Advertisement

The Strange Neglect of the Basis of Equality in Contemporary Egalitarianism

  • John Charvet

Abstract

A view widely held in contemporary Western ethical thinking is that all serious thought about political ethics in the modern world must begin with a belief in human equality that is substantive rather than formal. This is the belief that justifies Ronald Dworkin’s claim, in a phrase frequently endorsed, that modern political philosophy inhabits an egalitarian plateau.1 This book will begin with a discussion of what this substantive sense of equality is. However, the book’s main aim is to explore the very serious problems that arise from the way in which this sense of equality has been standardly justified and to propose a revision of that justification which will resolve these problems. Subsequently, the implications of this revised version for acceptable principles of justice, at national and international levels, will be discussed.

Keywords

Difference Principle Procedural Fairness Political Ideal Distributive Ideal Luck Egalitarianism 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. This claim is made by Ian Carter (2011), ‘Respect and the Basis of Equality’, Ethics, 121/3, 538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 1.
    R. Dworkin, (1973) ‘The Original Position’, University of Chicago Law Review, 40/3, 532.Google Scholar
  3. 2.
    J. S. Mill attributes this claim to Bentham. J. S. Mill, (1910), ‘Utilitarianism’ in Utilitarianism, Liberty and Representative Government (London: J. M. Dent), 58.Google Scholar
  4. 3.
    R. M. Hare, (1981) Moral Thinking (Oxford: Clarendon Press), 20–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 4.
    A. Sen, (1992), Inequality Reexamined (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 17.Google Scholar
  6. 5.
    Plato, (1941), Republic, tr. F. M. Cornford (Oxford: Clarendon Press), 311.Google Scholar
  7. 6.
    Aristotle, (1921), Politics, tr. B. Jowett (Oxford: Clarendon Press), 1252Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hastings Rashdall, The Theory of Good and Evil: A Treatise on Moral Philosophy 1 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1924), 238–9.Google Scholar
  9. 12.
    T. Hurka, (1993), Perfectionism (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 167–8.Google Scholar
  10. 13.
    J. J. Rousseau, (1968) The Social Contract (London: Penguin Books), 68.Google Scholar
  11. 14.
    The phrase echoes John Locke but the major contemporary libertarian is R. Nozick, (1974), Anarchy, State and Utopia (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
  12. 15.
    See the useful collection of most of these and many others in L. P. Pojman and R. Westmoreland (eds) (1997), Equality: Selected Readings (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  13. 16.
    This phrase is to be found in Rawls, (1980), ‘Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory’, Journal of Philosophy, 77/9, 543Google Scholar
  14. Rawls, (1985), ‘Justice as Fairness: Political not Metaphysical’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 14/3, 242.Google Scholar
  15. 17.
    J. Rawls, (1999a), A Theory of Justice (rev. edn., Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  16. 18.
    R. Dworkin, (1981) ‘What is Equality? Part 1, Equality of Welfare and Part 2, Equality of Resources’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 10/3, 4Google Scholar
  17. 22.
    R. Arneson, (1989), ‘Equality and Equal Opportunity for Welfare’, Philosophical Studies, 56/1, 77–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. G. A. Cohen, (1989), ‘On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice’, Ethics, 99/4, 906–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 24.
    J. Wolff, (1998),‘Fairness, Respect and the Egalitarian Ethos’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 27/2, 97–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 25.
    E. Anderson, (1999), ‘What is the Point of Equality?’ Ethics, 109/2, 287–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 27.
    D. Miller, (1998), ‘Justice and Equality’, in A. Mason (ed.), Ideals of Equality (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers), 21–36.Google Scholar
  22. 29.
    S. Scheffler, (2003), ‘What is Egalitarianism?’ Philosophy and Public Affairs, 31/1, 5–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 30.
    R. Dworkin,(2003), Sovereign Virtue (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), 1.Google Scholar
  24. 32.
    L. S. Temkin, Inequality (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993), 247–8.Google Scholar
  25. 35.
    T. Scanlon, ‘The Diversity of Objections to Inequality’, Essays in Political Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), 202–18.Google Scholar
  26. 36.
    R. Dworkin, Justice for Hedgehogs (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
  27. 37.
    G. Cupit ‘The Basis of Equality’, Philosophy, 75/1 (2000), 105–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© John Charvet 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Charvet
    • 1
  1. 1.London School of EconomicsUK

Personalised recommendations