: Religion, Realism, and the Revival of Grand Theory in IR.” Review of International Studies, 38, 05 (2012): 995–1017;
Luca Mavelli, “Postsecular Resistance, the Body, and the 2011 Egyptian Revolution,” Review of International Studies, 38, 5 (2012): 1057–1078; and Mavelli, Europe’s Encounter with Islam: The Secular and the Postsecular.
William T. Cavanaugh, The Myth of Religious Violence: Secular Ideology and the Roots of Modern Conflict (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), 4.
See Peter J. Katzenstein, “A World of Plural and Pluralist Civilizations: Multiple Actors, Traditions, and Practices,” in Peter J. Katzenstein (ed.), Civilizations in World Politics: Plural and Pluralist Perspectives (New York: Routledge, 2010), 1–40;
Shmuel N. Eisenstadt (ed.), Reflections on Multiple Modernities: European, Chinese and Other Interpretations (Leiden: Brill, 2002);
Johann P. Arnason, Civilisations in Dispute: Historical Questions and Theoretical Traditions (Leiden, Boston: Brill, 2003).
Ashis Nandy, “Defining a New Cosmopolitanism: Towards a Dialogue of Asian Civilizations,” in Kuan-Hsing Chen (ed.), Trajectories: Inter-Asia Cultural Studies (London: Routledge, 1998), 146; see also
Ashis Nandy, “An Anti-secularist Manifesto,” India International Quarterly, 22, 1 (1995): 35–64.
Hedley Bull, The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics (London: Macmillan, 1977), 305.
Gerard Delanty (ed.), Europe and Asia beyond East and West (London: Routledge, 2013).
Hussein Ali Agrama, “Secularism, Sovereignty, Indeterminacy: Is Egypt a Secular or a Religious State?,” Comparative Studies in Society and History, 52, 3 (2010): 495–593, 500.
Talal Asad, Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003), 210.
Charles Taylor, A Secular Age (Harvard: Harvard University Press, 2007), 534.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2014 Luca Mavelli and Fabio Petito
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mavelli, L., Petito, F. (2014). Towards a Postsecular International Politics. In: Mavelli, L., Petito, F. (eds) Towards a Postsecular International Politics. Culture and Religion in International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137341785_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137341785_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-46518-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-34178-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Intern. Relations & Development CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)