Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The European Court of Auditors and Its Relationship with National Independent Audit Institutions: The Evolving Audit Function in the EU Multilevel System

  • Chapter
The Palgrave Handbook of the European Administrative System

Part of the book series: European Administrative Governance ((EAGOV))

Abstract

This chapter analyzes, from a transdisciplinary administrative science, public policy, and legal perspective, the role that the European Court of Auditors (ECA) and the national external audit institutions play in the emerging EU administrative system. The analysis is structured around three research questions: (i) What is the specific role that the ECA plays in the EU political and administrative system? (ii) Is the emerging EU administrative system transforming the preexisting audit institutions in their function as independent oversight bodies for public administrations, and what is the impact of the EU multilevel administrative system on the established processes of administrative control and accountability? (iii) How far is the supranationalization of the audit function replacing independence with interdependence? The chapter starts from the hypothesis that for the audit work carried out by the ECA and by national external audit institutions, the distinction between member-state level and EU level has diminished to the point where multilevel actors create coordinated forms of administrative capacities that are to a certain degree able to act independently from national governments (see Aden, 2006; Hofmann and Türk, 2006; Trondal and Peters, 2013) and also from the European Commission.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ackrill, R. and Kay, A. (2006) ‘Historical-Institutional Perspectives on the Development of the EU Budget System’, Journal of European Public Policy, 13, 113–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aden, H. (2006) ‘Administrative Governance in the Fields of EU Police and Judicial coOperation’, in Hofmann, H. C. H. and Türk, A. H. (eds.) EU Administrative Governance (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar), 341–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aden, H. (2012) ‘Haushalt und Finanzierung der EU’, in Furtak, F. T. and Groß, B. (eds.) Lernziel Europa. Integrationsfelder und-prozesse (Frankfurt a. M.: Lang), 141–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alemann, F. von. (2006) Die Handlungsform der interinstitutionellen Vereinbarung. Eine Untersuchung des Interorganverhältnisses der europäischen Verfassung (Heidelberg: Springer).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Algemene Rekenkamer. (2007) Report on the Dutch EU Member State Declaration 2006 (The Hague: Algemene Rekenkamer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Algemene Rekenkamer. (2012) EU Trend Report 2012 (Den Haag: Algemene Rekenkamer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Alves, R. H. and Alfonso, O. (2009) ‘The Reform of the EU Budget: Finding New Own Resources’, Intereconomics, 44(3), 177–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barzelay, M. (1997) ‘Central Audit Institutions and Performance Auditing: A Comparative Analysis of Organizational Strategies in the OECD’, Governance, 10, 235–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barzelay, M., Levy, R. and Porras-Gomez, A.-M. (2011) ‘The Reform of Financial Management in the European Commission: A Public Management Policy Cycle Case Study’, Public Administration, 89, 1546–1567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldeira, V. (2005) ‘The Coordination of Internal Controls: The Single Audit — Towards a European Union Internal Control Framework’, in Garcia Crespo, M. (ed.) Public Expenditure Control in Europe: CoordinatingAudit Functions in the European Union (Chaltenham, UK: Edward Elgar), 184–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, A. (2005) ‘External Audit Institutions: The European Court of Auditors and Its Relationship with the National Audit Institutions of the Member States’, in Garcia Crespo, M. (ed.) Public Expenditure Control in Europe: CoordinatingAudit Functions in the European Union (Chaltenham, UK: Edward Elgar), 127–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission de Contrôle de la Communauté Economique Européene. (1971) Rapport relatif aux comptes de l’exercice pour 1970 (Brussels).

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union. (2007) ‘Council Decision of 7 June 2007 on the System of the European Communities’ Own Resources’, Official Journal of the European Union, L 163, 23 June 2007, 17–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2008) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the Court of Auditors: Towards a Common Understanding of the Concept of Tolerable Risk of Error (Brussels: COM (2008) 866 final).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2013a) Report on Budgetary and Financial Management. Financial Year 2012 (Brussels: Directorate General for Budget).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2013b) Proposal for a Council Regulation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (Brussels: COM (2013) 534 final).

    Google Scholar 

  • ECA (European Court of Auditors). (2004) ‘Opinion 2/2004 [...] on the “single audit” model (and a proposal for a Community internal control framework)’, Official Journal of the European Union, C 107, 30 April 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECA (European Court of Auditors). (2005) ‘Special Report No 1/2005 Concerning the Management of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF), Together with the Commission’s Replies’, Official Journal of the European Union, C 202, 18 August 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECA (European Court of Auditors). (2007) ‘Opinion No. 6/2007 on the Annual Summaries of Member States; “national declarations” of Member States and Audit Work on EU Funds of National Audit Bodies’, Official Journal of the European Union, C 216, 14 September 2007, 3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECA (European Court of Auditors). (2008a) The DAS Methodology (Luxemburg: ECA).

    Google Scholar 

  • ECA (European Court of Auditors). (2008b) International Peer Review of the European Court of Auditors (Luxemburg: ECA).

    Google Scholar 

  • ECA (European Court of Auditors). (2011) Follow-Up of Special Report No. 1/2005 Concerning the Management of the European Anti-Fraud Office (Luxemburg: ECA/Publication Office of the EU: ECA Special Report No. 2/2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • ECA (European Court of Auditors). (2012a) Annual Activity Report 2011 (Luxemburg: ECA/Publication Office of the EU).

    Google Scholar 

  • ECA (European Court of Auditors). (2012b) ‘Annual Report on the Implementation of the EU Budget Concerning the Financial Year 2011’, Official Journal of the European Union, C 344, 12 November 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECA (European Court of Auditors). (2012c) Cost-Effectiveness of Cohesion Policy Investments in Energy Efficiency (Luxemburg: ECA/Publication Office of the EU: ECA Special Report No. 21/2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • ECA (European Court of Auditors). (2012d) Do the European Integration Fund and European Refugee Fund Contribute Effectively to the Integration of Third-Country Nationals? (Luxemburg: ECA/Publication Office of the EU: ECA Special Report No. 22/2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • ECA (European Court of Auditors). (2013) Annual Activity Report 2012 (Luxemburg: ECA/Publication Office of the EU).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament. (2005) 2003 Discharge: Section III of the General Budget, P6_TA(2005)0092 (Brussels/Strasburg: European Parliament).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament. (2012) Decision of 10 May 2012 on Discharge in Respect of the Implementation of the General Budget of the European Union for the Financial Year 2010, Section III — Commission (Brussels/Strasburg: European Parliament, P7_TA(2012)0153).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament, Council, Commission. (2006) ‘Interinstitutional Agreement [...] on Budgetary Discipline and Sound Financial Management’, Official Journal of the European Union, C 139, 14 June 2006, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gall, A. Freiherr von and Schmitz, F. (2002) ‘Rechnungshöfe und Europäische Integration’ in Eibelshäuser, M. (ed.) Finanzpolitik und Finanzkontrolle — Partner für Veränderung (Baden-Baden: Nomos), 337–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • German Audit Institutions. (2008) EU Report 2008 (Bonn: Presidents of the Federal Court of Auditors and 15 State Courts of Auditors).

    Google Scholar 

  • German Audit Institutions. (2013) EU Report 2012 (Bonn: Presidents of the Federal Court of Auditors and 15 State Courts of Auditors).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlow, C. (2002) Accountability in the European Union (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • HM Treasury and National Audit Office. (2008) Consolidated Statement on the Use of EU Funds in the UK. For the Year Ended 31 March 2007 (London: The Stationery Office).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, H. C. H. and Türk, A. (2006) ‘An Introduction to EU Administrative Governance’, in Hofmann, H. C. H. and Türk, A. H. (eds.) EU Adminstrative Governance (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar), 1–8.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • House of Lords, European Union Committee. (2006) Financial Management and Fraud in the European Union: Perceptions, Facts and Proposals. Volume I: Report (London: The Stationary Office).

    Google Scholar 

  • Inghelram, J. (2000) ‘The European Court of Auditors: Current Legal Issues’, Common Market Law Review, 37(2), 129–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laffan, B. (1999) ‘Becoming a “Living Institution”: The Evolution of the European Court of Auditors’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 37, 251–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1995) Das Recht der Gesellschaft (Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mähring, M. (2006) ‘Externe Finanzkontrolle im europäischen Mehrebenensystem — Betrachtungen zu den föderativen Rahmenbedingungen im EU-Mitgliedstaat Deutschland’, Die ÖffentlicheVerwaltung, 59(5), 195–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • NAO (National Audit Office). (2009) Financial Management in the European Union (London: NAO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigsrevisionen. (2006) The Statement on the Audit of EU Funds in Denmark (Copenhagen: Rigsrevisionen), 137–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigsrevisionen. (2008) Audit of EU Funds in Denmark (Copenhagen: Rigsrevisionen).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigsrevisionen. (2012) Report to the Public Accounts Committee on the Audit of EU Funds in Denmark in 2011 (Copenhagen: Rigsrevisionen).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez Barrueco, M. L. (2008) El Tribunal de Cuentas Europeo: la superación de sus limitaciones mediante la colaboración instituciona (Madrid: Dykinson).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thäsler, C. (2012) Finanzkontrolle im europäischen Mehrebenensystem. Die Zusammenarbeit der europäischen Rechnungskontrollbehörden und die Perspektiven für einen externen Finanzkontrollverbund (Göttingen: V&Runipress).

    Google Scholar 

  • Trondal, J. and Peters, B. G. (2013) ‘The Rise of European Administrative Space. Lessons Learned’, Journal of European Public Policy, 20, 295–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wedel, H. von. (2008) ‘Die Zuverlässigkeitserklärung des Europäischen Rechnungshofs nach Art. 247 des Vertrags zur Gründung der Europäischen Gemeinschaft und ihre Auswirkungen auf Recht und Praxis der Mitgliedstaaten’, in Magiera, S., Sommermann, K.-P. and Ziller, J. (eds.) Verwaltungswissenschaft und Verwaltungspraxis in nationaler und transnationaler Perspektive: Festschrift für Heinrich Siedentopf zum 70. Geburtstag (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot), 145–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilms, G. (2007) ‘Die Reform des EU-Haushalts im Lichte der Finanziellen Vorausschau 2007–2013 und des Vertrages von Lissabon — neue Perspektiven für die Europäische Union?’ Europarecht, 42, 707–743.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Berlin School of Economics and Law (Hochschule für Wirtschaft und Recht Berlin), Germany

    Hartmut Aden (Professor of German and European Public Law)

Authors
  1. Hartmut Aden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. German University of Administrative Sciences, Speyer, Germany

    Michael W. Bauer (Jean Monnet Professor and Chair of Comparative Public Administration and Policy Analysis) (Jean Monnet Professor and Chair of Comparative Public Administration and Policy Analysis)

  2. Department of Political Science and Management, University of Agder, Norway

    Jarle Trondal (Professor of Political Science and Public Administration, Professor of European Studies) (Professor of Political Science and Public Administration, Professor of European Studies)

  3. ARENA Centre for European Studies, University of Oslo, Norway

    Jarle Trondal (Professor of Political Science and Public Administration, Professor of European Studies) (Professor of Political Science and Public Administration, Professor of European Studies)

Copyright information

© 2015 Hartmut Aden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Aden, H. (2015). The European Court of Auditors and Its Relationship with National Independent Audit Institutions: The Evolving Audit Function in the EU Multilevel System. In: Bauer, M.W., Trondal, J. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of the European Administrative System. European Administrative Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137339898_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation