Advertisement

Governance Efforts to Prevent Weapons Trafficking

  • Simone Wisotzki
Part of the Governance and Limited Statehood book series (GLS)

Abstract

In the 2005 motion picture Lord of War, Nicholas Cage plays the role of an unscrupulous arms broker who at one instance remarks: ‘If I do my job right, an arms embargo should be practically impossible to enforce’. This rather cynical but convincing statement impressively illustrates the growing problem of the illicit trafficking of Small Arms and Light Weapons (SALW) which provides a considerable challenge for governance efforts taken at global, regional, subregional, national, and local levels.1 These weapons are easy to hide and to transport, and the illegal arms trade is often connected with other forms of organized crime, such as the diamond trade or drug trafficking (see Jakobi, Chapter 5, this volume). In addition, the supply routes for arms are both plentiful and complex structures which pose significant challenges to any governmental efforts to prevent trafficking. SALW control efforts are further inhibited by structural causes on the demand side: Fragile statehood, economic underdevelopment, intrastate conflicts, terrorism, and transnational organized crime provide the international community of states with additional challenges.

Keywords

United Nations Organize Crime Human Security Governance Effort Transnational Organize Crime 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. K.W. Abbott and D. Snidal (2000) ‘Hard and Soft Law in International Governance’, International Organization, 54(3), 421–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. K.W. Abbott, R.O. Keohane, A. Moravcsik, A.-M. Slaughter and D. Snidal (2000) ‘The Concept of Legalization’, International Organization, 54(3), 401–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. A. Björkdahl (2002) ‘Norms in International Relations: Some Conceptual and Methodological Reflections’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 15(1), 9–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. D. Byman and S. Van Evera (1998) ‘Why They Fight: Hypotheses on the Causes of Contemporary Deadly Conflict’, Security Studies, 7(3), 381–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. A.F. Cooper (2002) ‘Like-Minded Nations, NGOs, and the Changing Pattern of Diplomacy within the UN System: An Introductory Perspective’, in A.F. Cooper, J. English, and R. Thakur (eds) Enhancing Global Governance: Towards a New Diplomacy? (Tokyo: United Nations University Press), pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
  6. N. Deitelhoff and S. Wisotzki (2004) ‘The Power of Persuasion. New Diplomacy in Multilateral Negotiations’, Conference Paper for the Millennium Annual Conference ‘Facets of Power in International Relations’, London, 30–31 October 2004.Google Scholar
  7. N. Florquin and E. Berman (2005) Armed and Aimless: Armed Groups, Guns, and Human Security in the ECOWAS Region (Geneva: Small Arms Survey).Google Scholar
  8. D. Garcia (2006) Small Arms and Security. New Emerging International Norms (London/New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
  9. L.C. Green (2000) The Contemporary Law of Armed Conflict, 2nd edition (Manchester: Manchester University Press).Google Scholar
  10. IANSA (2006) Position Paper for the PrepCom for the United Nations Conference to Review Progress Made in the Implementation of the Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects, www.iansa.org/position_paper2006.html (online available), last access 5 October 2009.
  11. R.C. Johansen (2000) ‘Enforcing Norms and Normalizing Enforcement for Humane Governance’, in P. Wapner and L.E.J. Ruiz (eds) Principled World Politics. The Challenge of Normative International Relations (Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield), pp. 209–30.Google Scholar
  12. C. Jojarth (2009) Crime, War, and Global Trafficking. Designing International Cooperation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  13. S. Khagram, J.V. Riker and K. Sikkink (eds) (2002) Restructuring World Politics. Transnational Social Movements, Networks and Norms (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press).Google Scholar
  14. E. Krahmann (2010) States, Citizens and the Privatisation of Security (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. E.J. Laurance (1998) Light Weapons and Intrastate Conflict: Early Warning Factors and Preventative Action (New York: Carnegie Corporation).Google Scholar
  16. E. Newman (2004) ‘“The New Wars” Debate’, Security Dialogue, 35(2), 173–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. C. Nordstrom (2007) Global Outlaws. Crime, Money, and Power in the Contemporary World (Berkley: University of California Press).Google Scholar
  18. S. Parker (2011) National Implementation of the United Nations Small Arms Programme of Action and the International Tracing Instrument: An Analysis of Reporting in 2009–10 (Geneva: Small Arms Survey).Google Scholar
  19. R.A. Payne (2001) ‘Persuasion, Frames and Norm Construction’, European Journal of International Relations, 7(1), 37–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. R. Price (1998) ‘Reversing the Gun Sights: Transnational Civil Society Targets Land Mines’, International Organization, 52(3), 613–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. K. Rutherford, S. Brem and R.A. Matthew (eds) (2003) Reframing the Agenda: The Impact of NGO and Middle Power Cooperation in International Security Policy (Westport: Praeger).Google Scholar
  22. K. Rutherford (2009) ‘The Anti-Personnel Landmine Ban Convention’, in S. Brem and K. Stiles (eds) Co-Operating without America: Theories and Case-Studies of Non-Hegemonic Regimes (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  23. T.M. Shaw, S.J. MacLean and D.R. Black (2006) ‘Introduction: A Decade of Human Security: What Prospects for Global Governance and New Multilateralism?’, in S.J. MacLean, D.R. Black and T.M. Shaw (eds) A Decade of Human Security. Global Governance and New Multilateralism (Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited), pp. 3–18.Google Scholar
  24. Small Arms Survey (2003a) Moving From Words to Action. Small Arms Norms (Geneva: Small Arms Survey), pp. 215–53.Google Scholar
  25. Small Arms Survey (2003b) Insights and Mysteries: Global Small Arms Transfers (Geneva: Small Arms Survey), pp. 97–120.Google Scholar
  26. Small Arms Survey (2005) Reaching for the Big Picture: An Update on Small Arms Transfers (Geneva: Small Arms Survey), pp. 97–116.Google Scholar
  27. Small Arms Survey (2009) Two Steps Forward: UN Measure Update (Geneva: Small Arms Survey), pp. 134–57.Google Scholar
  28. Small Arms Survey (2010) Options for Engagement. Armed Groups and Humanitarian Norms (Geneva: Small Arms Survey), pp. 305–33.Google Scholar
  29. Spiegel (2011), Deutsche Waffen in Libyen. Staatsanwaltschaft ermittelt gegen Heckler & Koch’, http://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/deutsche-waffen-in-libyen-staatsanwalt-ermittelt-gegen-heckler-koch-a-793431.html (online available), last access 22 March 2012.
  30. S. Tadjbakhsh and A.M. Chenoy (2007) Human Security. Concepts and Implications (Abingdon: Routledge).Google Scholar
  31. United Nations (2001) ‘United Nations Program of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects’, UN Document A/CONF.192/15, http://www.poa-iss.org/PoA/poahtml.aspx (online available).
  32. UNODC (2000) ‘Protocol Against the Illicit Manufacturing and Trafficking in Firearms, Their Parts and Components and Ammunition, Supplementing the United Nations Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime’, http://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/treaties/CTOC/index.html#Fulltext (online available), last access 22 March 2012.
  33. UNODC (2008) ‘Implementation of the Protocol Against the Illicit Man-ufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Their Parts and Components and Ammunition, Supplementing the United Nations Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime: Consolidated Information Received from States’, http://www.unodc.org/documents/treaties/COP2008/ CTOC%20COP%202006-8-Rev-1%20Final%20E.pdf (online available), last access 22 March 2012.
  34. UNODC (2010) ‘Status of Ratification of the United Nations Convention Against Transnational Crime and the Protocols’, http://www.unodc.org/documents/treaties/organized_crime/COP5/CTOC_COP_2010_CRP4/CTOC_COP_2010_CRP4_E.pdf (online available), last access 22 March 2012.
  35. D. Volman (1998) ‘The Militarization of Africa’, in M. Turshen and C. Twagiramariya (eds) What Women Do in Wartime. Gender and Conflict in Africa (London: Zed Books), pp. 150–62.Google Scholar
  36. S. Wisotzki (2009a) ‘Negotiating human security at the UN: Transnational Civil Society, Arms Control and Disarmament’, in J. Joachim and B. Locher (eds) Transnational Activism in the UN and the EU. A Comparative Study (London/New York: Taylor & Francis), pp. 76–90.Google Scholar
  37. S. Wisotzki (2009b) Between Morality and Military Interests: Norm Setting in Human-itarian Arms Control, PRIF Report No. 92/2009 (Frankfurt: PRIF).Google Scholar
  38. K.D. Wolf (2010) Output, Outcome, Impact: Focusing the Analytical Lens for Evaluating the Success of Corporate Contributions to Peace-Building and Conflict Prevention, PRIF Working Paper 3 (Frankfurt: PRIF).Google Scholar
  39. Z. Yihdego (2007) The Arms Trade and International Law (Oxford/Portland: Hart).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Simone Wisotzki 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simone Wisotzki

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations