Skip to main content

Negotiation and Adaptation: Singapore Theater as Civil Society

  • Chapter
Cultural Policies in East Asia
  • 912 Accesses

Abstract

The relationship between the arts sector and the Singaporean government can best be characterized as an uneasy one. For a newly independent nation, the promotion of arts was seen as a luxury; issues such as sustained economic growth and social stability were deemed more important. It was only in 1990, more than two decades after independence, that the Singapore government published its first recognizable official cultural policy document. This is not to say that there were little or no arts events happening in Singapore before the 1990s. Rather, the arts sector flourished from the 1980s up to the early 1990s because the ‘pragmatic, philistine modernity promoted by the government’ was indifferent to arts, as the arts sector then ‘was not considered important enough to warrant attention’ (Wee 2003, p. 86). This resulted in an arts sector that operated under relatively few restrictions. During this time, arts production in Singapore, particularly in theatre, offered a space to address issues that were ‘in distinction from established ways of thinking and operating in Singapore’ (Krishnan 1997, p. 17).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Censorship Review Committee (2010) Censorship Review Committee 2010 Report (Singapore: CRC 2010 Secretariat).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chia, A. (2010a) ‘High-level Panel to Jazz Up Arts and Culture Scene’, Straits Times, September 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chia, A. (2010b) ‘Funds Cut: Is it Censorship? Artists Say NAC’s “Core Values” Criteria for Funding are Subjective’, Straits Times, May 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chia, A. (2010c) ‘Cut and thrust of arts funding: Arts council should not use funding cuts to weed out critical Works’, Straits Times, December 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, T-C. and Lee, W-K. (2003) ‘Renaissance City Singapore: A Study of Arts Spaces’, Area, 35(2), 128–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chong, T. (2010) ‘The State and the New Society: The Role of the Arts in Singapore Nation-building’, Asian Studies Review, 34, 131–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chua, B-H. (1995) Communitarian Ideology and Democracy in Singapore (London and New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chua, B-H. (2005) ‘Liberalization Without Democratization: Singapore in the Next Decade’, in F. Loh and J. Öjendal (eds), Southeast Asian Responses to Globalization Restructuring Governance and Deepening Democracy (Denmark and Singapore: Nordic Institute of Asian Studies Press and Institute of Southeast Asian Studies).

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, M. (2009) Civil Society (2nd edition) (Cambridge, UK and Malden, US: Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, F-K., Fernandez, W. and Tan, S. (1997) Lee Kuan Yew: The Man and His Ideas (Singapore: Times Edition).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M. and Lian, K-F. (1995) The Politics of Nation Building and Citizenship in Singapore (London and New York: Routledge).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, K-L. (2000) ‘Citizen Participation and Policy Making in Singapore Conditions and Predicaments’, Asian Survey, 40(3), 436–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, M. and Germain R.D. (2005) ‘The Idea(l) of Global Civil Society Introduction’, in M. Kenny and R.D. Germain (eds), The Idea of Global Civil Society: Politics and Ethics in a Globalizing Era (London and New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan, S. (1997) ‘Introduction’, in S. Krishnan (ed.), 9 Lives 10 Years of Singapore Theatre 1987–1997 (Singapore: The Necessary Stage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T. (2005) ‘Gestural Politics: Civil Society in “New” Singapore’, Sojourn: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia, 20(2), 132–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E. (2008) Singapore the Unexpected Nation (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T. (2010) The Media, Cultural Control and Government in Singapore (London and New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahtani, S. (2012) Pink Dot in Singapore Highlights Gay Rights Debate, http://blogs.wsj.com/searealtime/2012/07/02/pink-dot-in-singapore-highlights-changing-gay-rights-debate, date accessed May 30, 2013.

  • Media Development Authority (2013) Fact Sheet — Online News Sites to Be Placed On a More Consistent Licensing Framework as Traditional News Platforms, http://mda.gov.sg/NewsAndEvents/PressRelease/2013/Pages/28052013.aspx, date accessed May 30, 2013.

  • Ministry of Culture, Community and Youth (2012) The Report of the Arts and Culture Strategic Review (Singapore: Ministry of Culture, Community and Youth).

    Google Scholar 

  • National Arts Council (2013) ‘Seed Funding Grant Application Guidelines’, http://nac.gov.sg/docs/grants/fy13-seed-grant-application-guidelines.pdf, date accessed May 30, 2013.

  • Tan, C. (2010) ‘No Go for Arts Event; the Media Development Authority Wants Forum Theatre Piece to be Moved Indoors Due to Sensitive Nature of Topics’, Straits Times, August 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, C. (2011) ‘Council to Give Arts Funding 25% Boost; 16 Groups to Get almost $2 Million in Total’, Straits Times, March 31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffauer, W. (2004) ‘Cosmopolitans are Cosmopolitans: On the Relevance of Local Identification in Globalizing Society’, in J. Friedman and S. Randeria (eds), Worlds on the Move: Globalization, Migration and Cultural Security (London and New York: I.B. Tauris).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasil, R. (2000) Governing Singapore: A History of National Development and Democracy (Australia: Allen and Unwin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wee, C.J. W-L. (2003) ‘Creating High Culture in the Globalized “Culture Desert” of Singapore’, The Drama Review, 47(4), 84–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Lorraine Lim

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lim, L. (2014). Negotiation and Adaptation: Singapore Theater as Civil Society. In: Lee, HK., Lim, L. (eds) Cultural Policies in East Asia. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137327772_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics