Skip to main content

Pressures towards and within Universalism: Conceptualising Change in Care Policy and Discourse

  • Chapter

Abstract

Within Europe, care policies for children and older people have been, over the last two decades, one of the most dynamic policy areas of welfare state development. Both long-term care (LTC) and early childhood education and care (ECEC) respond to changing needs and demands for care. Ageing populations, labour market participation of women, decline in fertility and changes in family dynamics put pressure on national care systems. Although all countries that are analysed in depth in Part II (Austria, Denmark, England, Germany, Italy, Poland and Spain) experience these changes in needs and demands, albeit with different degrees, their responses vary depending on a number of factors ranging from their institutional history of welfare evolution, industrial relations and migratory regime to political discourses and social norms and values. This chapter will look at discourses and policy agenda setting, framing developments in care for the two extremes of the life cycle, children and older people, at both supranational and national levels and since the 1990s until today.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anttonen, A., Häikiö, L. and Stefánsson, K. (eds) (2013a) Welfare State, Unversalism and Diversity, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anttonen, A., Häikiö, L., Stéfansson, K. and Sipilä, J. (2013b) ‘Universalism and the challenge of diversity’ in Anttonen, A., Häikiö, L. and Stefánsson, K. (eds) (2013a) Welfare State, Unversalism and Diversity, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettio, F., Simonazzi, A. and Villa, P. (2006) ‘Change in care regimes and female migration: the ‘care drain’ in the Mediterranean’, Journal of European Social Policy, 16(3): 271–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budig, M., Misra, J. and Boeckmann, I. (2012) ‘The motherhood penalty in cross-national perspective: the importance of work-family policies and cultural attitudes’, Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 19(2): 163–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewster, K. L. and Rindfuss, R. R. (2000) ‘Fertility and women’s employment in industrialized nations’, Annual Review of Sociology, 26: 271–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CoRe (2011) ‘Competence Requirements in Early Childhood Education and Care’, London and Ghent, September 2011, http://ec.europa.eu/education/more-information/doc/2011/core_en.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa G. (2013) ‘Long-term care Italian policies: a case of inertial institutional change’ in Ranci C. and Pavolini E. (eds) Reforms in Long-Term Care Policies in Europe. Investigating Institutional Change and Social Impacts, New York: Springer, 221–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Da Roit, B., Le Bihan, B. and Oesterle, A. (2007) ‘Long-term care reforms in Italy, Austria and France. variations in cash-for-care schemes’, Social Policy & Administration, 41(6): 653–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, M. (1997) ‘Welfare states under pressure: cash benefits in European Welfare States over the last ten years’, Journal of European Social Policy, 7(2): 129–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, M. (2011) ‘What adult worker model? a critical look at recent social policy reform in Eurpe from a gender and family perspective’, Social Politics, 18(1): 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, M. and Lewis, J. (2000) ‘The concept of social care and the analysis of contemporary welfare states’, British Journal of Sociology, 51(2): 281–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, M. and Scheiwe, K. (2010) ‘Individualisation and personal obligations — social policy, family policy and law reform in Germany and the UK’, Law, Policy and the Family, 24(2): 177–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eydal, G.B. and Rostgaard, T. (2011a) ‘Gender equality re-visited: Changes in Nordic child-care policies in the 2000?’ Regional issue, Social Policy & Administration, vol. 45, Issue 2, 16–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eydal, G.B. and Rostgaard, T. (forthcoming) ‘Introduction’, in Eydal, G.B. and Rostgaard, T. (eds) Fatherhood in the Nordic Welfare States — Comparing Care Policies and Practice. Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1999) The Social Foundations of Post-industrial Economies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (2009) The Incomplete Revolution: Adapting to Women’s New Roles, Cambridge & Malden: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2013a) Long-term Care in Ageing Societies — Challenges and Policy Options, Commission Staff Working Document, SWD (2013) 41 final.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2013b) Towards social investment for growth and cohesion, Commission Communication COM (2013) 83final, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, A. (2007) ‘The impact of family policies on fertility’, Population Research and Policy Review, 26: 323–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerda, N. and Andersson, G. (2008) ‘Consequences of family policies on child-bearing behaviour: effects or artefacts?’ Population and Development Review, vol. 34(4): 699–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glendinning, C. K. Jones, K. Baxter, P. Rabiee, L. Curtis, A. Wilde, H. Arksey, J. Forder (2011) ‘Home care re-ablement services: investigating the longer-term impacts’, Final report, Social Policy Research Unit, University of York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. (1993) ‘Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policy-making in Britain’, in Comparative Politics, 25(3): 275–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, E. and Österle, A. (2003) ‘Welfare state policy and informal long-term care giving in Austria: old gender divisions and new stratification processes among women’, Journal of Social Policy, 32: 37–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. (2008) ‘Schools, Skills, and Synapses’, Working Paper 14064 National Bureau of Economic Research. Cambridge, MA. Available from: http://www.nber.org/papers/w14064.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjemmehjælpskommissionen (2013) Fremtidens Hjemmehjælp — Ældres Ressourcer I Centrum for en Sammenhængende Indsats, Social og Integrationsministeriet: København.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, B. and Ólah, L. (2006) ‘Birthstrikes? agency and capabilities in the reconciliation of employment and family’, Marriage and Family Review, 39(3–3): 197–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, M. and Ramesh, M. (1995) Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibáñez, Z. and León, M. (2014) ‘Resisting crisis at what cost? migrant care workers in private households’ in Anderson, B. and Shutes, I. Migrations and Care Labour. Theory, Policy and Politics, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 110–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamerman, S. and Moss, P. (2009) The Politics of Parental Leave Policies: Children, Parenting, Gender and the Labour Market, Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knijn, T. and Kremer, M. (1997) ‘Gender and the caring dimension of welfare states: toward inclusive citizenship’, in Social Politics. International Studies in Gender, State and Society, vol. 4. no. 3. Special Issue, 328–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kröger, T and Leinonen, A. (2011) ‘Transformation by Stealth. The Retargeting of Home Care Services in Finland’, in Health and Social Care in the Community, 2012, vol. 20, no. 3 319–327 (article first published online 9th December 2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kröger, T. (2011) ‘Under Tension: Formal Care Work with Older People’, in B. Pfau-Effinger & T. Rostgaard (eds), Care between Work and Welfare in European Societies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 115–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leitner, S. (2003) ‘Varieties of Familialism. The Caring Function of the Family in Comparative Perspective’ European Societies 5(4): 353–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leitner, S. and Lessenich, S. (2007) ‘(In)Dependence as dependent variable: conceptualizing and measuring “de-familialization”’, in J. Clasen and N. Siegel (eds), Investigating Welfare State Change. The ‘Dependent Variable Problem’ in Comparative Analysis, Cheltenham/Northhampton: Edward Elgar, 244–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, H. and Palenga-Mollenbeck, E. (2010) ‘Care work migration in Germany: semi-compliance and complicity’, Social Policy & Society, 9(3): 419–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLanahan, S. (2004) ‘Diverging destinies: how children are faring under the second demographic transition’, Demography, 41(4): 607–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meagher, G. and Szebehely, M. (2013) ‘Marketisation in Nordic Eldercare: A Research Report on Legislation, Oversight, Extent and Consequences’, Department of Social Work, Stockholm University, downloadable here http://www.normacare.net/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morabito, C., Vandenbroeck, M. and Roose, R. (2012) ‘“The greatest of equalisers”: a critical review of international organisations’ views on early childhood care and education’, Journal of Social Policy, published online on 26 April 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morel, N., Palier, B. and Palme, J. (eds) (2012) Towards a Social Investment Welfare State? Ideas, Policies and Challenges, Bristol & Chicago: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, K. J. (2012) ‘Promoting social investment through work-family policies: which nations do it and why?’, in Morel, N., Palier, B. and Palme, J. (eds), Towards a Social Investment Welfare State? Ideas, Policies and Challenges, Bristol & Chicago: The Policy Press, 153–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naumann, I. (2012) ‘Childcare politics in the “new” welfare state’, in Bonoli, G. and Natali, D. (eds), The Politics of the New Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 158–181.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2003) ‘Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: sen and social justice’, Feminist Economics, 9(2–3): 33–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2001) ‘Starting Strong: Early Childhood Education and Care’, OECD, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2005) ‘Long-Term Care for Older People’, OECD, Paris.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2011) ‘Help Wanted? Providing and Paying for Long-term Care’, OECD, Paris.Österle, August (2013), ‘Long-term care reform in Austria: emergence and development of a new welfare state pillar’, in Ranci, C. and Pavolini, E. (eds), Reforms in Long-term Care Policies in Europe: Investigating Institutional Change and Social Impacts, New York: Springer, 159–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfau-Effinger, B. (2005) ‘Welfare state policies and the development of care arrangements’, European Societies, 7(2): 321–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfau-Effinger, B. and Rostgaard, T. (eds) (2011) Care Between Work and Welfare in European Societies, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfau-Effinger, B., Flaquer, L. and Jensen, Per H. (2009) Formal and Informal Work in Europe: The Hidden Work Regime. London, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfau-Effinger, B., Jensen, P.H. and Och, R. (2011) ‘Tensions between‚ “consumerism” in elderly care and social rights of family carers: a German-Danish comparison’, Nordic Journal of Social Research, 2, Special Issue, 7–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranci, C. and Pavolini, E. (eds) (2013) Reforms in Long-Term Care Policies in Europe. Investigating Institutional Change and Social Impacts, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez Cabrero, G. and Marbán Gallego, V. (2013) ‘Long-term care in Spain: between family care tradition and the public recognition of social risks’ in Ranci, C. and Pavolini, E. (eds) Reforms in Long-Term Care Policies in Europe. Investigating Institutional Change and Social Impacts, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rostgaard, T. (2006) ‘The construction of consumerism — free choice of care for the elderly in Denmark’, European Societies, 8(3): 443–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rostgaard, T. (2012), ‘Quality reforms in Danish home care: balancing between standardisation and individualisation’, Health and Social Care in the Community, 20(3), 247–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rostgaard, T. and Szebehely, M. (2012) ‘Changing policies, changing patterns of care: Danish and Swedish home care at the crossroads’, European Journal of Ageing, 9(2), 101–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rostgaard, T., Timonen, V. and Glendinning, C. (2012) ‘Reforming home care in ageing societies’, Health and Social Care in the Community, 20(3): 225–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saraceno, C. (1994) ‘The ambivalent familism of the Italian welfare state’, Social Politics, 1(1): 60–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, V. (2008) ‘Discursive institutionalism: the explanatory power of ideas and discourse’, Annual Review of Political Science, 11: 303–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schober, P. S. (2012) ‘Gender equality and outsourcing of domestic work, child-bearing and relationship stability among British couples’, Journal of Family Issues, published online 24 January 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stefánsson, K. (2013) ‘What is in a word? universalism, ideology and practice’, in Anttonen, A., Häikiö, L. and Stefánsson, K. (eds), Welfare State, Unversalism and Diversity, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 42–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theobald H. and Hampel S. (2012) ‘Radical institutional change and incremental transformation: long-term care insurance in Germany’ in Ranci C. and Pavolini E. (eds) Reforms in Long-Term Care Policies in Europe: Investigating Institutional Change and Social Impacts, New York: Springer, 117–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timonen, V., Convery, J. and Cahill, S. (2006) ‘Care revolution in the making: a comparison of cash-for-care programmes in four European countries’, Ageing and Society, 26: 455–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triantafillou J., Mestheneos E., Prouskas C., Goltsi V., Kontouka S. and Loukissis A. (2006) ‘The National Survey Report for Greece. EUROFAMCARE — Services for Supporting Family Carers of Dependent Older People in Europe: Characteristics’, Coverage and Usage, http://www.uke.uni-hamburg.de/extern/eurofamcare/documents/deliverables/nasure_el.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulle, E. (ed.) (2004) Old Age and Agency, Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ungerson, C. and Yeandle, S. (eds) (2007) Cash-for-care in Developed Welfare States, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vabø, M. (2012) ‘Norwegian home care in transition — heading for accountability, off-loading responsibilities’, Health and Social Care in the Community, May, 20(3): 283–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vabø, M. (2006), ‘Caring for people or caring for proxy consumers?’, European Societies, 8(3): 403–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (2002) Active Ageing: A Policy Framework, Geneva: WHO.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Margarita León, Costanzo Ranci and Tine Rostgaard

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

León, M., Ranci, C., Rostgaard, T. (2014). Pressures towards and within Universalism: Conceptualising Change in Care Policy and Discourse. In: León, M. (eds) The Transformation of Care in European Societies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137326515_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics