Skip to main content

Introduction: Feeling the Return of Memory

  • Chapter
Performing Feeling in Cultures of Memory

Part of the book series: Palgrave Macmillan Memory Studies ((PMMS))

  • 220 Accesses

Abstract

When Polish artist Artur Żmijewski asked 92-year-old Józef Tarnawa, a former prisoner of the Auschwitz-Birkenau concentration camp, to ‘restore’ the camp number tattooed on his forearm, ómijewski’s film of the event, 80064, evoked an unsettling complicity in spectators. ómijewski has since explained that he aimed for a ‘film experiment with memory’, that ‘under the effect of the tattooing the “doors of memory” would open, that there would be an eruption of remembrance of that time, a stream of images or words describing the painful past’.1 Tarnawa, who initially agreed to the proposed ‘redoing’ of the wound, appears uncomfortably reluctant on screen. The reinscription is ‘not necessary’, he repeats, for ‘it won’t be the same number, it will be restored’. ómijewski persists and, by the close of the film, Tarnawa seems unconvincingly pleased with the updated version: ‘It looks nicer now, it’s more visible, more eye-catching & I have renovated it like some piece of furniture. ‘2 As Claire Bishop has remarked, ómijewski’s decided troubling of the traumatic wound addresses ‘ethics as an explicit theme’: it makes a point of our role in watching the wound become a site of repetition.3 As we watch, we are bystanders to ómijewski’s desire to incite a performance of memory, and while that performance misfires, we nonetheless become part of his anticipation that the ‘Real’ will erupt and touch us with its feeling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Claire Bishop, Artificial Hells: Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship (London: Verso, 2012), p. 353, 43n.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Elaine Scarry, The Body in Pain: The Making and Unmaking of the World (New York: Oxford University Press, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Emily Apter argues that affect ‘is what comes (quite logically) after the performative subject’, in Continental Drift: From National Characters to Virtual Subjects (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999), p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Vicki Kirby, Telling Flesh: The Substance of the Corporeal (New York: Routledge, 1997), p. 65.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Judith Butler, ‘Afterword: After Loss, What then?’ in David L. Eng and David Kazanjian (eds.) Loss: The Politics of Mourning (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003), pp. 467–73, p. 467.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Laurie Beth Clark, ‘Always Already Again: Trauma Tourism and the Politics of Memory Culture’, Encounters 1 (2010), pp. 65–74, p. 71.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Paul Connerton, The Spirit of Mourning: History, Memory and the Body (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), p. 133. Italics in original.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Rebecca Schneider, Performing Remains: Art and War in Times of Theatrical Reenactment (Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2011), pp. 1, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Judith Butler, Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence (London: Verso, 2004), p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lisa Saltzman, Making Memory Matter: Strategies of Remembrance in Contemporary Art (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Michael Hardt, ‘What Affects Are Good for’ in Patricia Ticineto Clough and Jean Halley (eds.) The Affective Turn: Theorizing the Social (Durham: Duke University Press, 2007), pp. ix–xiii, p. ix.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Patricia Ticineto Clough, ‘Introduction’ in Patricia Ticineto Clough and Jean Halley (eds.) The Affective Turn: Theorizing the Social (Durham: Duke University Press, 2007), pp. 1–33, p. 2.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Gregory J. Seigworth and Melissa Gregg, ‘An Inventory of Shimmers’ in Melissa Gregg and Gregory J. Seigworth (eds.) The Affect Theory Reader (Durham: Duke University Press, 2010), pp. 1–28, p. 13. Italics in original.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Brian Massumi, ‘The Future Birth of the Affective Fact: The Political Ontology of Threat’ in Melissa Gregg and Gregory J. Seigworth (eds.) The Affect Theory Reader (Durham: Duke University Press, 2010), pp. 52–70, p. 65. Italics in original.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Eric Shouse, ‘Feeling, Emotion, Affect’, M/C Journal 8.6 (2005), para. 15. http://www.journal.media-culture.org.au/0512/03-shouse.php, page accessed 10 September 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Teresa Brennan, The Transmission of Affect (Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 2004), p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  17. See Jan Assmann, ‘Collective Memory and Cultural Identity’, trans. John Czaplicka New German Critique 65 (1995), pp. 125–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Maurice Halbwachs On Collective Memory, trans. Lewis A. Coser (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992 [1941]).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Richard Crownshaw, The Afterlife of Holocaust Memory in Contemporary Literature and Culture (Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2010), p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wulf Kansteiner, ‘Finding Meaning in Memory: A Methodological Critique of Collective Memory Studies’, History and Theory 41 (May 2002), pp. 179–97, p. 182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Susannah Radstone and Katharine Hodgkin (eds.) argue that the study of what they term ‘regimes of memory’ opens out questions that foreground ‘not memory’s essence nor its ontology, but discursive productions of “memory” ‘, in Memory Cultures: Memory, Subjectivity and Recognition (New Brunswick: Transaction, 2009), p. 1. Italics in original.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Andreas Huyssen, Twilight Memories: Marking Time in a Culture of Amnesia (New York: Routledge, 1995), pp. 5, 9.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pierre Nora, ‘Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Mémoire’ trans. Marc Roudebush Representations 26 (Spring 1989), pp. 7–25, p. 7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Marianne Hirsch, ‘Surviving Images: Holocaust Photographs and the Work of Postmemory’, Yale Journal of Criticism 14.1 (2001), pp. 5–37, p. 9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Marianne Hirsch, Family Frames: Photography, Narrative and Postmemory (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1997), p. 245.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kaja Silverman, The Threshold of the Visible World (New York: Routledge, 1996), p. 189. I would like to thank Caroline Wake for directing me to this text.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Alison Landsberg, Prosthetic Memory: The Transformation of American Remembrance in the Age of Mass Culture (New York: Columbia University Press, 2004), p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lauren Berlant, ‘The Subject of True Feeling: Pain, Privacy, and Politics’ in Karyn Ball (ed.) Traumatizing Theory: The Cultural Politics of Affect in and Beyond Psychoanalysis (New York: Other Press, 2007), pp. 305–47, p. 309, p. 310.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Landsberg has been taken to task for her generality — what Crownshaw sees as the ‘universalisation of affect or assumption of trauma’ (The Afterlife, p. 24); and also for what James Berger describes as the literalisation of the term ‘prosthetic’. Berger writes: ‘Whatever it is we are experiencing or encountering in the events Landsberg describes, it is highly mediated...In a word, we encounter representations’. In ‘Which Prosthetic? Mass Media, Narrative, Empathy, and Progressive Politics’, Rethinking History 11.4 (2007), pp. 597–612, p. 604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Dora Apel, Memory Effects: The Holocaust and the Art of Secondary Witnessing (New Brunswick: Rutgers, 2002), pp. 12, 31.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Nicholas Ridout, Theatre & Ethics (Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009), p. 67.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Amanda Wise, ‘“It’s Just an Attitude that You Feel”: Inter-Ethnic Habitus Before the Cronulla Riots’ in Greg Noble (ed.) Lines in the Sand: The Cronulla Riots, Multiculturalism and National Belonging (Sydney: Federation Press, 2009), pp. 127–45, p. 132.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick, Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity (Durham: Duke University Press, 2003), p. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ben Highmore, ‘Bitter After Taste: Affect, Food, and Social Aesthetics’ in Melissa Gregg and Gregory J. Seigworth (eds.) The Affect Theory Reader (Durham: Duke University Press, 2010), pp. 118–37, p. 120.

    Google Scholar 

  35. John Sutton et al. note that while there is a disjunction between the humanities’ and scientific approaches to embodied cognition, their merging also raises problems, as it is ‘difficult for humanities scholars to find the right scientific and psychological theories on which to draw and with which to seek articulations’. It is, however, equally deceptive to think that ‘there are substantially unified visions of memory within either the sciences or the humanities’. See John Sutton, Celia B. Harris and Amanda J. Barnier, ‘Memory and Cognition’ in Susannah Radstone and Bill Schwarz (eds.) Memory: Histories, Theories, Debates (New York: Fordham University Press, 2010), pp. 209–26, p. 209. Italics in original.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Felicity Callard and Constantina Papoulias, ‘Affect and Embodiment’ in Susannah Radstone and Bill Schwarz (eds.) Memory: Histories, Theories, Debates (New York: Fordham University Press, 2010), pp. 246–62, p. 247.

    Google Scholar 

  37. As summarised by E.B. Titchener in ‘Affective Memory’, The Philosophical Review 4.1 (January 1895), pp. 65–76, p. 70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sutton et al., ‘Memory and Cognition’, p. 211. See also John Sutton, Celia B. Harris, Paul G. Keil and Amanda J. Barnier, ‘The Psychology of Memory, Extended Cognition, and Socially Distributed Remembering’, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 9.4 (2010), pp. 521–60.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Edward S. Casey, Remembering: A Phenomenological Study 2nd edition (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2000 [1987]), p. 167.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Casey, ‘Habitual Body and Memory in Merleau-Ponty’, Man and World 17 (1984), pp. 279–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Thomas J. Csordas, ‘Somatic Modes of Attention’, Cultural Anthropology 8.2 (1993), pp. 135–56, p. 138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. C. Nadia Seremetakis, ‘The Memory of the Senses, Part 1: Marks of the Transitory’ in C. Nadia Seremetakis (ed.) The Senses Still: Perception and Memory as Material Culture in Modernity (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994), pp. 1–18, p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Antonio R. Damasio, The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Conciousness (New York: Harcourt Brace and Co. 1999), p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Mary Helen Immordino-Yang and Antonio Damasio, ‘We Feel, Therefore We Learn: The Relevance of Affective and Social Neuroscience to Education’, Mind, Brain and Education 1.1 (2007), pp. 3–10, p. 8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 Bryoni Trezise

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Trezise, B. (2014). Introduction: Feeling the Return of Memory. In: Performing Feeling in Cultures of Memory. Palgrave Macmillan Memory Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137336224_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics