Skip to main content

Part of the book series: European Administrative Governance ((EAGOV))

  • 514 Accesses

Abstract

The current economic and financial crisis has hit the European economies and their national public finances hard. In their efforts toward budget consolidation, many EU member states are trying to cut administrative expenditure. As in earlier times of substantial (financial) strain, government institutions facing fiscal austerity may tend to initiate budget cuts thereby downsizing permanent staff and upsizing short-term contracted staff (Hall, 2002). This trend — referred to in this chapter as a shift toward ‘contracted government — follows one of the curative prescriptions of the New Public Management (NPM) reform wave and is designed to promote greater flexibility in, and performance of’, public services (Laegreid and Wise, 2007). Although this trend has been extensively studied for national-level bureaucracies (for example, Hall, 2002; Lagreid and Wise, 2007), contracted government above the state has thus far escaped comprehensive analysis. Moreover, whereas NPM-inspired reforms mainly concerned outsourcing government capacities toward the private sector, ‘contracted government’ involves outsourcing public servants that already are ‘good bureaucrats’ from one government institution to another. Based on novel survey data, this chapter of fers a comprehensive analysis of contracted government at actor level — that is, among seconded national experts (SNEs) — within the Commission.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ansell, C. K. (2004) ‘Territoriality, Authority, and Democracy’, in Ansell, C. K. and Di Palma, G. (eds.) Restructuring Territoriality. Europe and the United States Compared (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 3–18.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ashford, B. E. and Mael, F. (2004) ‘Social Identity Theory and the Organization’, in Hatch, M. J. and Schultz, M. (eds.) Organizational Identity: A Reader (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 134–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M. N. and Finnemore, M. (1999) ‘The Politics, Power, and Pathologies of International Organizations’, International Organization, 53, 699–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, M. W. and Ege, J. (2011) ‘Post-Kinnock: The De-politization of the European Commission’s Bureaucracy’, Paper presented at Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, June 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, T. (1997) ‘Tensions of European Governance: Politicised Bureaucracy and Multiple Accountability in the European Commission’, Journal of European Public Policy, 4, 73–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CLENAD. (Comité de Liaison des Expert Nationaux Détaches) (2003) Report of the Working Group ‘Life after SNE?’ (Brussels: The Liaison Committee for National Experts).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombes, D. (1970) Politics and Bureaucracy of the European Union (London: Georg Allen and Unwin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, R. W. (1969) ‘The Executive Head: An Essay on Leadership in International Organization’, International Organization, 23, 205–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duchêne, F. (1994) Jean Monnet. The First Statesman of Interdependence (New York: W.W. Norton & Company).

    Google Scholar 

  • Egeberg, M. (1999) ‘The Impact of Bureaucratic Structure on Policy Making’, Public Administration, 77, 155–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egeberg, M. (2003) ‘How Bureaucratic Structure Matters: An Organizational Perspective’, in Peters, B. G. and Pierre, J. (eds.) Handbook of Public Administration (London: Sage), 157–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egeberg, M. (ed.) (2006) Multilevel Union Administration. The Transformation of Executive Politics in Europe (London: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Egeberg, M., Schaefer, G. F. and Trondal, J. (2003) ‘The Many Faces of EU Committee Governance’, West European Politics, 26, 19–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egeberg, M. and Trondal, J. (1999) ‘Differentiated Integration in Europe: The Case of the EEA Country Norway’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 37, 133–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • uropean Commission. (2001) European Governance (White Paper. Com(2001)428. Brussels).

    Google Scholar 

  • uropean Commission. (2002) Reformingthe Commission. An Administration at the Service of Halfa Billion Europeans (Brussels).

    Google Scholar 

  • uropean Commission. (2004) Commission Decision of 27 February 2004 (C(2004)577, Brussels).

    Google Scholar 

  • uropean Commission. (2008) Commission Decision of 12.11.2008 Laying Down Rules on the Secondment to the Commission of National Experts and National Experts in Prof essional Training (Brussels).

    Google Scholar 

  • uropean Commission. (2011a) Amending Letter No. 2 to the Draft General Budget 2012 (COM(2011) 576 final, Brussels, 16.09.2011) available from http://ec.europa.eu/budget/ library/biblio/documents/2012/LR/LR2_2012_COM.2011.576_en.pdf.

  • uropean Commission. (2011b) Statement of Estimates of the Commission for 2012 (Preparation of the 2012 Draft Budget) (Document III/SEC(2011) 498. Brussels, 20.4.2011) available from http://ec.europa.eu/budget/library/biblio/documents/2012/ DB2012/DB2012_docIII_figuresen.pdf

  • Geuijen, K., ’t Hart, P., Princen, S. and Yesilkagit, K. (2008) The New Eurocrats. National Civil Servants in EU Policy-Making (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gulick, L. (1937) ‘Notes on the Theory of Organizations. With Special References to Government in the United States’, in Gulick, L. and Urwick, L. (eds.) Papers on the Science of Administration (New York: Institute of Public Administration, Columbia University), 1–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, D. T. (2002) Careers in and out of Organizations (Thousand Oaks: SAGE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hof mann, H. C. H. (2008) ‘Mapping the European Administrative Space’, West European Politics, 31, 662–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L. (1997) ‘A House with Differing Views: The European Commission and Cohesion Policy’, in Nugent, N. (ed.) At the Heart of the Union. Studies of the European Commission (Houndmills: Macmillan Press), 89–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L. (2005) ‘Several Roads Lead to International Norms, but Few via International Socialization. A Case Study of the European Commission’, International Organization, 59, 861–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler-Koch, B. (2005) ‘European Governance and System Integration’, Eurogov C-05-01.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laegreid, P. and Wise, L. R. (2007) ‘Reforming Human Resource Management in Civil Service Systems: Recruitment, Mobility, and Representativeness’, in Raadschelders, J. C. N., Toonen, T. A. J. and Van der Meer, F. M. (eds.) The Civil Service in the 21st Century. Comparative Perspectives (Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan), 169–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (2010) The Ambiguities of Experience (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. and Olsen, J. P. (1998) ‘The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders’, International Organization, 52, 943–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, Z. and Geys, B. (2012) ‘Instrumental Calculation, Cognitive Role-Playing, or Both? Self-Perceptions of Seconded National Experts in the European Commission’, Journal of European Public Policy, 19, 1357–1376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nugent, N. (2006) The Government and Politics of the European Union (Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, J. P. (2010) Governing Through Institutional Building (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Šefčovič, M. (2011) Adjusting the European Civil Service to the Challenges of Today (Communication to the College by Vice-President Maro§Sefœvic, Commissioner for Interinstitutional Relations and Administration, Brussels, 29.06.2011), available from http://ec.europa.eu/commission_20102014/sefcovic/documents/communication_to_ college_en.pdf

  • Simon, H. (1957) Administrative Behaviour, Second Edition (New York: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Skowronek, S. (1982) Buildinga New American State. The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe, A. L. (2001) When Formality Works. Authority and Abstraction in Law and Organizations (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Suvarierol, S. (2007) Beyond the Myth of Nationality: A Study on the Networks of European Commission Officials (Delft: Eburon).

    Google Scholar 

  • Suvarierol, S. and van den Berg, C. (2008) ‘Bridge Builders or Bridgeheads in Brussels? The World of Seconded National Experts’, in Geuijen, K., ’t Hart, P., Princen, S. and Yesilkagit, K. (eds.) The New Eurocrats. National Civil Servants in EU Policy-Making (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press), 103–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thatcher, M. (2005) ‘The Third Force? Independent Regulatory Agencies and Elected Politicians in Europe’, Governance, 18, 347–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelen, K. and Steinmo, S. (1992) ‘Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics’ in Steinmo, S., Thelen, K. and Longstreth, F. (eds.) Structuring Politics. Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 1–32.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Trondal, J. (2004) ‘Political Dynamics of the Parallel Administration of the European Commission’, in Smith, A. (ed.) Politics and the European Commission. Actors, Interdependence, Legitimacy (London: Routledge), 67–82.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Trondal, J. (2006) ‘Governing at the Frontier of the European Commission. The Case of Seconded National Experts’, West European Politics, 29, 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trondal, J. (2008) ‘The Anatomy of Autonomy. Reassessing the Autonomy of the European Commission’, European Journal of Political Research, 47, 467–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trondal, J. (2010) An Emergent European Executive Order (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Trondal, J. (2011) ‘Transforming European Political Order. Executive Centre Formation and the European Commission’, Paper presented at Hertie School of Governance, Berlin, June 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trondal, J., van den Berg, C. and Suvarierol, S. (2008) ‘The Compound Machinery of Government. The Case of Seconded Officials in the European Commission’, Governance, 21, 253–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Zuzana Murdoch and Jarle Trondal

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Murdoch, Z., Trondal, J. (2015). The Temporary Commission Bureaucrat. In: Bauer, M.W., Trondal, J. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of the European Administrative System. European Administrative Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137339898_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics