Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Governance and Limited Statehood ((GLS))

  • 462 Accesses

Abstract

The involvement of non-state actors in the governance of violence and crime raises new problems as well as new solutions and opportunities. When actors outside the control of states are engaged in the governance of public goods and values, dilemmas of democratic accountability, integrity, and transparency are likely to occur (cf. Behn 2001). These are all important problems that are addressed in the chapters of this volume. In this chapter, I will contribute to the overall theme of the book by providing an analysis of some of the dilemmas encountered by private business actors engaged in the governance of violence and crime. The purpose of the chapter is thus to emphasize the role of private business actors and to elaborate on problems that they encounter as participants in the governance of crime. What dilemmas do they grapple with? How are these dilemmas managed or resolved?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • V.E. Baier, J.G. March and H. Saetren (1986) ‘Implementation and Ambiguity’, Scandinavian Journal of Management Studies, 2(3-4), 197–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Behn (2001) Rethinking Democratic Accountability (Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Bergström, K. Svedberg Helgesson and U. Mörth (2011) ‘A New Role for For-Profit Actors? The Case of Anti-Money Laundering and Risk Management’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 49(5), 1043–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Bexell and U. Mörth (eds) (2010) Democracy and Public-Private Partnerships in Global Governance (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • J.J. Boddewyn (1985) ‘Advertising Self-Regulation. Private Government and Agent of Public Policy’, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 4, 4–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Braithwaite and P. Drahos (2000) Global Business Regulation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • A.I. Canhoto and J. Backhouse (2007) ‘Profiling Under Conditions of Ambiguity. An Application in the Financial Services Industry’, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 14, 14–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Child and S.B. Rodrigues (2003) ‘Corporate Governance and New Organizational Forms: Issues of Double and Multiple Agency’, Journal of Management and Governance, 7, 7–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. de Goede (2008) ‘Risk, Preemption and Exception in the War on Terrorist Financing’ in L. Amoore and M. de Goede (eds) Risk and the War on Terror (London: Routledge), pp. 97–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • DI (Dagens Industri) (2009) ‘Öhmans kunder kartläggs i detalj’, 6 October 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on the Prevention of the Use of the Financial System for the Purpose of Money Laundering and Terrorism Financing.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Dingwerth (2007) The New Transnationalism: Transnational Governance and Democratic Legitimacy (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • M.-L. Djelic and K. Sahlin-Andersson (eds) (2006) Transnational Governance. Institutional Dynamics ofRegulation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • R.V. Ericson (2006) ‘Ten Uncertainties of Risk-Management Approaches to Security’, Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale, 48(3), 345–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Favarel-Garrigues, T. Godefroy and P. Lascoumes (2008) ‘Sentinels in the Banking Industry: Private Actors and the Fight Against Money Laundering in France’, British Journal of Criminology, 48, 48–1.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Favarel-Garrigues, T. Godefroy and P. Lascoumes (2009) Les sentinelles de l’argent sale au quotidien — Les Banques aux prises avec l’antiblanchiment (Paris: La Découverte).

    Google Scholar 

  • FATF (2012) FATF International Standards on Combating Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism & Proliferation. The FATF Recommendations (Paris: FATF/OECD).

    Google Scholar 

  • Finansförbundet/Finansvärlden (2008) ‘Tema penningtvätt. Misstänkt penningtvätt skapar stort obehag’, 13 October 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Geiger and O. Wuensch (2007) ‘An Economic Analysis of a Cost-Benefit Paradoxon’, Journal of Money Laundering Control, 10(1), 91–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K.D. Haggerty and R.V. Ericson (2006) ‘The New Politics of Surveillance’ in K.D. Haggerty and R.V. Ericson (eds) The New Politics of Surveillance and Visibility (Toronto: University of Toronto Press), pp. 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Hallenberg (2012) ‘Anti-Money Laundering in the United States’ in K. Svedberg Helgesson and U. Mörth (eds) Securitization, Accountability and Risk Management — Transforming the Public Security Domain (London: Routledge), pp. 56–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Hood, H. Rothstein and R. Baldwin (2001) The Government of Risk. Understand-ing Risk Regulation Regimes (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • R. Hülsse (2007) ‘Creating Demand for Global Governance: The Making of a Global Money-Laundering Problem’, Global Society, 21, 21–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A.P. Jakobi (2010) ‘OECD Activities Against Money Laundering and Corruption’ in K. Martens and A.P. Jakobi (eds) Mechanisms of OECD Governance. International Incentives for National Policy-Making? (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 139–62.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • R. King (2007) The Regulatory State in an Age of Governance (London: Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • M. Levi (2010) ‘Combating the Financing of Terrorism. A History and Assessment of the Control of Threat Finance’, British Journal of Criminology, 50, 50–650.

    Google Scholar 

  • M.H. Lubatkin, P.J. Lane, S.-O. Collin and P. Very (2005) ‘Origins of Corpo-rate Governance in the USA, Sweden and France’, Organization Studies, 26(6), 867–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. McBarnet (2004) Crime, Compliance and Control (Aldershot: Ashgate).

    Google Scholar 

  • D. McBarnet and C. Wheelan (1999) Creative Accounting and the Cross-eyed Javelin Thrower (Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd).

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Mitchell, P. Sikka and H. Willmott (1998) ‘Sweeping it Under the Carpet: The Role of Accountancy Firms in Money-Laundering’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23(5/6), 589–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U. Mörth (ed.) (2004) Soft Law in Governance and Regulation (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Power (2004) The Risk Management of Everything: Rethinking the Politics of Uncertainty (London: Demos).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Power (2007) Organized Uncertainty: Designing a World of Risk Management (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Roberts (2005) ‘Agency Theory, Ethics and Corporate Governance’, Advances in Public Interest Accounting, 11, 11–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Ross and M. Hannan (2007) ‘Money Laundering and Risk-Based Decision-Making’, Journal of Money Laundering Control, 10, 10–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. Sahlin-Andersson (1996) ‘Imitating by Editing Success. The Construction of Organizational Fields’ in B. Czarniawska and G. Sevón (eds) Translating Organizational Change (Berlin: de Gruyter), pp. 69–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Sahlin and L. Wedlin (2008) ‘Circulating Ideas: Imitation, Translation and Editing’ in R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin and R. Suddaby (eds) The Sage Handbook on Organizational Institutionalism (London: Sage), pp. 218–42.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • W.R. Scott (1987) ‘The Adolescence of Institutional theory’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 32–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A.G. Scherer and G. Palazzo (2011) ‘The New Political Role of Business in a Globalized World — A Review of a New Perspective on CSR and its Implications for the Firm, Governance, and Democracy’, Journal of Management Studies, 48, 48–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T. Shearer (2002) ‘Ethics and Accountability: From the For-Itself to the For-the-Other’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27, 27–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SFS (2009) ‘Lag om Ã¥tgärder mot penningtvätt och finansiering av terrorism’ (Law on Measures Against Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism, Swedish Government.), no. 62.

    Google Scholar 

  • SOU (2012) ‘Penningtvätt. Kriminalisering, förverkande och dispositionsförbud. Betänkande av 2010 Ã¥rs penningtvättsutredning’ (Report of the parliamentary committee on money laundering, Swedish Department of Justice.), no. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Svedberg Helgesson (2010) ‘Partnerships, Boundary Blurring and Accountable Actorhood’ in M. Bexell and U. Mörth (eds) Democracy and Public-Private Partnerships in Global Governance (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 24–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Svedberg Helgesson (2012) ‘The Multiple Positions of Private Actors in Securitization’ in K. Svedberg Helgesson and U. Mörth (eds) Securitization, Accountability and Risk Management — Transforming the Public Security Domain (London: Routledge), pp. 132–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Svedberg Helgesson and U. Mörth (eds) (2012) Securitization, Accountability and Risk Management — Transforming the Public Security Domain (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Svedberg Helgesson and U. Mörth (eds) (2013) The Political Role of Corporate Citizens. An Interdisciplinary Approach (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Unger and F. van Waarden (2009) ‘How to Dodge Drowning in Data. Rule — and Risk-Based Anti Money Laundering Policies Compared’, Review of Law and Economics, 5(2), 953–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Verhage (2009) ‘Supply and Demand: Anti-Money Laundering by the Compliance Industry’, Journal of Money Laundering Control, 14(4), 371–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. Wittgenstein (1953) Philosophical Investigations, Translated by G.E.M. Anscombe (Oxford: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • K.D. Wolf, A. Flohr, L. Rieth and S. Schwindenhammer (eds) (2010) The Role of Business in Global Governance. Corporations as Norm — Entrepreneurs (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Zedner (2006) ‘Liquid security: Managing the Market for Crime Control’, Criminology and Criminal Justice, 6(3), 267–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Karin Svedberg Helgesson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Helgesson, K.S. (2013). Banks and the Governance of Crime. In: Jakobi, A.P., Wolf, K.D. (eds) The Transnational Governance of Violence and Crime. Governance and Limited Statehood. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137334428_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics