Abstract
There is always the temptation to build complex models, and that is why academics have a natural tendency to create long lists of strategy characteristics. However, following the wise principle of an English scientist living at the turn of the 13th and 14th centuries, philosopher and theologist William Ockham from the order of Minor Brothers, so-called Ockham razor, one can reduce the number of characteristics of a good strategy to three: simplicity, internal consistency and external coherence (see Figure 6.1). This doesn’t mean that every strategy with these factors guarantees an extraordinary company success, because anything can intervene — competitors, government, natural forces and bad luck. It is important, however, to notice that both theory and practice show that these are features that considerably increase the probability of success — both for creating an intellectual concept of strategy and its implementation in a concrete market reality. They are features of a good strategy and they simply mean that the company has developed and implemented a strategy, which maximizes its chances for success. They are also complementary, which means their importance and impact on the final success can be understood only through the interactions between them. Let’s start from looking at each of them separately.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
O. Solvell and M. E. Porter (2008) Finland and Nokia: Creating the World’s Most Competitive Economy, Harvard Business School case study 9-702-427; J. Roberts (2004) The Modern Firm, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 274–80
Y. Doz and M. Kosonen (2008) Fast Strategy: How Strategic Agility Will Help You Stay Ahead of the Game, Edinburgh: Pearson Education.
P. Drucker (1964) Managing for Results, New York: HarperCollins.
Roberts (2004) The Modern Firm, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 164–5.
T. Obloj and M. Sengul (2012) ‘Incentive Life Cycles: Learning and the Division of Value in Firms’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 57, 305–47.
J. R. Galbraith (2009) Designing Matrix Organizations That Actually Work, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
N. Siggielkow (2002) ‘Evolution toward Fit’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 125–59.
M. M. Andersen and F. Pulfelt (2006) Discount Business Strategy, New York: Wiley.
J. Pfferer (1997) The Human Equation, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
J. Roberts (2004) The Modern Firm, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
M. J. Siverstein and N. Friske (2003) Trading Up: The New American Luxury, New York: Penquin Group.
J. Rivkin and N. Siggelkow (2003) ‘Balancing Search and Stability: Interdependencies among Elements of Organizational Design’, Organization Science, 49, 290–311.
C. C. Markides and P. A. Geroski (2005) Fast Second, New York: Wiley, 1.
See http://www.atlas.com.pl/en/grupa/, accessed December 20, 2012.
J. Roberts (2004) The Modern Firm, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 48–9.
Copyright information
© 2013 Krzysztof Obloj
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Obloj, K. (2013). What Makes a Good Strategy?. In: The Passion and Discipline of Strategy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137334947_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137334947_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-46284-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-33494-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)