Advertisement

Neo-liberal Governance and the Protest Politics of the Occupy Movement

  • Daniel Bray
Chapter

Abstract

The 2008 Global Financial Crisis precipitated a new wave of antineo-liberal activism directed at exposing the injustices of finance capitalism and its perversion of representative democracy. Inspired by the Arab Spring revolutions and the protest encampments of the Spanish Indignados, this activism spilled onto the streets of New York in September 2011 with a call to occupy Wall St in protest against ‘the damaging influence of corporations on politics’ (Adbusters, 2011). A month later, the ‘Occupy movement’ had spread to over 90 cities around the world, capturing public attention with slogans condemning rising inequality, austerity, corporate bailouts and the general disempowerment of ‘the 99%’. It also captured the public imagination in many countries with experiments in direct democracy that created alternative political communities within prominent hubs of corporate power. Tolerated at first, by early 2012 the major occupations had been evicted by municipal authorities. Today, the movement’s post-eviction repertoire of resistance has shifted from mass occupations to decentralised campaigns and street protests on a variety of issues ranging from housing foreclosures in the US to minority rights and social welfare in Slovenia (Razsa and Kurnik, 2012). This post-eviction activism relies on social media networks to maintain the mobilisation, solidarities and public attention created during the mass occupations.

Keywords

World Trade Organisation Global Financial Crisis Direct Democracy Representative Democracy Social Media Network 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackerman, J. M. (2005) Social Accountability in the Public Sector: A Conceptual Discussion World Bank Washington DC, accessed 20 January 2013, <http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTPCENG/214574-1116506074750/20542263/FINALAckerman.pdf>.
  2. Adbusters (2011) #OccupyWallStreet weblog post 13 July, date accessed 8 January 2013, <http://www.adbusters.org/blogs/adbusters-blog/occupywallstreet.html>.
  3. Armstrong, A., Glynn, A. and Harrison, J. (1991) Capitalism since World War II: The Making and Breaking of the Long Boom (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).Google Scholar
  4. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) (2012) Decline in Trade Union Membership cat. no. 6310.0, accessed 17 January 2013, <http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/6310.0main+features3August%202011>.
  5. Bleiker, R. (2002) ‘Activism after Seattle: Dilemmas of the Anti-globalisation Movement’, Pacifica Review, 14(3): 191–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bray, D. (2011) Pragmatic Cosmopolitanism: Representation and Leadership in Transnational Democracy (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar
  7. Brown, W. (2005) ‘Neoliberalism and the End of Liberal Democracy’ in Edgework: Critical Essays on Knowledge and Politics (Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
  8. Brownlie, N. (2012) Trade Union Membership 2011 UK Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, London, accessed 17 January 2013, <https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/32192/12-p77-trade-union-membership-2011.pdf>.
  9. Byrne, J. (ed.) (2012) The Occupy Handbook (New York: Little, Brown).Google Scholar
  10. Cerny, P. (2000) ‘Restructuring the Political Arena: Globalisation and the Paradoxes of the Competition State’, in R. D. Germain (ed.) Globalization and its Critics: Perspectives from Political Economy (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
  11. Cerny, P. (2009) ‘The Competition State Today’, Policy Studies, 31(1): 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chenoweth, E. (2012) ‘Creative Nonviolence Can Defeat Repression’ in New York Times, date accessed 27 August 2012, <http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2012/08/20/what-makes-protest-effective/creative-nonviolence-can-defeat-repression>.
  13. Crouch, C. (2011) The Strange Non-Death of Neoliberalism (Cambridge: Polity).Google Scholar
  14. Dicken, P. (2011) Global Shift: Mapping the Changing Contours of the World Economy, 6th edition (New York: Guilford).Google Scholar
  15. European Commission (2012) Unemployment Statistics, date accessed 31 January 2013, <http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/Unemployment_statistics#Further_Eurostat_information>.
  16. Gitlin, T. (2012) ‘More Than a Protest Movement’ in The Nation, date accessed 8 January 2013, <http://www.thenation.com/article/166822/more-protest-movement>.
  17. Harvey, D. (2005) A Brief History of Neoliberalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  18. Juris, J. S. (2012) ‘Reflections on #Occupy Everywhere: Social media, public space, and emerging logics of aggregation’, American Ethnologist, 39(2): 259–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. #Occupy London (2013) The Consensus Process, date accessed 8 January 2013, <http://occupylsx.org/?page_id=1999>.
  20. #OccupyTogether (2013) Learn about#occupy: Background and timeline, date accessed 20 January 2013, <http://www.occupytogether.org/aboutoccupy/>.
  21. Muldoon, J. (ed.) (2012) Occupy Reflects Melbourne, date accessed 19 December 2012, <http://zinelibrary.info/files/Occupy%20Reflects.pdf>.
  22. Nugent, D. (2012) ‘Commentary: Democracy, temporalities of capitalism, and dilemmas of inclusion in Occupy movements’, American Ethnologist, 39(2): 280–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2011a) An Overview of Growing Income Inequality in OECD Countries: Main Findings Paris, date accessed 5 January 2013, <http://www.oecd.org/els/socialpoliciesanddata/49499779.pdf>.
  24. OECD (2011b) Divided We Stand: Why Inequality Keeps Rising — Country Note: United States, Paris, date accessed 5 January 2013, <http://www.oecd.org/els/socialpoliciesanddata/49170253.pdf>.
  25. OECD (2011c) Divided We Stand: Why Inequality Keeps Rising — Country Note: United Kingdom, Paris, date accessed 5 January 2013, <http://www.oecd.org/els/socialpoliciesanddata/49170234.pdf>.
  26. OECD (2011d) Divided We Stand: Why Inequality Keeps Rising — Country Note: Australia, Paris, date accessed 5 January 2013, <http://www.oecd.org/els/socialpoliciesanddata/49177643.pdf>.
  27. OECD (2011e) Divided We Stand: Why Inequality Keeps Rising — Country Note: France, Paris, date accessed 5 January 2013, <http://www.oecd.org/els/socialpoliciesanddata/49177803.pdf>.
  28. Piketty, T. and Saez, E. (2007) ‘Income and Wage Inequality in the United States, 1913–2002’ in A. B. Atkinson and T. Piketty (eds) Top Incomes over the Twentieth Century: A Contrast between Continental European and English-Speaking Countries (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  29. Pitkin, H. F. (1967) The Concept of Representation (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar
  30. Pleyers, G. (2010) ‘The Global Justice Movement’, Globality Studies Journal, 19(1): 1–14.Google Scholar
  31. Quiggin, J. (2010) Zombie Economic: How Dead Ideas Still Walk Among Us (Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
  32. Razsa, M. and Kurnik, A. (2012) ‘The Occupy Movement in Zizek’s Hometown: Direct democracy and politics of becoming’, American Ethnologist, 39(2): 238–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Roberts, A. (2012) ‘Why the Occupy Movement Failed’, Public Administration Review, 72(5): 754–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ruggie, J. G. (1982) ‘International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order’, International Organization, 36(2): 379–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Scholte, J. A. (2000) ‘Cautionary Reflections on Seattle’, Millennium, 29(1): 115–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Seoane, J. and Taddai, E. (2002) ‘From Seattle to Porto Allegre: The Anti-Neoliberal Globalization Movement’, Current Sociology, 50(1): 99–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stiglitz, J. (2002) Globalisation and its Discontents (London: Penguin Books).Google Scholar
  38. Stiglitz, J. (2012) The Price of Inequality: How Today’s Divided Society Endangers Our Future (London: Norton).Google Scholar
  39. Turner, R. (2008) Neoliberal Ideology: History, Concepts and Policies (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press).Google Scholar
  40. Urbinati, N. (2006) Representative Democracy: Principles and Genealogy (Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. US Bureau of Labor Statistics (2012) Union Members Summary, US Department of Labor, date accessed 17 January 2013, <http://www.bls.gov/news.release/union2.nr0.htm>.

Copyright information

© Daniel Bray 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Bray

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations