Skip to main content

The Tempest as Theatrical Magic

  • Chapter
Revisiting The Tempest

Part of the book series: Palgrave Shakespeare Studies ((PASHST))

  • 180 Accesses

Abstract

We all suffer from delusions of control, even over storms and shipwrecks. We use that delusion whenever we edit or criticise Shakespeare, and as editor for the last 29 years of the New Variorum (NV) edition of our play, I share it more thoroughly than most. New Variorum editing is the ultimate postmodern activity, since it deals not with the play itself but with all subsequent editions and criticisms about it. Over the years as a NV editor I have read and collated over seventy editions and thousands of critiques about The Tempest. But whether we edit or criticise, on page or on stage, the play becomes a less rich phenomenon than it should be, even when viewed, bare as it is, on the pages of the First Folio. What I am offering here is an example of my own paranoid delusion of control, by means of a rapid overview, with just a few items from the available horde of possible examples, offering just one aspect of the multiple criticisms of the play through the last two and a bit centuries, the play as theatrical magic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Works cited

  • Bate, Jonathan (1989) Shakespearean Constitutions: Politics, Theatre, Criticism 1730–1830, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brower, Reuben A. (1951) Fields of Light, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullough, Geoffrey (1975) Narrative and Dramatic Sources of Shakespeare, VIII, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Thomas (1838) The Dramatic Works of William Shakespeare, I, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowden, Edward (1962) A Critical Study of his Mind and Art (3rd edn 1877), London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowden, Edward (1968) “The Serenity of The Tempest”, in David J. Palmer (ed.), Shakespeare, The Tempest: A Casebook, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenblatt, Stephen (2004) Will in the World: How Shakespeare Became Shakespeare, London: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greer, Germaine (1986) Shakespeare: Past Masters, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, Donna B. (1990) Virgil and The Tempest, Columbus: Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, Harriett (1960) “Fabulous Counterfeits: Dramatic Construction and Dramatic Perspectives in The Spanish Tragedy, A Midsummer Night’s Dream, and The Tempest”, Shakespeare Studies 6: 51–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, Geoffrey (2008) “The Lords of Limit”, in Kenneth Hayes (ed.), Collected Critical Writings, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 58–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, Constance (1997) Shakespeare’s Monarchies. Ruler and Subject in the Romances, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernan, Alvin B. (1979) The Playwright as Magician: Shakespeare’s Image of the Poet in the English Public Theater, New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kipling, Rudyard (1916) “How Shakespeare Came to Write The ‘Tempest”, Introduction by Ashley Thorndike, Printed for the Dramatic Museum of Columbia University (originally published as a letter in The Spectator 2 July 1898).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lytton Strachey, Giles (1924) “Shakespeare’s Final Period”, in Books and Characters, London: Chatto & Windus.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, Russ (2006) Shakespeare’s Late Style, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McMullan, Gordon (2007) Shakespeare and the Idea of Late Writing: Authorship in the Proximity of Death, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mowat, Barbara (1976) The Dramaturgy of Shakespeare’s Romances, Athens: University of Georgia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowat, Barbara (1981) “Prospero, Agrippa, and Hocus-Pocus”, English Literary Renaissance 11(3): 281–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muir, Kenneth (1961) Last Periods of Shakespeare, Racine, and Ibsen, Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Robert (1958) Play within a Play: The Dramatist’s Conception of His Art. Shakespeare to Anouilh, New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevo, Ruth (1987) Shakespeare’s Other Language, London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orgel, Stephen (1998) “Marginal Jonson”, in David Bevington and Peter Holbrook (eds), The Politics of the Stuart Court Masque, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 144–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoll, Edgar Elmer (1932) “The Tempest”, PMLA 47, 699–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodbridge, Linda (1994) The Scythe of Saturn, Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Andrew Gurr

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gurr, A. (2014). The Tempest as Theatrical Magic. In: Bigliazzi, S., Calvi, L. (eds) Revisiting The Tempest. Palgrave Shakespeare Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137333148_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics