Abstract
The Netherlands has a rich philanthropic history, dating back to the late Middle ages (Prak, 1998). Before the modern welfare state, poor relief in the Netherlands was predominantly provided by the religious elites. As early as 1500, local clergy and noble men provided poor relief to those who lacked substantial means (Prak, 1998). The main motive for these elites to provide poor relief was to maintain order in the municipalities (De Swaan, 1988). However, the elites also received some private benefits by providing poor relief: they gained status, involvement in influential networks and salvation for their soul (Van Leeuwen, 1994). A famous example of Dutch private poor relief are the ‘hofjes,’ a privately funded courtyard with almshouses built around it. These almshouses provided social security in the form of housing for primarily older women, who had no other place to live (Looijenstein, 2011). Well into the 20th century, Dutch poor relief remained organized locally by religious institutions. During the first half of the 20th century, Dutch society was divided vertically along its four ‘pillars’ — Roman Catholic, Protestant, social democratic and liberal — to which all people belonged. All four pillars had their own political parties, broadcasting associations and nonprofit organizations, including educational institutions, hospitals, sport clubs and leisure organizations (Bax, 1988). The social distance between people from different pillars was large, and people from one pillar rarely interacted with people from another pillar.
Keywords
- Gross Domestic Product
- Religious Service
- Religious Attendance
- Charitable Organization
- Global Civil Society
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bax, E.H. (1988). Modernization and Cleavage in Dutch Society. A Study of Long Term Economic and Social Change. Groningen, The Netherlands: University of Groningen.
Bekkers, R. (2002). Giften van Gerelormeerden aan Maatschappelijke Doelen in Nederland [Gifts of Reformed Protestants to Philanthropic Organizations in the Netherlands]. Sociologische Gids, 49(4), pp. 386–408.
Bekkers, R. (2003). Trust, accreditation, and philanthropy in the Netherlands. Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32, pp. 596–615.
Bekkers, R. (2010). The Benefits of Accreditation lor Fundraising Nonprofit Organizations in the Netherlands. In M.K. Gugerty & A. Prakash (Eds.), Nonprofit Clubs: Voluntary Regulation of Nonprofit and Nongovernmental Organizations (pp. 253–279). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bekkers, R., & Boonstoppel, E. (2011). Geven door huishoudens [Giving by Households]. In T.N.M. Schuyt, B. Gouwenberg, & R. Bekkers (Eds.), Geven in Nederland 2011: Giften, Sponsoring, Legaten en Vrijwilligerswerk (pp. 31–60). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Reed Business.
Bekkers, R., & Mariani, E. (2009). Gebruik van de giftenaftrek in Nederland, 1977–2007 [Use of Charitable Deductions, 1977–2007]. In T.N.M. Schuyt, B. Gouwenberg, R. Bekkers, M.M. Meijer, & P. Wiepking (Eds.), Geven in Nederland 2009. Giften, Legaten, Sponsoring en Vrijwilligerswerk (pp. 176–185). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Reed Business.
Belastingdienst (2012). Algemeen Nut Beogende Instellingen [Public Benefit Institutions]. Retrieved April 19, 2012, from http://www.belastingdienst.nl/rekenhulpen/giften/anbi_zoeken.
Boonstoppel, E., & Wiepking, P. (2011). Geven door vermogende Nederlanders [Giving by HNW Households]. In T. Schuyt, B. Gouwenberg & R. Bekkers (Eds.), Geven in Nederland 2011. Giften, Legaten, Sponsoring en Vrijwilligerswerk (pp. 165–185). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Reed Business.
Boonstoppel, E. & Wiepking, P. (2013). Geven als een sociaal dilemma. Motivationele, strategische en structurele verklaringen voor het geelgedrag van vermogende Nederlanders [Giving as a Social Dilemma. Motivational, Strategic and Structural Explanations for Giving by HNW Households]. In V. Buskens & I. Maas (Eds.), Boekeditie Mens & Maatschappij. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.
Burger, A., Dekker, P., Toepler, S., Anheier, H., & Salamon, L. (1999). The Netherlands: Key Features of the Dutch Nonprofit Sector. In L. Salamon, H. Anheier, R. List, S. Toepler, & S.W. Sokolowski (Eds.), Global Civil Society: Dimensions of the Nonprofit Sector (pp. 145–162). Balimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins Centre lor Civil Society.
CBF (2012). Regelement CBF Keur, versie 18 [Regulations CBF Accreditation]. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Centraal Bureau Fondsenwerving.
CBS (2008). Weinig Nederlanders gaan regelmatig naar kerk of moskee [Few Dutch go Regularly to Church or Mosque]. Voorburg, The Netherlands: CBS.
CBS (2012). Statline databank: Kerkelijkheid en kerksheid van de bevolking van 18 jaar en ouder [Religious Affiliation and Religious Attendance of the Population]. Voorburg, The Netherlands: CBS.
De Swaan, A. (1988). In Care of the State: Health Care, Education and Welfare in Europe and the USA in the Modern Era. Oxford, UK: Polity Press.
GINPS01 (2001). Giving in the Netherlands Panel Study 2001. [Computer File]. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: VU University Amsterdam.
GINPS05 (2006). Giving in the Netherlands Panel Study 2005. [Machine-readable Data File]. P. Wiepking, R. Bekkers, T.N.M. Schuyt, & B.M. Gouwenberg [Principle Investigator(s)]. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: VU University, Philanthropic Studies.
GINPS10_HNW (2010). Giving in the Netherlands Panel Study 2010 High Net Worth Supplement. [Machine-readable Data File]. P. Wiepking, B.Jansen, & E. Boonstoppel [Principle Investigator(s)]. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: VU University, Philanthropic Studies.
Hemels, S. (2011). Het financiële belang van de ANBI-status: Hoe gebruik je hem en hoekrijgje hem? [The Financial Relevance of the ANBI Status]. Paper Presented at Erasmus Centre for Strategic Philanthropy Seminar. Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
ITA (2001). Article 2.10, Article 2.13 and paragraph 5.1. Wet Inkomstenbelasting 2001 [Dutch Income Tax Act 2001].
Jacobs, E. (2006). Donateursvereniging Nederland [Donorassociation in the Netherlands]. Retrieved April 25, 2012, from http://www.goededoelenwereld.nl/fileadmin/donateursvereniging/.
Long, J.S. (1997). Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Looijenstein, H. (2011). The land of Almshouses. Almshouses in the Netherlands, ca.1350–1800, Almshouses in Europe from the late Middle Ages to the Present — Comparisons and Peculiarities. Haarlem, The Netherlands: International Institute of Social History.
Mariani, E.E. (2011). The Ideal Tax Treatment of Donations. Designing New Piscal Incentives for Giving to Charity in the Netherlands. Paper Presented April 18 at the 2011 Reforming Fundraising Regulation Conference. Brisbane, Australia.
OECD (2012). Public Social Expenditures in OECD Countries. Retrieved April 25, 2012, from http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?datasetcode=SOCX_AGG.
Prak, M. (1998). Armenzorg 1500–1800 [Poor Relief 1500–1800]. In V.J. Gerwen & M.H.D. Van Leeuwen (Eds.), Studies over zekerheidsarrangementen. Risico’s, risicobestrijding en verzekeringen in Nederland vanaf de Middeleeuwen (pp. 49–90). Amsterdam/Den Haag, The Nethrlands: NEHA.
Rooney, P.M., Steinberg, K.S., & Schervish, P.G. (2001). A methodological comparison of giving surveys: Indiana as a test case. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 30(3), pp. 551–568.
Salamon, L.M., & Anheier, H.K. (1998). Social origins of civil society: Explaining the nonprofit sector cross-nationally. Voluntas, 9, pp. 213–248.
Schuyt, T, Gouwenberg, B., Meijer, M.-M., Bekkers, R., & Wiepking, P. (2007). Geven in Nederland 2007. Giften, Legaten, Sponsoring en Vrijwilligerswerk [Giving in the Netherlands]. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Reed Business.
Schuyt, T.N.M., Gouwenberg, B., & Bekkers, R. (2011). Geven in Nederland 2011. Giften, Legaten, Sponsoring en Vrijwilligerswerk. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Reed Business.
UCLA Academic Technology Services (2012). Stata Data Analysis Examples. Tobit Analysis. Retrieved May 21, 2012, from http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/dae/tobit.htm.
Van Leeuwen, M.H.D. (1994). Logic of charity: Poor relief in preindustrial Europe. Journal of Interdisciplinary History, XXIV(4), pp. 589–613.
Van Leeuwen, M.H.D. (1999). Armenzorg en charitas, ca. 1800–2000. Een historische erfenis [Poor Relief and Charity, ca. 1800–2000]. In R. Van De Bie & P. Dehning (Eds.), Nationaal Goed. Leiten en cijfers over onze samenleving ca. 1800–1999 (pp. 159–178). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: CBS.
VFI (2012a). Goede Doelen Rapport 2011 [Report Philanthropic Organizations 2011]. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: VFI.
VFI (2012b). Persbericht Week van het Testament [Week of the Will]. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: VFI.
Vos, G. (2006). SGP-stemmers per gemeente Tweede Kamer 2003 [Number of Voters for the Reformed Protestant Political Party in the 2003 Elections, per Municipality]. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from http://commons.wikimedia.Org/wiki/In1age:SGP-stemmers_per_gemeente_Tweede_Kamer_2003.png#file.
Wiepking, P. (2008). For the Love of Mankind: A Sociological Study on Charitable Giving. Doctoral dissertation, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: VU University.
Wiepking, P., Bekkers, R., Gouwenberg, B., Schuyt, T.N.M., Mariani, E., & Wijs, S.D. (2007). Geven door huishoudens en individuen [Giving by Households and Individuals]. In T.N.M. Schuyt, B. Gouwenberg, R. Bekkers, M.M. Meijer, & P. Wiepking (Eds.), Geven in Nederland. Giften, legaten, sponsoring en vrijwilligerswerk (pp. 31–69). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Reed Business.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Pamala Wiepking and René Bekkers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wiepking, P., Bekkers, R. (2015). Giving in the Netherlands: A Strong Welfare State with a Vibrant Nonprofit Sector. In: Wiepking, P., Handy, F. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Global Philanthropy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137341532_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137341532_13
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-34323-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-34153-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)