Abstract
From the examples discussed here in the visual arts, music, film, and fiction, it should be clear that the move beyond form conveys real philosophical meaning, meaning that is difficult to express by language alone. This meaning, embodied in a creative undoing of form, conveys important truths about contemporary culture, truths that elude our habitual modes of thought. We tend to think in terms of discrete objects that we analyze individually, at least in the West.1 We divide the world into entities, concepts, or types, and examine their individual properties. This approach reinforces categories, as well as boundaries and divisions. The very structure of grammar encourages this way of thinking: subjects and objects are separate units and subjects operate on objects. Logic furthers this divide-and-conquer approach. By the principle of non-contradiction, what is A cannot be not-A. Opposites are situated on opposing poles. This way of thinking in discrete entities and polarities is supremely useful. It has resulted in inestimable progress in knowledge, and there is no intention here to undercut that valuable legacy. It does, however, obstruct an alternative way of thinking, one that can be particularly illuminating in contemporary culture.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
J. Henrich, S. J. Heine, and A. Norenzayan, “Most People Are not WEIRD,” Nature vol. 466 (July 1, 2010), doi: 10.1038/466029a
Jane Jacobs, The Nature of Economies (New York: Modern Library, 2000), 32.
I am indebted to Pat Byrne for his paper on Ecology, Economy and Redemption as Dynamic: The Contributions of Jane Jacobs and Bernard Lonergan, delivered at a conference on environmental ethics at Notre Dame (February, 2002).
Quoted from The Death and Life of GreatAmerican Cities by Douglas Martin in “Jane Jacobs, Social Critic Who Redefined and Championed Cities, Is Dead at 89,” The New York Times (April 26, 2006).
Holland Cotter, “Beyond Multiculturalism, Freedom?” New York Times (July 29, 2001).
Emmanuel Levinas, Alterity and Transcendence, trans. Michael B. Smith (New York: Columbia University Press, 1999), 87.
Jacques Derrida, On Cosmopolitanism and Forgiveness, trans. Mark Dooley and Michael Hughes (New York and London: Routledge, [1997]2001), 39, 45.
Roland Barthes, “From Work to Text,” in Image-Music-Text (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1977), 155–64.
Erin Hogan, Spiral Jetta (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2008), 168–69.
See Don Tapscott and Anthony D. William, Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything (New York: Portfolio, 2006).
For more on this, see Matt Bai, “The Presidency, Chained to the World,” New York Times (September 12, 2010).
Ihab Hassan, The Dismemberment of Orpheus: Toward a Postmodern Literature (New York: Oxford University Press, 1971), 269.
Copyright information
© 2013 Mary Joe Hughes
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hughes, M.J. (2013). Conclusion. In: The Move Beyond Form. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137329226_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137329226_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-45656-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-32922-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)