Skip to main content

Introduction

Breaking the Silence: European Émigré Scholars and the Genesis of an American Discipline

  • Chapter
Émigré Scholars and the Genesis of International Relations

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in International Relations Series ((PSIR))

  • 132 Accesses

Abstract

Émigré Scholars and the Genesis of American International Relations: A European Discipline in America? invites students of International Relations (IR) to return to the discipline’s modern foundation during the early and mid-twentieth century and to reconsider the contribution of Continental European émigré scholars. Its intention is to break the silence that has befallen émigré scholarship in Anglophone IR, since the dominance of American positivism (Maliniak 2011: 439) has been challenged by various forms of critical scholarship. Generally, these challenges do not consider the Continental European context in which many of the early IR scholars were socialised. In reconsidering the lives and thoughts of émigré scholars, IR students will find three aspects particularly beneficial: they are encouraged to question the usual trajectories of IR as an American discipline, to reflect upon émigré scholars’ thought as an enrichment of world political theorising in the twenty-first century, and to enhance discussions of intercultural knowledge exchange by moving beyond conceptualisations of imposition towards amalgamation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Arendt, Hannah (1978). “We Refugees.” In Ron H. Feldman (ed.), Hannah Arendt. The Jew as Pariah. Jewish Identity and Politics in the Modern Age. New York: Grove.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, Lucian M. (2009). “Interdisciplinarity and International Relations.” European Political Science 8:1, 16–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, Lucian M. (2013). “Mapping a New World: Geography and the Interwar Study of International Relations.” International Studies Quarterly 57:1, 138–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bain, William (2000). “Deconfusing Morgenthau: Moral Inquiry and Classical Realism Reconsidered.” Review of International Studies 26:3, 445–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barboza, Amalia and Christoph Henning (eds.) (2006). Deutsch-Jüdische Wissenschaftsschicksale. Studien über Identitätskonstruktionen in der Sozialwissenschaft. Bielefeld: Transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behr, Hartmut (2010). A History of International Political Theory: Ontologies of the International. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behr, Hartmut (2014). Politics of Difference: A Phenomenological Approach to Peace. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behr, Hartmut and Amelia Heath (2009). “Misreading in IR Theory and Ideology Critique: Morgenthau, Waltz, and Neo-Realism.” Review of International Studies 35:2, 327–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behr, Hartmut and Felix Rösch (2012). “Introduction.” In Hans J. Morgenthau (ed.), The Concept of the Political. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendix, Reinhard (1986). From Berlin to Berkeley: German-Jewish Identities. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilgin, Pinar (2008). “Thinking Past ‘Western’ IR?” Third World Quarterly 29:1, 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleek, Wilhelm (2001). Geschichte der Politikwissenschaft in Deutschland. Munich: C.H. Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleiker, Roland and Emma Hutchison (2008). “Fear No More: Emotions and World Politics.” Review of International Studies 34:S1, 115–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brecht, Arnold (1966). Aus nächster Nähe: Lebenserinnerungen. Stuttgart: DVA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coser, Lewis A. (1984). Refugee Scholars in America. Their Impact and their Experiences. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, Wayne S. and Kim Richard Nossal (2009). “The ‘Crimson World’: The Anglo Core, the Post-Imperial Non-Core, and the Hegemony of American IR.” In Arlene B. Tickner and Ole Waever (eds.), International Relations Scholarship around the World. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, Robert M. A. and Darryl S. L. Jarvis (eds.) (2001). International Relations. Still an American Social Science? Toward Diversity in International Thought.New York: Suny Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, Catherine (1991). “Schicksalsgeschichte: Refugee Historians in the United States.” In Hartmut Lehmann and James J. Sheehan (eds.), An Interrupted Past: German-Speaking Refugee Historians in the United States after 1933. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fair-Schulz, Axel and Mario Kessler (eds.) (2011). German Scholars in Exile: New Studies in Intellectual History. Lanham: Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frei, Christoph (2001). Hans J. Morgenthau. An Intellectual Biography. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrichs, Jörg (2004). European Approaches to International Relations Theory. A House with Many Mansions. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetschel, Willi (2011). “Voices from the ‘Jewish Colony’: Sovereignty, Power, Secularization, and the Outside Within.” In Robbie Shilliam (ed.), Non-Western Thought and International Relations: Retrieving the Global Context of Investigations of Modernity. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilhot, Nicolas (2008). “The Realist Gambit: Postwar American Political Science and the Birth of IR Theory.” International Political Sociology 2:4, 281–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilhot, Nicolas (ed.) (2011). The Invention of International Relations Theory: Realism, the Rockefeller Foundation and the 1954 Conference on Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halperin, Sandra (2006). “International Relations Theory and Western Conceptions of Modernity.” In B. Gruffydd Jones (ed.), Decolonising International Relations. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herz, John H. (1984). Vom Überleben: Wie ein Weltbild entstand. Düsseldorf: Droste.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, John M. (2012). The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics: Western International Theory, 1760–2010. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, Stanley (1977). “An American Social Science: International Relations.” Daedalus 106, 41–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen, Knud Erik (2000). “Continental IR Theory: The Best Kept Secret.” European Journal of International Relations 6:1, 9–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen, Knud Erik and Tonny Brems Knudsen (eds.) (2006). International Relations in Europe: Traditions, Perspectives and Destinations. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jütersonke, Oliver (2010). Morgenthau, Law and Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kahler, Miles (1993). “International Relations: An American Social Science or an International One?” In Linda B. Miller and Michael Smith (eds.), Ideas and Ideals: Essays on Politics in Honor of Stanley Hoffmann. Boulder: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahler, Miles (1997). “Inventing International Relations: International Relations Theory after 1945.” In Michael W. Doyle and G. John Ikenberry (eds.), New Thinking in International Relations Theory. Boulder: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayaoglu, Turan (2010). “Westphalian Eurocentrism in International Relations Theory.” International Studies Review 12:2, 193–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kettler, David (2011). The Liquidation of Exile: Studies in the Intellectual Emigration of the 1930s. London: Anthem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kettler, David and Thomas Wheatland (2004). “Contested Legacies: Political Theory and the Hitler Era.” European Journal of Political Theory 3:2, 117–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kettler, David and Gerhard Lauer (eds.) (2005). Exile, Science, and Bildung. The Contested Legacies of German Émigré Intellectuals. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kielmannsegg, Peter Graf, Mewes, Horst, and Elisabeth Glaser-Schmidt (eds.) (1995). Hannah Arendt and Leo Strauss: German Émigrés and American Political Thought after World War II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinschmidt, Harald (2000). The Nemesis of Power: A History of International Relations Theories. London: Reaktion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, Ekkehart (1989). “The Dominance of American Approaches in International Relations.” In Hugh C. Dyer and Leon Mangasarian (eds.), The Study of International Relations: The State of the Art. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen, Peter (2013). “Revisiting the ‘American Social Science’: Mapping the Geography of International Relations.” International Studies Perspectives,DOI: 10.1111/insp.12061.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krohn, Claus-Dieter (1993). Intellectuals in Exile. Refugee Scholars and the New School for Social Research. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, Anthony F. Jr and John Williams (eds.) (2005). Hannah Arendt and International Relations: Readings across the Lines. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, Markus (2012). “Vom Political Scholar zum Global Citizen? Perspektiven der Emigrationsforschung.” In Frank Schale, Ellen Thümmler, and Michael Vollmer (eds.), Intellektuelle Emigration: Zur Aktualität eines historischen Phänomens. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebow, Richard Ned (2003). The Tragic Vision of Politics: Ethics, Interests, and Orders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, Daniel J. (2012). Recovering International Relations: The Promise of Sustainable Critique. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maliniak, Daniel, Amy Oakes, Susan Peterson, and Michael J. Tierney (2011). “International Relations in the US Academy.” International Studies Quarterly 55:2, 437–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molloy, Sean (2006). The Hidden History of Realism: A Genealogy of Power Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Molloy, Sean (2013). “Spinoza, Carr, and the Ethics of The Twenty Years’ Crisis.” Review of International Studies 39:2, 251–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgenthau, Hans J. (1984). “Fragment of an Intellectual Autobiography: 1904–1932.” In Kenneth W. Thompson and Robert J. Myers (eds.), Truth and Tragedy. A Tribute to Hans J. Morgenthau. New Brunswick: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, Franz L., Paul Tillich, Henri Peyre, Erwin Panofsky, and Wolfgang Köhler (1953). The Cultural Migration: The European Scholar in America. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oz, Amos and Fania Oz-Salzberger (2012). Jews and Words. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, Norman D. (1980). “The Study of International Relations in the United States.” International Studies Quarterly 24:3, 343–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puglierin, Jana (2011). John H. Herz: Leben und Denken zwischen Idealismus und Realismus, Deutschland und Amerika. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, Jenny (2003). “Postcolonialising Geography: Tactics and Pitfalls.” Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 24:3, 273–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rösch, Felix (2013). “The Human Condition of Politics: Considering the Legacy of Hans J. Morgenthau for International Relations.” Journal of International Political Theory 9:1, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rösch, Felix (2014). “Pouvoir, Puissance, and Politics: Hans Morgenthau’s Dualistic Concept of Power?” Review of International Studies 40:2, 349–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, Andrew A. G. (2013). “Realism, Emotion, and Dynamic Allegiances in Global Politics.” International Theory 5:2, 273–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Said, Edward (2001). Reflections on Exile: And Other Literary and Cultural Essays. London: Granta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandal, Nukhet and Jonathan Fox (2013). Religion in International Relations Theory: Interactions and Possibilities. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schale, Frank, Thümmler, Ellen, and Michael Vollmer (eds.) (2012). Intellektuelle Emigration: Zur Aktualität eines historischen Phänomens. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheuerman, William E. (2009). Hans Morgenthau: Realism and Beyond. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheuerman, William E. (2011). The Realist Case for Global Reform. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuett, Robert (2007). “Freudian Roots of Political Realism: The Importance of Sigmund Freud to Hans J. Morgenthau’s Theory of International Power Politics.” History of the Human Sciences 20:4, 53–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Steve (2000). “The Discipline of International Relations: Still an American Social Science?” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 2:3, 374–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Steve (2002). “The United States and the Discipline of International Relations: Hegemonic Country, Hegemonic Discipline?” International Studies Perspectives 4:2, 67–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Söllner, Alfons (1987). “German Conservatism in America: Morgenthau’s Political Realism.” Telos 72, 161–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Söllner, Alfons (1996a). Deutsche Politikwissenschaftler in der Emigration: Studien zu ihrer Akkulturation und Wirkungsgeschichte. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Söllner, Alfons (1996b). “From Public Law to Political Science? The Emigration of German Scholars after 1933 and their Influence on the Transformation of a Discipline.” In Alfons Söllner and Mitchell G. Ash (eds.), Forced Migration and Scientific Change: Émigré German Speaking Scientists and Scholars after 1933. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Söllner, Alfons and Mitchell G. Ash (1996). “Introduction: Forced Migration and Scientific Change after 1933.” In Alfons Söllner and Mitchell G. Ash (eds.), Forced Migration and Scientific Change: Émigré German Speaking Scientists and Scholars after 1933. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, Ty (2012). “Human Nature and the Limits of the Self: Hans Morgenthau on Love and Power.” International Studies Review 14:2, 201–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srubar, Ilja (ed.) (1988). Exil, Wissenschaft, Identität: Emigration deutscher Sozialwissenschaftler 1933–1945. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele, Brent J. (2013). “Context and Appropriation: The Risks, Benefits and Challenges of Reinterpretive Expression.” International Politics 50:6, 739–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, Herbert A. (1991). “Jewish Emigration in the Nazi Period: Some Aspects of Acculturation.” In Werner Eugen Mosse (ed.), Second Chance: Two Centuries of German-speaking Jews in the United Kingdom. Tübingen: Mohr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, Herbert A., Hans-Peter Kröner, Alfons Söllner, and Klaus Fischer (1988). “Wissenschaftstransfer durch Emigration nach 1933.” Historical Social Research 13:1, 111–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suganami, Hidemi (1983). “The Structure of Institutionalism: An Anatomy of British Mainstream International Relations.” International Relations 7:5, 2362–2381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thümmler, Ellen (2011). Katholischer Publizist und amerikanischer Politikwissenschaftler: eine intellektuelle Biografie Waldemar Gurians. BadenBaden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjalve, Vibeke Schou (2008). Realist Strategies of Republican Peace: Niebuhr, Morgenthau, and the Politics of Patriotic Dissent. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Troy, Jodok (ed.) (2013). Religion and the Realist Tradition. From Political Theology to International Relations Theory and Back. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasilaki, Rosa (2012). “Provincialising IR? Deadlocks and Prospects in Post-Western IR Theory.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 41:1, 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vecchiarelli Scott, Joanna (2004). “Alien Nation: Hannah Arendt, the German Émigrés and America.” European Journal of Political Theory 3:2, 167–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waever, Ole (1998). “The Sociology of a not so International Discipline: American and European Developments in International Relations.” International Organization 52:4, 687–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Michael C. (2005). The Realist Tradition and the Limits of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Michael C. (ed.) (2007). Realism Reconsidered: The Legacy of Hans Morgenthau in International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young-Bruehl, Elisabeth (1982). Hannah Arendt: For Love of the World. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Felix Rösch

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rösch, F. (2014). Introduction. In: Rösch, F. (eds) Émigré Scholars and the Genesis of International Relations. Palgrave Studies in International Relations Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137334695_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics