Abstract
It would hardly be worth a paper to demonstrate that many of the German-speaking intellectuals who fled to England and the United States carried an understanding of Max Weber with them into their new setting. The fact is too obvious. It is less obvious that the émigrés took several elements of Weber with them into their new setting, but were able to translate only some of these into the social-scientific vocabulary of their hosts. The most typical version of Weber that many of the émigrés embraced was his famous rationalisation and disenchantment thesis. This thesis was used largely to develop a cultural critique of modernity in the West in general and the United States in particular. A less typical but equally noteworthy version represented by a number of political economists sought to translate Weber’s emphasis on the institutional and cultural basis for economic conduct into a setting in which formal modelling was the dominant form of discourse. This mode of analysis found its expression in the works of economists such as Adolph Lowe (1987) at The New School, who examined the political backdrop for theories of the market and market intervention. However, there is a third version of Weber that also circulated among some émigrés and which, although of great significance for the study of politics, never quite flourished in its new setting, either in Britain or in the United States.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Aycoberry, Pierre (1981). The Nazi Question. New York: Random House.
Brecht, Arnold (1959). Political Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Buchstein, Hubertus (1992). Politikwissenschaft und Demokratie. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Coser, Lewis A. (1984). Refugee Scholars in America. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Gunnell, John G. (1993). The Descent of Political Theory: An American Vocation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hübinger, Gangolf, Jürgen Osterhammel, and Wolfgang Welz (1990). “Max Weber und die wissenschaftliche Politik nach 1945: Aspekte einer theoriegeschichtlichen Nicht-Rezeption.” Zeitschrift für Politik 37:2, 181–204.
Kelly, Duncan (2002). “Rethinking Franz Neumann’s Route to Behemoth.” History of Political Thought 23:3, 458–496.
Kettler, David and Volker Meja (1995). Karl Mannheim and the Crises of Liberalism. New Brunswick: Transaction.
Krohn, Claus-Dieter (1993). Intellectuals in Exile. Refugee Scholars and the New School for Social Research. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
Lederer, Emil (1940). The State of the Masses: The Threat of the Classless Society. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.
Lowe, Adolph (1987). Essays in Political Economics: Public Control in a Democratic Society. New York: New York University Press.
Mannheim, Karl (1936). Ideology and Utopia. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & World.
Mannheim, Karl (1940). Man and Society in an Age of Reconstruction. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & World.
Mannheim, Karl (1985). Ideologie und Utopie. Frankfurt: Vittoria Klostermann.
Mannheim, Karl (2001). Sociology as Political Education. New Brunswick: Transaction.
Morgenthau, Hans J. (1946). Scientific Man and Power Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Morgenthau, Hans J. (1948). Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: Knopf.
Neumann, Franz (1966). Behemoth. The Structure and Practice of National Socialism. New York: Harper & Row.
Neumann, Franz, Paul Tillich, Henri Peyre, Erwin Panofsky, and Wolfgang Köhler (1953). The Cultural Migration: The European Scholar in America. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Pichler, Hans-Karl (1998). “The Godfathers of ‘Truth’: Max Weber and Carl Schmitt in Morgenthau’s Theory of Power Politics.” Review of International Studies 24:2, 185–200.
Schmidt, Brian (1998). The Political Discourse of Anarchy. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Schoenbaum, David (1966). Hitler’s Social Revolution. Garden City: Doubleday & Co.
Söllner, Alfons (1979). Geschichte und Herrschaft: Studien zur materialistischen Sozialwissenschaft 1929–1942. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Söllner, Alfons (1987). “German Conservatism in America: Morgenthau’s Political Realism.” Telos 72, 161–172.
Söllner, Alfons (1996). “From Public Law to Political Science? The Emigration of German Scholars after 1933 and their Influence on the Transformation of a Discipline.” In Alfons Söllner and Mitchell G. Ash (eds.), Forced Migration and Scientific Change: Émigré German Speaking Scientists and Scholars after 1933. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tribe, Keith (1995). Strategies of Economic Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Walker, Thomas C. (1999). “Introduction: Morgenthau’s Dual Approach to International Politics.” International Studies Notes 24:1, 1–3.
Weber, Max (1946). Politics as a Vocation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Weber, Max (1972). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr [Paul Siebeck].
Weber, Max (1982). Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr [Paul Siebeck].
Weber, Max (1994). Political Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Peter Breiner
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Breiner, P. (2014). Translating Max Weber: Exile Attempts to Forge a New Political Science. In: Rösch, F. (eds) Émigré Scholars and the Genesis of International Relations. Palgrave Studies in International Relations Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137334695_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137334695_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-46279-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-33469-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Intern. Relations & Development CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)