Advertisement

The Shunzhi Emperor, 1651–1661

  • Harry Miller

Abstract

Grieving officials lined the road by which Dorgon’s body was returned to Beijing on January 8, 1651. The Shunzhi emperor was not yet 13 years old, but there would be no second regency. As early as January 17, the young monarch ordered that “all the business of the country’s governance be referred via memorial to Us,” and some weeks later, on March 12, he undercut the whole notion of princely rule by anathematizing Dorgon posthumously and indicting a few other Manchu aristocrats for, among other things, hijacking imperial communications and ruling in the shadow of the throne. The pendulum of political fortune, swinging violently since the late Ming, thus continued to operate in the early Qing. Yet this 1651 oscillation, which seemed to be in intra-Manchu politics a shift toward direct imperial control, would prove in the Chinese context to be a confused lurch in the other direction, toward some form of gentlemanly rule. The sword of power that Shunzhi grasped so impatiently turned out to be double edged, and neither he nor the gentry-officials who also aspired to it were ever fully able to wield it effectively. Shunzhi’s reign would end in considerable disappointment and frustration.1

Keywords

Ming Dynasty Corrupt Official Early Qing Dynasty Civil Service Examination County Magistrate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    Da Qing Shizong Zhang (Shunzhi) huangdi shilu, ch. 51, 11a, ch. 54, 12a-13b, reprinted in Da Qing Shizong Zhang (Shunzhi) huangdi shilu, vol. 2, 596, 632–33; Frederic Wakeman Jr., The Great Enterprise: The Manchu Reconstruction of Imperial Order in Seventeenth-Century China (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985), 905–6.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    Tu Lien-che, “Wu Wei-yeh,” in Eminent Chinese of the Ch’ing Period, ed. Arthur Hummel (Taipei: Ch’eng wen, 1972), 883;Google Scholar
  3. Zhang Huijian, Ming Qing Jiangsu wenren nianbiao (Shanghai: Shanghai guji chuban-she, 1986), 602, 627, 635–36;Google Scholar
  4. Shen Yun, Sheng hu za lu (Mr. Shen of Jiaxing: 1918), 12b.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    William S. Atwell, “From Education to Politics: The Fu She,” in The Unfolding of Neo-Confucianism, ed. William Theodore de Bary et al. (New York: Columbia University Press, 1975), 349–50;Google Scholar
  6. Jerry Dennerline, The Chia-ting Loyalists: Confucian Leadership and Social Change in Seventeenth-Century China (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1981), 16–23, 30–39;Google Scholar
  7. Lu Shiyi, “Fu She ji lue,” in Donglin shimo, ed. Wu Yingji et al. (Taipei: Guangwen shu ju, 1977), 207–8;Google Scholar
  8. Xie Guozhen, Ming-Qing zhi ji dang-she yundong kao (Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 1982), 136;Google Scholar
  9. He Zongmei, Ming mo Qing chu wenren jieshe yanjiu (Tianjin: Nankai daxue chubanshe, 2004), 155–56;Google Scholar
  10. Harry Miller, State versus Gentry in Late Ming Dynasty China, 1572–1644 (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009), 106–11, 140–41.Google Scholar
  11. 6.
    Wei Qingyuan, Zhang Juzheng he Mingdai zhonghouqi zhengju (Guangzhou: Gaodeng jiaoyu chubanshe, 1999), 8–12, 269–80;Google Scholar
  12. John Meskill, Gentlemanly Interests and Wealth on the Tangtze Delta (Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Asian Studies, 1994), 132–33;Google Scholar
  13. Willard Peterson, “Confucian Learning in Late Ming Thought,” in The Cambridge History of China, ed. Denis Twitchett and Frederick W. Mote, vol. 8 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), 730–31;Google Scholar
  14. Gu Xiancheng, “Jian Wu Cheru guanglu,” in Jinggao cang gao, ch. 5, 18b-19a, reprinted in Siku quanshu, vol. 1292 (Taipei: Taiwan Commercial Press, 1986), 64;Google Scholar
  15. Wu Weiye, “Fu she ji lue,” in Donglin shi mo, ed. Wu Yingji et al. (Taipei: Guangwen shuju, 1977), 158.Google Scholar
  16. 8.
    Zhang Huijian, Ming Qing Jiangsu wenren nianbiao, 636, 639–41; Feng Qiyong and Ye Junyuan, comps., Wu Meicun nianpu (Beijing: Wenhua yishu chubanshe, 2007), 182, 190, 193, 200–201.Google Scholar
  17. 20.
    Wang Chenglan, “Qing chu jingshi Han guan de shenghuo kongjian he guanxi wangluo—yi Chen Mingxia he Liu Zhengzong wei ge an,” Jianghai xuekan 2007.6, 144–49; Tan Qian, “Chen Mingxia,” Bei you lu, ji wen xia (Hong Kong: Longmen shudian, 1969), 389.Google Scholar
  18. 29.
    Pan Zhifeng, “Wei Yijie de daotong lun,” Hebei daxue xuebao (zhexue shehui kexue ban) 28, no. 3 (September 2003): 102.Google Scholar
  19. 31.
    Bay Huang, 1587, A Tear of No Significance: The Ming Dynasty in Decline (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1981), 42–44;Google Scholar
  20. Liu Fangling, “Diwang daotonghua lixiang yu Qing chu shidafu dui jingyan rijiang de tuijin,” Yanshan daxue xuebao (zhexue shehui kexue ban) 10, no. 3 (September 2009): 88–89.Google Scholar
  21. 39.
    Madeleine Zelin, The Magistrate’s Tael: Rationalizing Fiscal Reform in Eighteenth-Century Ch’ing China (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984), 37–2.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Harry Miller 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harry Miller

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations