Skip to main content

Construction or Demolition: Does Problem Construction Influence the Ethicality of Creativity?

  • Chapter
The Ethics of Creativity

Abstract

Creativity researchers have long sought to understand the factors that foster or inhibit creative performance. Researchers have evaluated individual difference variables, such as personality (Feist, 1998; Furnham & Nederstrom, 2010), motivation (Amabile, 1996), and intelligence (Furnham & Nederstrom, 2010), as well as environmental factors, such as leadership (Reiter-Palmon & lilies, 2004) and organizational culture (Hunter, Bedell, & Mumford, 2007). More recently, researchers also have been interested in the implications or intent of the creative idea or solution. Do solutions lead to negative consequences that can be anticipated or even wanted by the problem-solver? Can we find a way to develop ethical and creative solutions?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 24.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 37.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in Context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S. J., & Conway, M. S. (1993). Investigating the structure ol autobiographical memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1178–1196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arreola, N. J., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2013). The influence of personality on problem construction and creative problem solving. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Artley, N. L., Van Horn, R., Friedrich, D. D., & Carroll, J. L. (1980). The relationship between problem finding, creativity, and cognitive style. Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 5, 20–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, J. M. (1988). Long-term effects of creativity training with middle school students. Journal of Early Adolescence, 8, 183–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basadur, M. S. (1997). Organizational development interventions for enhancing creativity in the workplace. Journal of Creative Behavior, 31, 59–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basadur, M. S., Graen, G. B., & Green, S. G. (1982). Training in creative problem solving: Effects on ideation and problem finding in an applied research organization. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 30, 41–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. R, & Newman, L. S. (1994). How stories make sense of personal experiences: Motives that shape autobiographical narratives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 676–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bing, M. N., Stewart, S. M., Davison, H. K., Green, P. D., Mclntyre, M. D., & James, L. R. (2007). An integrative typology of personality assessment for aggression: Implications for predicting counterproductive workplace behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 722–744.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bluck, S. (2003). Autobiographical memory: Exploring its functions in everyday life. Memory 11, 113–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bluck, S., & Habermas, T. (2000). The life story schema. Motivation and Emotion, 24, 121–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, K., & James, K. (1999). Justice and positive and negative creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 311–320. doi:10.1207/sl5326934crjl204_9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropley, D. H., Kaufman, J. C, & Cropley, A. J. (2008). Malevolent creativity: A functional model of creativity in terrorism and crime. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 105–115. doi:10.1080/10400410802059424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Dreu, C. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). Mental set and creative thought in social conflict: Threat rigidity versus motivated focus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 648–661. doi: 10.1037/0022–3514.95.3.648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellspermann, S. J., Evans, G. W., & Basadur, M. (2007). The impact of training on the formulation of ill-structured problems. Omega, 35, 221–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 290–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fontenot, N. A. (1993). Effects of training in creativity and creative problem finding upon business people. Journal of Social Psychology, 133, 11–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A., & Nederstrom, M. (2010). Ability, demographic and personality predictors of creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 957–961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getzels, J. W., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1976). The Creative Vision: A Longitudinal Study of Problem Finding in Art. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodstadt, B. E., & Hjelle, L. A. (1973). Power to the powerlessness: Locus of control and the use of power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 190–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, D. J., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2013). The influence of problem construction, implicit aggression, and task valence on malevolent creativity. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, D. J., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Kaufman, J. C. (2013). The effect of emotional intelligence and task type on malevolent creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7, 237–244. doi:10.1037/a0032139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holyoak, K. J. (1984). Mental models in problem solving. Inj. R. Anderson & S. M. Kosslyn (eds.), Tutorials in Learning and Memory (pp. 193–218). San Francisco, CA: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holyoak, K. J., & Thagard, P. (1997). The analogical mind. American Psychologist, 52, 35–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House, R. J., & Howell, J. M. (1992). Personality and charismatic leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 3, 81–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell, J. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1992). The ethics of charismatic leadership: Submission or liberation? The Executive, 6, 43–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, S. T, Bedell, K. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2007). Climate for creativity: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 69–90. lilies, J. J. & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2008). Responding destructively in leadership situations: The role of personal values and problem construction. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 251–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, K., Clark, K., & Cropanzano, R. (1999). Positive and negative creativity in groups, institutions, and organizations: A model and theoretical extension. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 211–226. doi:10.1207/sl5326934crjl203_6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, L. R. (1998). Measurement of personality via conditional reasoning. Organizational Research Methods, 1, 131–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, L. R., & LeBreton, J. M. (2011). Assessing the implicit personality through conditional reasoning. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, D. S. (1991). Computer interaction: Debugging the problems. In R. J. Sternberg & P. A. Frensch (eds.), Complex Problem Solving: Principles and Mechanisms (pp. 317–340). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, J. (2003). Parental images as a guide to leadership sense making: An attachment perspective on implicit leadership theories. Leadership Quarterly, 14, 141–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krasikova, D. V., Green, S. G., & LeBreton, J. M. (2013). Destructive leadership: A theoretical review, integration, and future research agenda. Journal of Management. Advanced online publication, doi: 10.1177/0149206312471388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S., & Dow, G. (2011). Malevolent creativity: Does personality influence malicious divergent thinking? Creativity Research Journal, 23, 73–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ligon, G., Harris, D. J., & Hunter, S. T. (2012). Quantifying leader lives: What historiometric approaches can tell us. Leadership Quarterly, 23, 1104–1133. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.10.004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ligon, G. S., Hunter, S. T., & Mumford, M. D. (2008). Development of outstanding leadership: A life narrative approach. Leadership Quarterly, 19, 312–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAdams, D. P. (1998). The role of defense in the life story. Journal of Personality, 66, 1125–1146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAdams, D. P. (2001). The psychology of life stories. Review of General Psychology, 5, 100–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D. C. (1975). Power: The Inner Experience. New York: Irvington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, M. D., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Redmond, M. R. (1994). Problem construction and cognition: Applying problem representations in ill-defined domains. In M. Runco (ed.), Problem Finding, Problem Solving, and Creativity (pp. 3–39). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, M. D., Connelly, M. S., Scott, G., Espejo, J., Sohl, L. M., Hunter, S. T, et al. (2005). Career experiences and scientific performance: A study of social, physical, life, and health sciences. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 105–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, M. D., Mobley, M. I., Uhlman, C. E., Reiter-Palmon, R., Doares, L. M. (1991). Process analytic models of creative thought. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 91–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, M. D., Supinski, E. P., Baughman, W. A., Costanza, D. P., & Threlfall, K. V. (1997). Process based measures of creative problem-solving skills; overall prediction. Creativity Research Journal, 10, 73–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, J. A., Mumford, M. D., Clifton, T. C, Gessner, T. E., & Connelly, M. S. (1995). Charismatic leadership and destructiveness: A historiometric study. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 529–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okuda, S. M., Runco, M. A., & Berger, D. E. (1991). Creativity and the finding and solving of real-world problems. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 9, 45–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pillemer, D. B. (2001). Momentous events and the life story. Review of General Psychology, 5, 123–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiter-Palmon, R., & lilies, J. J. (2004). Leadership and creativity: Understanding leadership from the creative problem-solving perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 15, 55–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiter-Palmon, R., Mumford, M. D., & Threlfall, K. V. (1998). Solving everyday problems creatively: The role of problem construction and personality type. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 187–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiter-Palmon, R., Mumford, M. D., Boes, O. J., & Runco, M. A. (1997). Problem construction and creativity: The role of ability, cue consistency, and active processing. Creativity Research Journal, 10, 9–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, S. A., & Pittinsky, T. L. (2006). Narcissistic leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 17, 617–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rostan, S. M. (1994). Problem finding, problem solving and cognitive controls: An empirical investigation ol critically acclaimed productivity. Creativity Research Journal, 7, 97–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, G., Leritz, L. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2004). The effectiveness ol creativity training: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 327–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sein, M. K., & Bostrom, R. P. (1989). Individual differences and conceptual models in training novice users. Human-Computer Interaction, 4, 197–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (1983). Intergenerational transfer ol individual differences in hereditary monarchs: Genetic, role-modeling, cohort, or socioculturel effects? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 354–364. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.44.2.354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (1994). Greatness: Who Makes History and Why. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, J. R, Wolfe, C. R., Lawrence, J. A., & Engle, R. A. (1991). From representation to decision: An analysis ol problem solving in international relations. In R. J. Sternberg & P. A. Frensch (eds.), Complex Problem Solving: Principles and Mechanisms (pp. 119–158). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T. B., Smith, S. M., & Finke, R. A. (1999). Creative cognition. In R. J. Sternberg (ed.), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 189–212). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigert, B. G., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2013). The influence ol goals and constraints on creativity. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Daniel J. Harris, Roni Reiter-Palmon, and Gina Scott Ligon

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Harris, D.J., Reiter-Palmon, R., Ligon, G.S. (2014). Construction or Demolition: Does Problem Construction Influence the Ethicality of Creativity?. In: Moran, S., Cropley, D., Kaufman, J.C. (eds) The Ethics of Creativity. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137333544_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics